Developments Concerning Women In Combat

BY Herschel Smith
11 years, 5 months ago

Women in combat, and in fact, in special operations.

The commander of U.S. special operations said Tuesday he expects to see women in the elite commando forces now that the Pentagon is allowing them to serve in combat.

Adm. William McRaven, head of the US special operations command, said he was “fully supportive” of the decision to lift the ban on women in combat.

I’ll tell you what.  Obama has himself some lackeys doesn’t he?  Adm. McRaven is remarkable.  But no more so than the current Commandant of the Marine Corps.

In his first interview since the Pentagon opened ground combat jobs to women, the commandant of the Marine Corps said some occupations may ultimately remain closed if only a small number qualify.

The Marines will not lower physical standards for certain specialties, Gen. James Amos told USA TODAY. “We can’t afford to lower standards,” he said. “We can’t make adjustments on what’s required on the battlefield.

“That’s not why America has a Marine Corps,” he said.

Sounds like he isn’t so much of a lackey, huh?  But wait.

The Pentagon last week ordered that the services provide the opportunity for women to enter all fields, including infantry, tanks, artillery and other combat arms.

The entire process could take years as the services develop and validate “gender neutral” standards. The secretary of Defense would have to approve any fields that remain closed to women.

“If the numbers are so small with regards to qualification, then there very may well be (job fields) that remain closed,” Amos said. “Those will be few and far between.”

Deploying only one or two female servicemembers in a unit, for example, would make it difficult for the women to succeed. “You want to have assimilation … so our females can mentor one another,” Amos said.

“Difficult for women to succeed.”  We wouldn’t want that.  After all, that’s what the military is there for – to allow women to succeed.

I’ve already discussed my own (and my son’s) view of women in combat.  I can’t add that much to it except to say that it’s the most stupid social project the American progressives have ever conceived.  But let someone else tell you that as well.

America has been creeping closer and closer to allowing women in combat, so Wednesday’s news that the decision has now been made is not a surprise. It appears that female soldiers will be allowed on the battlefield but not in the infantry. Yet it is a distinction without much difference: Infantry units serve side-by-side in combat with artillery, engineers, drivers, medics and others who will likely now include women. The Pentagon would do well to consider realities of life in combat as it pushes to mix men and women on the battlefield.

Many articles have been written regarding the relative strength of women and the possible effects on morale of introducing women into all-male units. Less attention has been paid to another aspect: the absolutely dreadful conditions under which grunts live during war.

Most people seem to believe that the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have merely involved driving out of a forward operating base, patrolling the streets, maybe getting in a quick firefight, and then returning to the forward operating base and its separate shower facilities and chow hall. The reality of modern infantry combat, at least the portion I saw, bore little resemblance to this sanitized view.I served in the 2003 invasion of Iraq as a Marine infantry squad leader. We rode into war crammed in the back of amphibious assault vehicles. They are designed to hold roughly 15 Marines snugly; due to maintenance issues, by the end of the invasion we had as many as 25 men stuffed into the back. Marines were forced to sit, in full gear, on each other’s laps and in contorted positions for hours on end. That was the least of our problems.

The invasion was a blitzkrieg. The goal was to move as fast to Baghdad as possible. The column would not stop for a lance corporal, sergeant, lieutenant, or even a company commander to go to the restroom. Sometimes we spent over 48 hours on the move without exiting the vehicles. We were forced to urinate in empty water bottles inches from our comrades.

Many Marines developed dysentery from the complete lack of sanitary conditions. When an uncontrollable urge hit a Marine, he would be forced to stand, as best he could, hold an MRE bag up to his rear, and defecate inches from his seated comrade’s face.

During the invasion, we wore chemical protective suits because of the fear of chemical or biological weapon attack. These are equivalent to a ski jumpsuit and hold in the heat. We also had to wear black rubber boots over our desert boots. On the occasions the column did stop, we would quickly peel off our rubber boots, desert boots and socks to let our feet air out.

Due to the heat and sweat, layers of our skin would peel off our feet. However, we rarely had time to remove our suits or perform even the most basic hygiene. We quickly developed sores on our bodies.

When we did reach Baghdad, we were in shambles. We had not showered in well over a month and our chemical protective suits were covered in a mixture of filth and dried blood. We were told to strip and place our suits in pits to be burned immediately. My unit stood there in a walled-in compound in Baghdad, naked, sores dotted all over our bodies, feet peeling, watching our suits burn. Later, they lined us up naked and washed us off with pressure washers.

And what sensible women wouldn’t want something like that?  So that women can experience the ultimate thrill of being shot at, going a month without a bath, getting their limbs blown off, and defecating near the faces of their colleagues, the evisceration of the U.S. military continues unabated so that the social engineers can have a legacy.

It’s a great country.

Trackbacks & Pingbacks


  1. On January 31, 2013 at 3:51 am, George said:

    I’ve been an Army Reserve MP for 14 years and have deployed three times. Each deployment, my unit has lost female Soldiers to pregnancy. These are loses that are never replaced. So guys pick up the slack.

    I’ll be honest. It is a freaking nightmare to have women in my squad. When I was in Iraq, a female Soldier threw a clamshell of food against the wall and called my NCOIC a “faggot bitch” in front of several other Soldiers and about a dozen Iraqi’s. Oh, and did I mention the Iraqi’s were detainees? Nothing happened to her. Why? Because Army females are almost untouchable (in the discipline sense, not the get preggers on deployment sense). That is a lesson I would learn the hard way a few years later. I had a problem female Soldier who, because of her conduct and absolute and total lack of work ethic was absolutely destroying the morale of all the other troops. I would have rather been short handed than have her on shift. I tried to take corrective measures and the result? I got a visit from my PSG who accused me of playing favorites. And a nice little EO complaint. I gave up. I avoided her for the rest of deployment – hard to do since we were on the same shift.

    The worst are the ones that are sorta cute but are deployment hot. They somehow convice guys to work extra shifts for them. I knew a few girls who called their little crew the “Career Killers,” because they collected at least a few scalps. In fact, I have had two commanders, a 1SG and a few SFCs relieved of duty because of their (aleged) extra carricular activites. That is really good for combat readyness.

    Another bonus of serving with females? The rape prevention classes, mandatory of course. These are fun little propaganda seminars where everyone with a penis is considered to be a criminal, just looking to drug and rape a chick. And they wonder why young men in the military commit suicide? Since birth, our boys have been treated like shit and it doesn’t stop in the military.

    How about unit cohesion? Well, there was one on again, off again couple that made life hell for pretty much every NCO in the unit. Between his jealousy, her taunting flirtations with every swinging Richard in the AO and the twenty or thirty phone calls each day, it was tough for either one to be productive. And he was an NCO. How was he able to do his job when his entire day was spent checking up on the misses? Lets add sex into the equation. Say my MP company is one hundred guys, twenty girls – just to keep the math easy. Ten of those girls are married. In my experience, eight of those ten will cheat on their husbands. All ten of the single females will be in a relationship with someone in the unit. For this exercise, we will keep it in house. Assuming all the females having sex are with Soldiers in their unit, that means about 18 guys are having sex. 82 are not. Do you know how petty young men can get when they arent getting any but a married SSG is plowing his way thru the units females? Does that sexual frustration and envy help morale?

    How about leadership? Well, on my last deployment, our 1LT (who took the place of a CPT who was relieved for an alleged relationship with a “Career Killer.”) and our 1SG spent a good chunk of each day dealing with getting pregnant females home, mediating relationships, making sure all the Joes went to the latest sexual harassment training, rape prevention training, etc. So good luck just performing the mission.

    Right now, military females are in a win – win situation. They get the same benefits as a guy, don’t have to do the same work, can get pregnant (I know a female MP in Texas who has been pregnant three times on a five year contract – unmarried, of course) and they are treated better than every other Joe.

    Women have and never will be held to the same standards as men. Most proffessional miliatry my ass. We are screwed.

  2. On January 31, 2013 at 9:46 am, Jean said:

    As I recall, our Brigade deployed to Desert Shield with about 50 women, half never made it to the “Storm”- they were returned stateside, for a variety of reasons, most were pregnant.

  3. On January 31, 2013 at 9:54 am, Rich Buckley said:

    On the other hand the new terms of service will offer plenty of comedic material in the years to come.

    Dave Letterman: Finally! There will be someone in the tank who will stop and ask for directions.

  4. On January 31, 2013 at 12:06 pm, Jean said:

    I have perfect Pre qualification test for screening prospective female candidates. Have a fire Team of 5 soldiers, gender neutral.
     Airlift them to a 6000 ft evaluation at night
     Incapacitate the heaviest member of the team
     Have the fire team carry the “wounded soldier” to an approved MEDVAC site – downhill- 4000 feet
     Each fire team member will carry their IBA and standard combat load- 100-120 LBS
     During the evac, the team will react to SAF
     During the evac the team will administer life saving first aid to the wounded soldier
     After the evac is complete, the fire team will move back to its position, engage the enemy and complete the mission. That’s the is reality of combat- a day in life of infantry in the mountains of N2K, no helicopters, no MRAPs, Just you and your gear. I would also recommend that everyone review “Small Unit Actions in Afghanistan” – Imagine those actions with blended units. I have upmost respect for any soldier in that has served our country in a combat , but riding in MRAP on convoy duty or manning an EPC is not the same as combat situations faced by our front line units.

  5. On January 31, 2013 at 12:18 pm, Herschel Smith said:


    I wasn’t going to say anything about it because I don’t want readers to think that I don’t have the utmost respect for those who have seen combat, like you do.

    But there is a difference between mechanized warfare (and I know that the Army has opted in favor of Striker-style warfare) as opposed to infantry foot-based warfare, and especially long term, protracted duration expeditionary warfare.

  6. On January 31, 2013 at 2:12 pm, Jean said:

    The Striker is a great platform and its suite of electronics made it an excellent counter insurgency weapon in Iraq, not sure about its performance in Afghanistan. The “light units” would fall in HUMVs or MRAPs in Afghanistan. Normally an infantry company travels by LPC. The Insurgency starts at the end of the road-being FOB and vehicle bound was huge miscalculation on our part. Honestly, we need to pack up and come home

  7. On January 31, 2013 at 2:21 pm, Herschel Smith said:

    Sorry, I guess I should have spelled it “Stryker.” And this is why Marine infantry doesn’t like mechanized and makes their grunts do 20 miles humps in full gear in prep for deployment.

    But the Army did it too, e.g., in the Korengal. Hey, BTW, I don’t think there were any women in the Korengal.


  8. On January 31, 2013 at 2:44 pm, Jean said:

    Not sure about the spelling, I have seen it both ways. So some Korengal History, there were females sprinkled through out the forces used in “Mountain Lion” March/April 2006. On a sad note, a stellar young Army medic worked at in Korengal in August of 2006, she was to help with the outreach to Afghan females. Her unit was ambushed at the mouth of Korengal Valley during the exfil. QRF was also hit, long sad day. I hope the GO’s and POTUS are ready to face the parents. It’s easy to make a political correct decision to appease your supporters and get some good press, it’s harder to live the second and third order consequences.

  9. On January 31, 2013 at 5:13 pm, Travis said:

    I served three tours as an infantry officer in Iraq. I fought in hard combat. In Najaf, in August 2004, I didn’t shower the whole month. We crapped on the floors in rooms of the buildings in which we lived. For the first few days, we were limited to about a liter or two of water a day (it was over 120 degrees out). Yeah, your son’s description sounds familiar. We too were mechanized (M2A3 Bradleys).

    I have always considered it an obligation for a man to serve his country, especially in a time of combat. Right or wrong, a man has to show that he is willing to serve in the defense of his society. In America, we count on our government being right, even when it isn’t. I’ve always loved the American foot soldier, even as a boy. For the sake of the infantrymen, I supported my country’s military. Now, I think that we need to reconsider our unconditional support for the military. The Army, USMC, USN and USAF will now more resemble the MP platoon described (that too sounds familiar – a USMA classmate of mine who is a female made sport of letting her men know she was “available” to them; that’s your tax dollars at work educating our “finest” women). I can no longer support such an institution that is bent on destroying the values for which I fought. Nor will I ever encourage my son to enlist. I’ll do a better job of making him a man. And if I have a daughter, I’ll be the first to send her to Canada or South America before she is ever drafted. If she were to enlist, she won’t be welcome in my home.

    The U.S. military is now a political tool. It is no longer worthy of material or moral support.

  10. On January 31, 2013 at 8:14 pm, Herschel Smith said:


    Make sure you know that the link I give discussing my son’s view of women in combat is from him, NOT the WSJ article (which my son read, and said, yep, that’s right – and then proceeded to tell me things from his own experience that added to the WSJ report but not reported herein). But the man in the WSJ article is not my son. My son was in Fallujah in 2007. The first day he showed up he and the other Marines were laying down on their backs passing sandbags over their heads to construct the walls of FOB Reaper, while being shot at.

    Different subject. I see the network domain from which you are writing. For my readers, Travis’ comment is legitimate. That you sir for your heart-felt perspectives. My best to you.

  11. On January 31, 2013 at 8:56 pm, Cal said:

    I have to look at it like this. This is just political correctness coming out. It’s not a good idea, we didn’t eliminate the problems, we just stamped it with a go ahead stamp and rolled it out to the public. Women do not have the same capabilities as men. Fact. Even still…we don’t drink in the ME so that we don’t piss off the muslims….now we’re sending women against them. We’ll be lucky if the whole ME doesn’t unify against us after that sort of insult.

  12. On January 31, 2013 at 10:44 pm, George said:

    Travis is right on, and that makes me very sad. The military was the last government institution that I had faith in, but after serving and seeing what I have seen, no longer. One thing that really frustrates me is that the professional organizations I am a member of (AUSA, NCOA and the Military Police Regimental Association) have silently watched our standards erode. Of course, each issue does tout the importance of various expensive weapons systems. Apparently vehicles will fight and win the wars of the future, not warriors.

    What also frustrates me is that so many of those pushing for allowing women into Combat Arms have no stake in the game. GEN Dempsey will not have to pay the price of his failure. The 1LT and CPT in combat will. But, at least GEN Dempsey will feel good about himself.

    I argue with my father – a big liberal – about this stuff all the time. He’s one of those guys who thinks the military is made of interchangeable cogs, like every other government job. To want to serve in the military requires that you have respect for the culture that the military defends. I’m not sure I ahve that respect anymore.

    David Hackworth is currently spinning in his grave.

  13. On February 1, 2013 at 4:03 pm, Travis said:


    Where I currently work I see this on a daily basis. It’s hard to stay sane, honestly. You hit the nail on the head with the military’s obsession with toys, not men. I work with Ft. Benning on acquisitions and analysis. There has not been one peep from them about this. But they’ll spend all day telling you how important it is to buy 100 more pounds of lightweight crap, and how computer games are better training tools than an E-6 in the woods with his snuffies!

    Don’t get me started on AUSA, and the Infantry Association (of which I am a life member). All they want to do is talk to Congress about gadgets and pay raises.

    Back in 2000 two Rangers ruck marched from Ft. Benning to Washington D.C. over a fucking hat. Does anyone remember this? Don’t get me wrong, black berets for everyone are gay. But when homosexuals are shoved down our throat and now women in combat arms, who is rucking to D.C. over something that will destroy our fighting culture?

    Thanks for the supportive comments. I thought I might get raked over the coals for my reluctance to support our “non-gender specific, non-sexual preference specific peoples in uniforms”.

    “For rising generations it will become a real problem at what point the policies you are ordered to carry out have become so iniquitous that a decent man must seek some other profession…” C.S. Lewis

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

You are currently reading "Developments Concerning Women In Combat", entry #9883 on The Captain's Journal.

This article is filed under the category(s) Army,Special Forces,Women in Combat and was published January 30th, 2013 by Herschel Smith.

If you're interested in what else the The Captain's Journal has to say, you might try thumbing through the archives and visiting the main index, or; perhaps you would like to learn more about TCJ.

26th MEU (10)
Abu Muqawama (12)
ACOG (2)
ACOGs (1)
Afghan National Army (36)
Afghan National Police (17)
Afghanistan (704)
Afghanistan SOFA (4)
Agriculture in COIN (3)
AGW (1)
Air Force (40)
Air Power (10)
al Qaeda (83)
Ali al-Sistani (1)
America (22)
Ammunition (279)
Animals (295)
Ansar al Sunna (15)
Anthropology (3)
Antonin Scalia (1)
AR-15s (375)
Arghandab River Valley (1)
Arlington Cemetery (2)
Army (87)
Assassinations (2)
Assault Weapon Ban (29)
Australian Army (7)
Azerbaijan (4)
Backpacking (3)
Badr Organization (8)
Baitullah Mehsud (21)
Basra (17)
BATFE (224)
Battle of Bari Alai (2)
Battle of Wanat (18)
Battle Space Weight (3)
Bin Laden (7)
Blogroll (3)
Blogs (24)
Body Armor (23)
Books (3)
Border War (18)
Brady Campaign (1)
Britain (38)
British Army (35)
Camping (5)
Canada (17)
Castle Doctrine (1)
Caucasus (6)
Center For a New American Security (8)
Charity (3)
China (16)
Christmas (16)
CIA (30)
Civilian National Security Force (3)
Col. Gian Gentile (9)
Combat Outposts (3)
Combat Video (2)
Concerned Citizens (6)
Constabulary Actions (3)
Coolness Factor (3)
COP Keating (4)
Corruption in COIN (4)
Council on Foreign Relations (1)
Counterinsurgency (218)
DADT (2)
David Rohde (1)
Defense Contractors (2)
Department of Defense (210)
Department of Homeland Security (26)
Disaster Preparedness (5)
Distributed Operations (5)
Dogs (15)
Donald Trump (27)
Drone Campaign (4)
EFV (3)
Egypt (12)
El Salvador (1)
Embassy Security (1)
Enemy Spotters (1)
Expeditionary Warfare (17)
F-22 (2)
F-35 (1)
Fallujah (17)
Far East (3)
Fathers and Sons (2)
Favorite (1)
Fazlullah (3)
FBI (39)
Featured (189)
Federal Firearms Laws (18)
Financing the Taliban (2)
Firearms (1,781)
Football (1)
Force Projection (35)
Force Protection (4)
Force Transformation (1)
Foreign Policy (27)
Fukushima Reactor Accident (6)
Ganjgal (1)
Garmsir (1)
general (15)
General Amos (1)
General James Mattis (1)
General McChrystal (44)
General McKiernan (6)
General Rodriguez (3)
General Suleimani (9)
Georgia (19)
Google (1)
Gulbuddin Hekmatyar (1)
Gun Control (1,653)
Guns (2,321)
Guns In National Parks (3)
Haditha Roundup (10)
Haiti (2)
Haqqani Network (9)
Hate Mail (8)
Hekmatyar (1)
Heroism (5)
Hezbollah (12)
High Capacity Magazines (16)
High Value Targets (9)
Homecoming (1)
Homeland Security (3)
Horses (2)
Humor (72)
Hunting (36)
ICOS (1)
IEDs (7)
Immigration (108)
India (10)
Infantry (4)
Information Warfare (4)
Infrastructure (4)
Intelligence (23)
Intelligence Bulletin (6)
Iran (171)
Iraq (379)
Iraq SOFA (23)
Islamic Facism (64)
Islamists (98)
Israel (19)
Jaish al Mahdi (21)
Jalalabad (1)
Japan (3)
Jihadists (81)
John Nagl (5)
Joint Intelligence Centers (1)
JRTN (1)
Kabul (1)
Kajaki Dam (1)
Kamdesh (9)
Kandahar (12)
Karachi (7)
Kashmir (2)
Khost Province (1)
Khyber (11)
Knife Blogging (7)
Korea (4)
Korengal Valley (3)
Kunar Province (20)
Kurdistan (3)
Language in COIN (5)
Language in Statecraft (1)
Language Interpreters (2)
Lashkar-e-Taiba (2)
Law Enforcement (6)
Lawfare (14)
Leadership (6)
Lebanon (6)
Leon Panetta (2)
Let Them Fight (2)
Libya (14)
Lines of Effort (3)
Littoral Combat (8)
Logistics (50)
Long Guns (1)
Lt. Col. Allen West (2)
Marine Corps (280)
Marines in Bakwa (1)
Marines in Helmand (67)
Marjah (4)
Media (68)
Medical (146)
Memorial Day (6)
Mexican Cartels (41)
Mexico (61)
Michael Yon (6)
Micromanaging the Military (7)
Middle East (1)
Military Blogging (26)
Military Contractors (5)
Military Equipment (25)
Militia (9)
Mitt Romney (3)
Monetary Policy (1)
Moqtada al Sadr (2)
Mosul (4)
Mountains (25)
MRAPs (1)
Mullah Baradar (1)
Mullah Fazlullah (1)
Mullah Omar (3)
Musa Qala (4)
Music (25)
Muslim Brotherhood (6)
Nation Building (2)
National Internet IDs (1)
National Rifle Association (95)
NATO (15)
Navy (30)
Navy Corpsman (1)
NCOs (3)
News (1)
NGOs (3)
Nicholas Schmidle (2)
Now Zad (19)
NSA (3)
NSA James L. Jones (6)
Nuclear (62)
Nuristan (8)
Obama Administration (221)
Offshore Balancing (1)
Operation Alljah (7)
Operation Khanjar (14)
Ossetia (7)
Pakistan (165)
Paktya Province (1)
Palestine (5)
Patriotism (7)
Patrolling (1)
Pech River Valley (11)
Personal (73)
Petraeus (14)
Pictures (1)
Piracy (13)
Pistol (4)
Pizzagate (21)
Police (654)
Police in COIN (3)
Policy (15)
Politics (975)
Poppy (2)
PPEs (1)
Prisons in Counterinsurgency (12)
Project Gunrunner (20)
PRTs (1)
Qatar (1)
Quadrennial Defense Review (2)
Quds Force (13)
Quetta Shura (1)
RAND (3)
Recommended Reading (14)
Refueling Tanker (1)
Religion (493)
Religion and Insurgency (19)
Reuters (1)
Rick Perry (4)
Rifles (1)
Roads (4)
Rolling Stone (1)
Ron Paul (1)
ROTC (1)
Rules of Engagement (75)
Rumsfeld (1)
Russia (37)
Sabbatical (1)
Sangin (1)
Saqlawiyah (1)
Satellite Patrols (2)
Saudi Arabia (4)
Scenes from Iraq (1)
Second Amendment (675)
Second Amendment Quick Hits (2)
Secretary Gates (9)
Sharia Law (3)
Shura Ittehad-ul-Mujahiden (1)
SIIC (2)
Sirajuddin Haqqani (1)
Small Wars (72)
Snipers (9)
Sniveling Lackeys (2)
Soft Power (4)
Somalia (8)
Sons of Afghanistan (1)
Sons of Iraq (2)
Special Forces (28)
Squad Rushes (1)
State Department (23)
Statistics (1)
Sunni Insurgency (10)
Support to Infantry Ratio (1)
Supreme Court (57)
Survival (186)
SWAT Raids (57)
Syria (38)
Tactical Drills (38)
Tactical Gear (14)
Taliban (168)
Taliban Massing of Forces (4)
Tarmiyah (1)
TBI (1)
Technology (21)
Tehrik-i-Taliban (78)
Terrain in Combat (1)
Terrorism (96)
Thanksgiving (13)
The Anbar Narrative (23)
The Art of War (5)
The Fallen (1)
The Long War (20)
The Surge (3)
The Wounded (13)
Thomas Barnett (1)
Transnational Insurgencies (5)
Tribes (5)
TSA (25)
TSA Ineptitude (14)
TTPs (4)
U.S. Border Patrol (6)
U.S. Border Security (19)
U.S. Sovereignty (24)
UAVs (2)
UBL (4)
Ukraine (10)
Uncategorized (98)
Universal Background Check (3)
Unrestricted Warfare (4)
USS Iwo Jima (2)
USS San Antonio (1)
Uzbekistan (1)
V-22 Osprey (4)
Veterans (3)
Vietnam (1)
War & Warfare (415)
War & Warfare (41)
War Movies (4)
War Reporting (21)
Wardak Province (1)
Warriors (6)
Waziristan (1)
Weapons and Tactics (79)
West Point (1)
Winter Operations (1)
Women in Combat (21)
WTF? (1)
Yemen (1)

July 2024
June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006

about · archives · contact · register

Copyright © 2006-2024 Captain's Journal. All rights reserved.