Senate Targets the NFA
BY Herschel Smith
3 weeks, 1 day ago
Via an email from long time 2A warrior Dave Hardy.
“Which deletes suppressors, SBSs, SBRs, and AOWs from the NFA, and seems to fix the DD problem with shotguns.”
What a novel idea. Undo the abomination done to us legislatively with legislation.
On the other hand, there are many miles to go before anyone sleeps on this.
|
|
On June 16, 2025 at 9:39 pm, Dan said:
Not holding my breath.
On June 17, 2025 at 4:26 am, dave in pa. said:
oh, yeah. I can see the dims are going to have problems with this.
and then they bitch about losing the tax money it brings in as well.
mass shooters and whatever will love it, or so they will say.
On June 22, 2025 at 5:21 am, Joe Blow said:
I WAS RIGHT!!!
The 9th circuit court agrees with me! Now we need to get a lawyer to invalidate every other firearm restriction based on this precedent.
The 9th circuit court just struck down a California gun law
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/ninth-circuit-strikes-down-californias-1-30-gun-rationing-law
In their own words:
And not only is “Arms” stated in the plural, but this term refers to more than just guns. It includes other weapons and instruments used for defense. See id. at 581. California’s interpretation would mean that the Second Amendment only protects possession of a single weapon of any kind. There is no basis for interpreting the constitutional text in that way
Goodbye NFA, goodbye AWB, goodbye magazine restrictions, etc., etc., etc. “Arms”, not muskets and breakopen action cartridge rifles – Arms, to include bombs, tanks, and fighter jets that weren’t invented yet. THATS WHY THEY USED THAT WORD!!
And the 9th circuit court agrees with me!
Now ‘splain to those judges what “shall not be infringed” means, and we can invalidate every miserable gun law on the books!