The main conclusion is that this is a decent budget AR. He put it through what looked like a fairly comprehensive torture test, although I don’t know how many AR-15s or what brands he has put through the test.
The Obama administration on Wednesday announced a series of specifications for smart-gun manufacturers, born out of the president’s January executive action aimed at curbing gun violence.
But there’s a catch to the new set of guidelines: They’re voluntary.
“This project was designed to spur the growth of enhanced gun safety technology – and not to mandate that any particular individual or law enforcement agency adopt the technology once developed,” the Department of Justice wrote in a blog post.
That’s not a blog post. They don’t allow comments.
Smart-gun guidelines. Voluntary. Probably because they couldn’t go through the rule making fast enough to force it on federal employees (the only people they have control over short of law making by Congress).
But take note that your tax dollars have been spent on developing this wasteful foolishness. They just couldn’t convince the law makers to go along with it, but they wanted to publish this anyway.
This is what collectivist lame duck looks like. Still controlling, but powerless and frustrated. Pathetic. Worthy of ridicule.
This is interesting, and from what I see, he is advocating a sort of admixture of forward aggressive and modified Weaver. I’ll have to try it to see what I think because I lean forward more than he recommends.
See the picture here. As you know, the Muslim Brotherhood is a terrorist organization who promotes evil things like Jihad against Christians, forcible Sharia law and female circumcision.
So ask yourself if you own a Twitter account. Why? Why would anyone in their right mind own an account at such an outfit as that. Technically I do to promote my own posts, but it is inactive. I had thought about making a number of posts to see if I can get banned, like “Twitter sucks,” “Twitter aligns with Muslim terrorists,” Twitter promotes female circumcision,” and so on. But I won’t waste my time on them. They’re going down the tubes anyway.
If you’re connected, disconnect immediately. You don’t want to be on the ship when it goes down. If not, then good. I don’t have a Facebook account either because they suck.
President-elect Donald Trump is considering several retired military generals as possible picks to be secretary of defense, people knowledgeable about the transition process said.
Retired Marine Gen. James Mattis, a former war commander who has long voiced concerns about the security threat posed by Iran, is among those being considered. Gen. Mattis is expected to visit with Mr. Trump in New Jersey, transition officials said Friday.
Also under consideration is retired Army Gen. David Petraeus, a former commander of troops in Iraq and Afghanistan. Army Gen. Jack Keane, who has been advising the campaign, also has been in discussions and met with the president-elect on Thursday, transition officials said.
Donald, please stop listening to Jack Keane, and choose Mattis. Please don’t put David Petraeus in that chair. You’ll regret it if you do.
The only thing better than having Mattis would be for him to go to Washington, make Ashton Carter pull his pants down in front of the Pentagon, and whip him with a belt until he sobs. Do it because he deserves it for trying to force women into SpecOps, and for trying to force women through the Marine Corps infantry officer school at Quantico (all of them so far have ended up with pelvic fractures or breaks), and for focusing defense dollars on sensitivity training and coming out parties at the Pentagon.
When Nabanita De scrolled through her Facebook feed recently, she felt afraid. There were so many posts with competing information and accusations about Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton that she didn’t know how to begin deciphering the fearmongering from the reality.
The social media site has faced criticism since the presidential election for its role in disseminating fake and misleading stories that are indistinguishable from real news. Because Facebook’s algorithm is designed to determine what its individual users want to see, people often see only that which validates their existing beliefs regardless of whether the information being shared is true.
So when De, an international second-year master’s student at the University of Massachusetts at Amherst, attended a hackathon at Princeton University this week with a simple prompt to develop a technology project in 36 hours, she suggested to her three teammates that they try to build an algorithm that authenticates what is real and what is fake on Facebook.
And they were able to do it.
De, with Anant Goel, a freshman at Purdue University, and Mark Craft and Qinglin Chen, sophomores at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, built a Chrome browser extension that tags links in Facebook feeds as verified or not verified by taking into account factors such as the source’s credibility and cross-checking the content with other news stories. Where a post appears to be false, the plug-in will provide a summary of more credible information on the topic online.
They’ve called it FiB.
Since the students developed it in only a day and a half (and have classes and schoolwork to worry about), they’ve released it as an “open-source project,” asking anyone with development experience to help them improve it. The plugin is available for download to the public, but the demand was so great that their limited operation couldn’t handle it.
So you’ve learned absolutely nothing from this “article.” Perhaps it ought to be relegated to the bin of fake news. Consider for a moment what you’ve witnessed over the last several days. Reporters are sitting in the bottom of Trump tower watching to see who enters the building and goes up the elevator. For hours, and hours, and hours. Perhaps they could liven it up a bit and add spice to this “news” by telling us the favorite colors of the folks riding the elevator.
What you’re witnessing is the result of the death of investigative reporting. For the “reporters” and news “editors” out there, why don’t you go to Iraq and do some reporting on what the Muslims have done to the Christian church in Mesopotamia? Oh, I see. That might involve going to Mosul. Does that frighten you? Are you scared? It should, and you should be.
Or why don’t you travel to Haiti to investigate why a budding anthropologist headed there to study the child kidnapping and pedophilia ring born out of Haiti and its relationship to the Clinton foundation, only to turn up dead under suspicious circumstances? Is that scary to you? Bless your heart.
Or why don’t you investigate why a pizzeria in Washington. D.C., owned by James Alefantis, called Comet Ping Pong, and associated with the Podesta brothers, advertised as “family friendly,” has drag shows? Or why don’t you investigate what Wikileaks shows about the relationship between the Clinton Foundation and its corollary of massive corruption? Is that scary to you? Are you afraid you’ll end up like Seth Rich?
Yea, I would be too. That’s why I carry guns. But you progressives don’t believe in those things, so there’s that.
Look, for those who haven’t learned this yet, there is no news being reported by the MSM any more. All investigative journalism is being done by 4Chan and Reddit. It is a dead art within the MSM. If you aren’t studying the results of the analysis at Reddit, you don’t know anything about the news. For the MSM to try to tell us anything about fake news is pathetic.
As for what Wikileaks tells us, they only release raw data. Others do the analysis. Wikileaks has been proven accurate and above reproach for a decade. If you’re going to try to tell us that Wikileaks is not real, you’re calling black white and white black. You’re embarrassing yourself, and you’re possibly too stupid to know it.
In summary, I can’t say it better than Paul Joseph Watson.
Owners of Remington’s popular Model 700 rifle can now examine for themselves literally millions of pages of internal company documents that have led critics to conclude that the guns are unsafe.
The documents — more than 130,000 files in all — have been assembled in a searchable online database by the advocacy group Public Justice. The organization, which battles against secrecy in the courts, fought successfully last year to make the documents public.
“These documents show the extreme danger of court secrecy,” said Public Justice Chairman Arthur Bryant. “They prove that court secrecy kills. Literally.”
With millions sold since the design first went on the market in the 1940s, Remington claims its Model 700 is the best-selling bolt-action rifle ever made. But lawsuits have alleged that for decades the company covered up a deadly design flaw that allows the guns to fire without the trigger being pulled, resulting in dozens of deaths and hundreds of injuries. The company has denied the allegations.
The documents show Remington engineers wrestling with what they called a “very dangerous” situation as early as 1947 — before the guns went on sale. Company officials eventually decided that a design change was not worth the added cost, a conclusion they would reach again and again.
We’ve discussed this at length before. While shooters are responsible for following all of the rules of safety, firearms manufacturers are responsible for designing and producing firearms that don’t discharge a round when the trigger isn’t being pulled. It’s called “defense in depth.”
Take a look at the incredible cache of documents there. It’s staggering. As I’ve said before to firearms manufacturers, when you find problems you’d better admit them and get out in front of the problem, recall it, announce it, and fix it.
Engineers, don’t ever sacrifice your ethical integrity at the behest of corporate lawyers. You say, “But this pertains to my career and this is a very difficult decision to make, and it could affect my ability to support my family.” Yes it does, and yes it may.
That’s why it’s call ethics. It isn’t ethics when it’s easy. Been there, done that. I know what it’s like.
Director of National Intelligence James Clapper told the House Select Committee on Intelligence Thursday he had submitted his letter of resignation on Wednesday night.
“(I) submitted my letter of resignation last night, which felt pretty good,” he said before the panel of lawmakers, in response to the top Democrat on the panel joking he hoped he would stick around for another four years.
“I have 64 days left and I’d have a pretty hard time with my wife going past that,” Clapper told California Rep. Adam Schiff, who also paid his respects to Clapper’s service as the hearing opened.
Well then, let me pay my very own respects. Good riddance, you disgusting worm. You almost certainly knew all about this, and you did and said nothing. And you almost certainly knew all about this, and you did and said absolutely nothing.
I hope you sit in your retirement and ponder working for an evil monster like Obama, and I hope you ponder your own moral failings for a very long time.