Marines Headed To Libya To Reinforce Security

BY Herschel Smith
12 years, 3 months ago

From the AP:

U.S. officials say some 50 Marines are being sent to Libya to reinforce security at U.S. diplomatic facilities in the aftermath of an attack in the eastern city of Benghazi that killed the U.S. ambassador and three American members of his staff.

The Marines are members of an elite group known as a Fleet Antiterrorism Security Team, whose role is to respond on short notice to terrorism threats and to reinforce security at U.S. embassies. They operate worldwide.

The officials who disclosed the plan to send the Marines spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly.

There’s that word I don’t like again: “elite.”  You can disagree if you wish, but I think this is wrongheaded.  We don’t need “elite” forces, any more than we need “elite” SWAT team members when there’s a call for help in the typical American city, any more than we need “elite” law enforcement officers to come and rescue us in the case of threats rather than defend ourselves.

We need firepower.  We need an infantry mentality.  My son observed one day to me that with a Squad Automatic Weapon (SAW) gunner laying down area suppressive fire, the leader with M203 40mm grenade launcher under his M4, and two other Marines with M4s or M16s providing defense of the SAW and leader, the typical Marine Corps infantry fire team can lay down an awful lot of effective fire, especially when conducting squad rushes or room clearing.  Given three fire teams in a squad, I would think that a few squads of Marine infantry would be very capable of providing the necessary security.

With our anemic and effeminate foreign policy, we’ve ceded both Egypt and Libya to the Islamists, so it’s better to bring the Americans home.  It’s done.  Our Middle East policy has been a failure, top to bottom, side to side, front to back.  But if you must keep a staff there, the next time Islamists try to suffocate an American diplomat, let the infantry lay down enough fire to kill them all as quickly as possible.  It matters not how many there are at the gate.  If they’re there, they are a threat.  Marine infantry tactics to deal with a threat is to kill the threat with extreme violence.  They’ll think before trying that one again.

We don’t need precise elitism.  We need firepower if we’re going to place diplomats in foreign countries that we intend to cede to the Islamists.

UPDATE #1: John Jay has some thoughts.

UPDATE #2: DirtyMick, who is a former employee of the DoD, brings us this report from Reuters-Africa:

Accounts of the mayhem at the U.S. consulate, where the ambassador and a fourth American died after a chaotic protest over a film insulting to Islam, remain patchy. But two Libyan officials, including the commander of a security force which escorted the U.S. rescuers, said a later assault on a supposedly safe refuge for the diplomats appeared professionally executed.

Miscommunication which understated the number of American survivors awaiting rescue – there were 37, nearly four times as many as the Libyan commander expected – also meant survivors and rescuers found themselves short of transport to escape this second battle, delaying an eventual dawn break for the airport.

Captain Fathi al-Obeidi, whose special operations unit was ordered by Libya’s authorities to meet an eight-man force at Benghazi airport, said that after his men and the U.S. squad had found the American survivors who had evacuated the blazing consulate, the ostensibly secret location in an isolated villa came under an intense and highly accurate mortar barrage.

“I really believe that this attack was planned,” he said, adding to suggestions by other Libyan officials that at least some of the hostility towards the Americans was the work of experienced combatants. “The accuracy with which the mortars hit us was too good for any regular revolutionaries.”

[ … ]

Of the eight American troops who had come from Tripoli, one was killed and two were wounded, Obeidi said. A Libyan deputy interior minister said a second American was also killed in the attack on the safe house. It was not clear if this was a diplomat or one of the consulate’s original security detail.

“It began to rain down on us,” Obeidi told Reuters, describing the moment the attack began – just as the Libyan security force was starting up the 10 pickup trucks and sedans they had brought to ferry the Americans to the airport.

“About six mortars fell directly on the path to the villa,” he said. “During this firing, one of the marines whom I had brought with me was wounded and fell to the ground.

“As I was dragging the wounded marine to safety, some marines who were located on the roof of the villa as snipers shouted and the rest of the marines all hit the ground.

“A mortar hit the side of the house. One of the marines from the roof went flying and fell on top of us.”

Read the entire report.  Consider the things I said above in light of the facts that we can glean from this Reuters report.  First, this was a complex, well-coordinated attack.  Second, it involved machine guns, RPGs and mortars.  Third, only a squad was included in the QRF that responded to the event.  Fourth, they clearly weren’t prepared for either the initial assault or the evacuation.  Fifth, more men toting M4s wouldn’t have been an adequate reponse, and clearly aren’t adequate for future consulate security if we intend to be in this part of the world.  A well-placed mortar or RPG beats an M4 every time.  Finally, the Marines had shooters (probably designated marksmen, or guys who have been through DM training), and this wasn’t adequate.  There is only so much that good shooters can do.

Trackbacks & Pingbacks


Comments

  1. On September 12, 2012 at 1:54 pm, JeffC said:

    without giving those Marines permission to fire, sending more of them only gives the bad guys more targets …

    our problem is never firepower, its willpower …

  2. On September 12, 2012 at 1:57 pm, Herschel Smith said:

    Well, just to be precise in my view here, don’t give them ROE at all. If they cannot lay down fire if they feel threatened, then bring them all home now, including Marines doing security.

  3. On September 12, 2012 at 3:49 pm, Burk said:

    Yup, that is exactly why an “elite” team is required here.

    If the infantry-minded grunts go into a civilian area and lay down the kind of fire you speak of, we won’t have many friends in Libya or elsewhere. Some judgement is called for, presumably part of the elite equipment for those trained to work with diplomatic missions.

    Anyhow, I thought that the Republicans were all about toppling despotism around the world. Now you complain about post-depostic chaos and freedom. Methinks you complain a little too much.

  4. On September 12, 2012 at 3:58 pm, Herschel Smith said:

    Methinks you need to go and provide the security yourself. Do not put our men in harm’s way with pansy-ass ROE for people who do not want to be our friends anyway.

    People don’t respect your vision, Burk. In this part of the world, they respect force or the capability and willingness to use it.

    In the mean time, maybe you should make your views known to the boys at CNAS concerning foreign policy. They may want to hear from you. Oh yea. It’s their vision that got us into this mess to begin with (along with Obama’s – he just surrounded himself with like-minded counselors). On the other hand, they may be making for the doors in order to find a new job.

  5. On September 12, 2012 at 4:44 pm, jean said:

    Agreed, don’t send infantry to pull guard duty. The Middle East is crumbling under a wave of Muslim extremism. There will be plenty of work for Marines/Infantry in the future. The media can’t wait to blame some obscure film maker for the attack. You don’t have to look far on YouTube to find hateful material of any type or subject. More details are starting to emerge. Media is reporting this was a three hour ordeal. Look for the Obama gang to cirlce the wagons. My thought and prayers are with the familes.

  6. On September 12, 2012 at 4:58 pm, Herschel Smith said:

    Jean,

    Your disagreement is more learned than is Burk’s, who is responding out of stupidity. As for your view, , I understand it, but infantry did guard duty for many MC FOBs in the Anbar Province in 2005 – 2008. You know what AQ managed to pull off when Marines pulled guard duty for FOB Reaper (inside Fallujah) in 2007?

    Nothing.

    Did the Marines lay down fire from the FOBs and IP precincts and on patrol? You betcha. Lot’s. Enough ’till the problems went away.

    They know how to do it. The “elite” Marines going to Libya won’t go with SAWs, won’t go with ordnance, won’t go with clear ROE, won’t go with the knowledge that they are backed by an administration with a backbone, and so on. It doesn’t matter that they are “elite.” That’s a buzz word. People who use buzz words can’t be trusted and don’t know what they’re talking about.

    Oh, and I also have known some of the Marines who went through this MOS. They are the same ones who guard the nuclear missile installations in the U.S. Most of them have never seen combat and haven’t gone through any training any different from or superior to MOS 0311.

  7. On September 12, 2012 at 5:40 pm, jean said:

    I think what we all are missing in this discussion, is that the “leadership” failed to recognize the need to have a plan to transition from a standard perimeter security mission to a people protection mission. Also, no QRF or bug out plan. They failed in their threat analysis. Libya as with its neighbors to the east and west has radical elements that are aligned with AQ. Why was the AMBO in an area without proper protection? I am certainty an advocate of a sound defense, pending the resumption of offensive operations.

  8. On September 12, 2012 at 5:59 pm, DirtyMick said:

    I don’t think FAST teams are “elite” per se. From my understanding their specific duties and responsibilities are counter terror but at the end of the day they’re 03xx MOSs. Kind of a like how a bunch of heavy weapons grunts form CAAT platoons or grunts in SS platoons. They’re still grunts but they have a specific duty.
    My question is where was the security detail at the consulate?

  9. On September 12, 2012 at 6:05 pm, jean said:

    This incident is similar to an attack on a UN compound in North Afghanistan, in which 6 to 7 UN personnel were murdered by the Taliban using the riot as cover to storm the building. Local security fled or joined the protestors. Some of the attackers were later identified as former guests of the COF.

    Good question about the security detail, at least one of the KIA was a DOS staffer….so does that mean a PSD of only two?? How many survived the attack? Any POWS/MIA . There is more to this story.

  10. On September 12, 2012 at 6:54 pm, lrb said:

    Sorry to interject facts here, but a FAST is a reinforced infantry platoon, 3 big squads with snipers and assaultmen attached. It is not elite by any stretch of the imagination, security forces are open to all MOSs, not just infantry.

  11. On September 12, 2012 at 7:01 pm, Herschel Smith said:

    Oh, I don’t think for a minute that this defense was well-prepared. Of course it wasn’t. There is certainly more to the story. We just haven’t heard it yet. My main point is that sending over some “elite” troops toting M4s (even some carrying M14s as the group DM) won’t do the trick when the Islamists are carrying RPGs.

  12. On September 12, 2012 at 11:54 pm, jj said:

    Unfortunately, the FAST teams should have been sent in PRIOR, not after. Typical administration failure of being reactive while “thinking it thru” with their superior minds. And, wasn’t this consulate bombed in June?

  13. On September 13, 2012 at 2:05 am, DirtyMick said:

    Herschel this needs to be looked at…
    http://af.reuters.com/article/libyaNews/idAFL5E8KCMYB20120912?pageNumber=1&virtualBrandChannel=0

    It states that the QRF was one Marine squad sent to link up with a Libyan security element to rescue those at the consulate. So the QRF was one Marine Squad (wtf?!) with no gunship escort and some ragtag Libyans. To make matters worse nobody had an accurate count of the personnel at the consulate and they went in thinking they were getting 10 Americans as opposed to 37. They ended up running into a complex ambush with machine guns, RPGs, and very accurate mortar fire. With the accuracy of the mortars I would assume they either knew the route the QRF was going to take or they had TRPs set up.

  14. On September 13, 2012 at 8:06 am, jean said:

    DM
    An abortive rescue attempt??
    That was some excellent Intel gathering, certainly no mention of that in the main stream media. Lets see how they spin this in the next 48 It is hard to hide active duty causalities.

  15. On September 13, 2012 at 9:53 am, Cog said:

    On an AJ report they noted that there was a point in the protest where a number of heavily bearded men blocked off the streets in a coordinated fashion prior to the attack. In conjunction with the mortar information, pretty clear evidence of a planned assault.

    Also saw reports of Libyans dragging the ambassador through the streets. It deserves to be mentioned that the ambassador was carried to the hospital by Libyans, assuming it was either a member of his security detail or one of the libyan staff he worked with. Another article noted that 10 Libyan security personal died protecting the embassy. Haven’t heard much about that.

  16. On September 13, 2012 at 10:47 am, Jay Borgmann said:

    As a former Marine myself, and one who served in the Security Forces, I can tell you that FAST (Fleet AntiTerrorist Security Teams) are specially and extensively trained for this type of situation.

    Not only that, but remember that EVERY Marine is first and foremost a Rifleman / Infantryman. FAST still has the Infantry mentality, but they have special training to augment it. And do not doubt that they will have adequate fire-power for the job.

    They receive extensive CQB training and tons of range time on the weapons they carry.

    And although many in the past may have not seen combat, I bet a large majority (if not all) of the current members have served at least one rotation in Iraq or Afghanistan.

  17. On September 13, 2012 at 10:53 am, Donald Campbell said:

    In reference to the USMC FAST squad. I used to work at NWS Yorktown, that houses at least part of the FAST personnel. We used to enjoy observing them training for embassy duty.

    The training required 1/2 those participating to stand ‘guard’ over the ’embassy’. The remaining 1/2 was dressed in ‘civies’ and represented the local protesters of the embassy.

    Let me assure you, when it came to their ability to swear, the protester 1/2 of the squad are elite without peer. It is not the words they use, which we all, of course, know. Rather, it is the peerless combination of those words into truly vile phrases on which they excel. I suspect this training and the ability to dish it out make them well suited to be on the receiving end.

  18. On September 13, 2012 at 10:54 am, Jay Borgmann said:

    Herschel – It’s true that the Security Forces MOS themselves do not receive training superior to your typical infantry platoon, but FAST is not in the same category.

    They are considered a step below Force Recon, and a step above your typical infantry platoon when it comes to the training they receive. They would probably be on par with Battalion Recon (not the same as Force). A lot of specialized training, but in different areas then Recon. A lot of range time, CQB training, and anti-terrorism training.

  19. On September 13, 2012 at 10:56 am, Chap said:

    You’ve jumped on a reporter calling a FAST “elite” and gotten the wrong conclusion. As several have mentioned, this mission needs some dedicated training, but it’s not like JSOC is running an op or anything. FASTs are regionally assigned and every diplomatic post gets some kind of support like this. It’s what we’ve done for a very long time because it works when you put it in place at the right time.

  20. On September 13, 2012 at 10:59 am, Herschel Smith said:

    Jay,

    Thanks for your comments. My intent is not to insult, it is to discuss. The FAST boys that transferred into my son’s unit were in extremely good physical shape (stunningly good, in fact, almost oddly good shape, better than the Recon boys I knew), but had to be extensively retrained in CQB tactics and room clearing, as well as field and small unit maneuver combat.

    My concern is not that, per se, but the mindset that is being brought to the issue. Again, not the personnel, but the mindset. If we bring a “get some elite troopers with M4s to the rescue” mindset to the problem, they will get mowed down by RPG fire, whether infantry or FAST.

    They need more than that, and it is clear that we were caught very much with our pants down.

    Naive. Both foreign policy and security procedures.

    Naive. That’s the main point, whether said well or poorly.

  21. On September 13, 2012 at 11:01 am, Herschel Smith said:

    Chap, I’m assuming (maybe wrongly?) that the word “elite” came from the DoD source, not the reporter.

    See comment above back at Jay.

  22. On September 13, 2012 at 11:17 am, S P Dudley said:

    The FAST teams are specifically oriented to reinforce embassy security, they’re not Infantry units per se although they’re equipped with Infantry weapons and are Infantry MOS.

    We can all armchair general this thing to death but it doesn’t take a genius to see that a MEU-SOC is what’s really required for security of any and all Americans in the country. The Obama Administration, in it’s political need to make Libya look stable and secure, has been hiding the chaos in the country. I doubt they’ve got the balls to actually admin there’s a war still going on.

  23. On September 13, 2012 at 12:27 pm, Herschel Smith said:

    Another recent report:

    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/09/13/consulate-attack-planned-as-2-part-militant-assault-libyan-official-says/

  24. On September 13, 2012 at 1:33 pm, Marine Jet said:

    GET SOME FAST COMPANY!!!!! Do not hesitate to kill kill kill! Send them bastards to hell!

    Semper Fidelis!

  25. On September 13, 2012 at 2:24 pm, Herschel Smith said:

    Then there is this sad, sad report about Marines providing “security” for the Egyptian embassy not being allowed live ammunition by the State Department.

    How sad have we become.

    http://www.captainsjournal.com/2012/09/13/marines-at-american-embassy-in-egypt-not-permitted-live-ammunition/

  26. On September 13, 2012 at 4:27 pm, Sarge said:

    Not “We,” Hershel – – the feckless buffoons who are currently running the Executive branch like it’s some kind of law campus, they, THEY have proven to be sad beyond previous measure, inept, incompetent, insufferably smug, impenetrably conceited, and completely out of their depth at anything beyond electioneering and fundraising.

    They have been aided and abetted by the provision of protective coloration by the very press organs who are supposed to be constantly looking for weakness or inadequacy in our elected officials, so we the public know when it is time to replace them.

    Forcing Marines to guard an Embassy without arms… that’s just asking for them to become either martyrs or hostages, should a mob decide to press the point.

    I am without words to properly convey how disgusted I am with the Administration’s bungling. Pathetic doesn’t even come close.

  27. On September 13, 2012 at 6:33 pm, jean said:

    No photo op moments of the situation room, oh the command team was asleep, while their consulate was over run and the QRF ambushed. I am beyond being disgusted.

  28. On September 14, 2012 at 4:35 am, Peter said:

    All I know is that if they’re serious about defending a Consulate or an Embassy, which are, after all, US soil they need more than rifles. They need belt fed weapons and TOW missiles, along with large containers of Claymore mines and some bloop guns.

    Either defend them with all the fury the United States is, or at least used to be, capable of or bring everyone out of there.

  29. On September 15, 2012 at 1:19 am, Travis said:

    FYI almost the entire fast platoon are grunts.

  30. On September 15, 2012 at 6:00 am, dan rodriguez said:

    here we go again .. what we need over there is a gung -ho infantry officer that is going to lay down some suppressive fire power , destroy the target and gat close with the enemies. its like the movie Rules Of Engagement. “waste the mother Fu**kers and go home and do it again the next day.thats how grunts roll back in the day . Fu**k all the politicians just take orders from Jim Mattis … semper Fi 3/2 marine .

  31. On September 15, 2012 at 6:01 am, dan rodriguez said:

    here we go again .. what we need over there is a gung -ho infantry officer that is going to lay down some suppressive fire power , destroy the target and gat close with the enemies. its like the movie Rules Of Engagement. “waste the mother Fu**kers and go home and do it again the next day.thats how grunts roll back in the day . Fu**k all the politicians just take orders from Jim Mattis … semper Fi 3/2 marine.

  32. On September 15, 2012 at 8:51 pm, Tintin said:

    The word “elite” almost certainly came from the reporter. In the eyes of some uninformed reporters, anything that is not a standard infantry platoon — and some things that *are* standard infantry platoons — are “elite,” a special codeword that makes the story sound sexier. JSOC special mission units: elite. “White” SOF: elite. An infantry battalion’s scout platoon: elite. EOD: elite.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment


You are currently reading "Marines Headed To Libya To Reinforce Security", entry #9035 on The Captain's Journal.

This article is filed under the category(s) Foreign Policy,Marine Corps and was published September 12th, 2012 by Herschel Smith.

If you're interested in what else the The Captain's Journal has to say, you might try thumbing through the archives and visiting the main index, or; perhaps you would like to learn more about TCJ.

26th MEU (10)
Abu Muqawama (12)
ACOG (2)
ACOGs (1)
Afghan National Army (36)
Afghan National Police (17)
Afghanistan (704)
Afghanistan SOFA (4)
Agriculture in COIN (3)
AGW (1)
Air Force (40)
Air Power (10)
al Qaeda (83)
Ali al-Sistani (1)
America (22)
Ammunition (285)
Animals (297)
Ansar al Sunna (15)
Anthropology (3)
Antonin Scalia (1)
AR-15s (379)
Arghandab River Valley (1)
Arlington Cemetery (2)
Army (87)
Assassinations (2)
Assault Weapon Ban (29)
Australian Army (7)
Azerbaijan (4)
Backpacking (3)
Badr Organization (8)
Baitullah Mehsud (21)
Basra (17)
BATFE (229)
Battle of Bari Alai (2)
Battle of Wanat (18)
Battle Space Weight (3)
Bin Laden (7)
Blogroll (3)
Blogs (24)
Body Armor (23)
Books (3)
Border War (18)
Brady Campaign (1)
Britain (38)
British Army (35)
Camping (5)
Canada (17)
Castle Doctrine (1)
Caucasus (6)
CENTCOM (7)
Center For a New American Security (8)
Charity (3)
China (16)
Christmas (16)
CIA (30)
Civilian National Security Force (3)
Col. Gian Gentile (9)
Combat Outposts (3)
Combat Video (2)
Concerned Citizens (6)
Constabulary Actions (3)
Coolness Factor (3)
COP Keating (4)
Corruption in COIN (4)
Council on Foreign Relations (1)
Counterinsurgency (218)
DADT (2)
David Rohde (1)
Defense Contractors (2)
Department of Defense (210)
Department of Homeland Security (26)
Disaster Preparedness (5)
Distributed Operations (5)
Dogs (15)
Donald Trump (27)
Drone Campaign (4)
EFV (3)
Egypt (12)
El Salvador (1)
Embassy Security (1)
Enemy Spotters (1)
Expeditionary Warfare (17)
F-22 (2)
F-35 (1)
Fallujah (17)
Far East (3)
Fathers and Sons (2)
Favorite (1)
Fazlullah (3)
FBI (39)
Featured (190)
Federal Firearms Laws (18)
Financing the Taliban (2)
Firearms (1,801)
Football (1)
Force Projection (35)
Force Protection (4)
Force Transformation (1)
Foreign Policy (27)
Fukushima Reactor Accident (6)
Ganjgal (1)
Garmsir (1)
general (15)
General Amos (1)
General James Mattis (1)
General McChrystal (44)
General McKiernan (6)
General Rodriguez (3)
General Suleimani (9)
Georgia (19)
GITMO (2)
Google (1)
Gulbuddin Hekmatyar (1)
Gun Control (1,674)
Guns (2,341)
Guns In National Parks (3)
Haditha Roundup (10)
Haiti (2)
HAMAS (7)
Haqqani Network (9)
Hate Mail (8)
Hekmatyar (1)
Heroism (5)
Hezbollah (12)
High Capacity Magazines (16)
High Value Targets (9)
Homecoming (1)
Homeland Security (3)
Horses (2)
Humor (72)
Hunting (41)
ICOS (1)
IEDs (7)
Immigration (114)
India (10)
Infantry (4)
Information Warfare (4)
Infrastructure (4)
Intelligence (23)
Intelligence Bulletin (6)
Iran (171)
Iraq (379)
Iraq SOFA (23)
Islamic Facism (64)
Islamists (98)
Israel (19)
Jaish al Mahdi (21)
Jalalabad (1)
Japan (3)
Jihadists (81)
John Nagl (5)
Joint Intelligence Centers (1)
JRTN (1)
Kabul (1)
Kajaki Dam (1)
Kamdesh (9)
Kandahar (12)
Karachi (7)
Kashmir (2)
Khost Province (1)
Khyber (11)
Knife Blogging (7)
Korea (4)
Korengal Valley (3)
Kunar Province (20)
Kurdistan (3)
Language in COIN (5)
Language in Statecraft (1)
Language Interpreters (2)
Lashkar-e-Taiba (2)
Law Enforcement (6)
Lawfare (14)
Leadership (6)
Lebanon (6)
Leon Panetta (2)
Let Them Fight (2)
Libya (14)
Lines of Effort (3)
Littoral Combat (8)
Logistics (50)
Long Guns (1)
Lt. Col. Allen West (2)
Marine Corps (280)
Marines in Bakwa (1)
Marines in Helmand (67)
Marjah (4)
MEDEVAC (2)
Media (68)
Medical (146)
Memorial Day (6)
Mexican Cartels (42)
Mexico (62)
Michael Yon (6)
Micromanaging the Military (7)
Middle East (1)
Military Blogging (26)
Military Contractors (5)
Military Equipment (25)
Militia (9)
Mitt Romney (3)
Monetary Policy (1)
Moqtada al Sadr (2)
Mosul (4)
Mountains (25)
MRAPs (1)
Mullah Baradar (1)
Mullah Fazlullah (1)
Mullah Omar (3)
Musa Qala (4)
Music (25)
Muslim Brotherhood (6)
Nation Building (2)
National Internet IDs (1)
National Rifle Association (97)
NATO (15)
Navy (30)
Navy Corpsman (1)
NCOs (3)
News (1)
NGOs (3)
Nicholas Schmidle (2)
Now Zad (19)
NSA (3)
NSA James L. Jones (6)
Nuclear (63)
Nuristan (8)
Obama Administration (221)
Offshore Balancing (1)
Operation Alljah (7)
Operation Khanjar (14)
Ossetia (7)
Pakistan (165)
Paktya Province (1)
Palestine (5)
Patriotism (7)
Patrolling (1)
Pech River Valley (11)
Personal (73)
Petraeus (14)
Pictures (1)
Piracy (13)
Pistol (4)
Pizzagate (21)
Police (659)
Police in COIN (3)
Policy (15)
Politics (985)
Poppy (2)
PPEs (1)
Prisons in Counterinsurgency (12)
Project Gunrunner (20)
PRTs (1)
Qatar (1)
Quadrennial Defense Review (2)
Quds Force (13)
Quetta Shura (1)
RAND (3)
Recommended Reading (14)
Refueling Tanker (1)
Religion (495)
Religion and Insurgency (19)
Reuters (1)
Rick Perry (4)
Rifles (1)
Roads (4)
Rolling Stone (1)
Ron Paul (1)
ROTC (1)
Rules of Engagement (75)
Rumsfeld (1)
Russia (37)
Sabbatical (1)
Sangin (1)
Saqlawiyah (1)
Satellite Patrols (2)
Saudi Arabia (4)
Scenes from Iraq (1)
Second Amendment (687)
Second Amendment Quick Hits (2)
Secretary Gates (9)
Sharia Law (3)
Shura Ittehad-ul-Mujahiden (1)
SIIC (2)
Sirajuddin Haqqani (1)
Small Wars (72)
Snipers (9)
Sniveling Lackeys (2)
Soft Power (4)
Somalia (8)
Sons of Afghanistan (1)
Sons of Iraq (2)
Special Forces (28)
Squad Rushes (1)
State Department (23)
Statistics (1)
Sunni Insurgency (10)
Support to Infantry Ratio (1)
Supreme Court (62)
Survival (203)
SWAT Raids (57)
Syria (38)
Tactical Drills (38)
Tactical Gear (15)
Taliban (168)
Taliban Massing of Forces (4)
Tarmiyah (1)
TBI (1)
Technology (21)
Tehrik-i-Taliban (78)
Terrain in Combat (1)
Terrorism (96)
Thanksgiving (13)
The Anbar Narrative (23)
The Art of War (5)
The Fallen (1)
The Long War (20)
The Surge (3)
The Wounded (13)
Thomas Barnett (1)
Transnational Insurgencies (5)
Tribes (5)
TSA (25)
TSA Ineptitude (14)
TTPs (4)
U.S. Border Patrol (6)
U.S. Border Security (19)
U.S. Sovereignty (24)
UAVs (2)
UBL (4)
Ukraine (10)
Uncategorized (99)
Universal Background Check (3)
Unrestricted Warfare (4)
USS Iwo Jima (2)
USS San Antonio (1)
Uzbekistan (1)
V-22 Osprey (4)
Veterans (3)
Vietnam (1)
War & Warfare (419)
War & Warfare (41)
War Movies (4)
War Reporting (21)
Wardak Province (1)
Warriors (6)
Waziristan (1)
Weapons and Tactics (79)
West Point (1)
Winter Operations (1)
Women in Combat (21)
WTF? (1)
Yemen (1)

December 2024
November 2024
October 2024
September 2024
August 2024
July 2024
June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006

about · archives · contact · register

Copyright © 2006-2024 Captain's Journal. All rights reserved.