Coyotes aren’t a nuisance. It’s their world, and humans live in it

As much as I’ve enjoyed Sandy Banks’ columns through the years, I must take issue with her characterization of wild coyotes’ presence in her suburban neighborhood.
In truth, any “reign of terror” being perpetrated there stems from humans’ ubiquitous war on wildlife.
Banks concedes that human housing has invaded the coyotes’ natural habitat. Yet she villainizes them for adapting to our trespass.
Any “unrepentant hoodlums” are the residents who have dispossessed the coyotes; any “scourge” she perceives was wholly foreseeable, not “unpredictable.”
Rather than demonize coyotes for being coyotes, Banks should keep in mind that they aren’t able to earn a living by writing newspaper columns.
Sandra Perez, Santa Maria
Her view is irrational and inconsistent. Let me prove it to you.
Her view is likely the one of an evolutionist. Upon her view, men are animals and the Coyote is just another animal. We must all learn to live together in one gigantic utopia and men are the dastardly ones waging war on other animals.
But you see, upon the evolutionist view, there is no such thing as evil, and thus if men are just animals, men are behaving like animals when they kill other animals, as a lion would in the Serengeti desert. She has no business complaining. She’s watching nature in action.
This is what Professor Alvin Plantinga would do. He would explain how the naturalist view is self referentially incoherent and self defeating.
The proper view if that God created man in His image and gave him dominion over the animal kingdom. Dangerous animals who kill men are to be put to death, and animals who destroy your property are thieves – and your property includes your beasts as well.
Even dogs are smarter than her. They figured this out a long time ago, and they and men are friends.