Why The AR-15 Is The Most Popular Rifle In America

BY PGF
2 months, 1 week ago

Housekeeping Note: Herschel is offline this week. We’re certain that the quality of the posts will suffer, but the quality of the discussion in the comments doesn’t have to!

Source:

…After the American experience in Korea, where servicemen faced massed assault from Chinese forces, it was decided that the World War II workhorse M1 Garand rifle was no longer adequate; its low capacity and lack of full automatic fire hamstrung U.S. troops.

The Pentagon wanted a new rifle. Around the same time, there was a push among NATO members to standardize a rifle caliber to simplify wartime logistics. American design philosophies dominated both, and the Army’s parochial Ordnance Corps dominated the discussion on design. Ordnance Corps officers clung to the popular myth of the heroic American rifleman, who wins the day with a few well-aimed, long-ranged shots from a full-power rifle.

Thus, the M14 was born, as well as the new NATO bullet, 7.62x51mm. But everyone soon discovered the difficulty of controlling full-caliber rifles on full-auto; 7.62 NATO weapons quickly turned into anti-aircraft guns in longer automatic bursts, rendering the feature ineffective. These experiences were supported by the results of Project SALVO, a Pentagon research project to develop next-generation infantry weapons. SALVO concluded that a smaller bullet traveling at high velocity would be as lethal, if not more so, than big calibers like 7.62 NATO; the SALVO report recommended that the Pentagon should adopt a little-known gun called the AR-15, designed by ArmaLite engineer Eugene Stoner, and based off his earlier file design for the AR-10.

The AR-15 was unlike anything seen before: It was constructed of forged aluminum and plastics, used a direct impingement gas operating system, and was chambered in the new 5.56X45mm cartridge. It was the antithesis of the M14. Naturally, the Ordnance Corps hated it, and moved to kill the project by resorting to testing practices and emulation that were ultimately unfair to the AR-15. The weapon languished in design committee as Army traditionalists butted heads with Robert McNamara and his RAND Corporation  “whiz kids.”

The article goes on to discuss the interesting history of the AR-15 type platform.


Comments

  1. On September 26, 2022 at 12:50 am, Georgiaboy61 said:

    Re: “Ordnance Corps officers clung to the popular myth of the heroic American rifleman, who wins the day with a few well-aimed, long-ranged shots from a full-power rifle.”

    The author of the piece, Christian Beekman, uses the argumentative fallacy of “damning with faint praise,” i.e., offering only weak praise since the none is justified. It’s a bogus form of argument and it is intellectually lazy.

    I can’t help but wonder if Beekman is on the younger side, because his analysis echoes so many of the talking points of the younger set who disdain those who came before them and the choices they made, where things like this are concerned.

    In fact, the AR15 and weapons like the M-1 Garand – in other words, assault rifles and battle carbines on one hand, and battle rifles on the other – have long been and remain at the center of an important debate about how ground troops, in particularly infantry, should be armed and equipped.

    It may be a cliche in the minds of some people, but the well-aimed rifle-shot on the battlefield can indeed carry the day. Small arms are certainly not always determinative on the battlefield, but they have been in many times and places in the history of warfare and human conflict. It is precisely for that reason that it persists in the collective memory of nations like the United States and many others besides.

    Or, as the old saying goes in the debate between firepower (rounds fired/minute) and marksmanship goes, “True firepower isn’t the number of shots fired, but the number which hit the target.”

    The armed forces keep detailed statistics as accurately as they can about the battles and wars they fight. This is sometimes a tall order given the chaos and confusion which always accompany war, but the effort is made none-the-less because of the importance of lessons learned.

    According to those who track such things, marksmanship with the rifle, the standard long-arm of the infantryman – peaked around the time of the Great War (WWI) and has been declining since then. Concurrently, the number of shots fired per confirmed enemy KIA has been rising dramatically alongside that decline.
    By the time of Vietnam, it was estimated by some authorities that as many as 50,000 rounds of small-arms fire were required for one enemy kill.

    Some of this was due to the nature of the war itself, fought in such difficult terrain, and also to the fact that the Vietcong and NVA did their best not to be in the open when Uncle Sam showed up to bring the heat down on them… but much of the decline in skill was due to flawed assumptions about how wars would be fought, and simple laziness and neglect on the part of the military.

    The bright boys back in the Pentagon/DOD – Secretary of Defense McNamara and his “whiz kids” for example – decided that in the age of ballistic missiles, satellites and high-altitude bombers like the B-52, the humble rifleman no longer mattered as much in war.

    While it is inarguably true that assault rifles are useful weapons capable of filling a number of important roles on the battlefield, it is equally true that the older style of military rifle firing a full-power cartridge – the battle rifle – also has many important roles to fill in modern warfare.

    As firearms trainer/author Kenneth Royce, a.k.a. “Boston” of “Boston’s Gun Bible” states, it has long been understood that handguns don’t win wars, but if anything, the lessons of conflicts in recent decades confirm that neither do assault rifles win wars.

    The U.S. has just abandoned Afghanistan after a twenty-year effort which saw the U.S. and their coalition allies struggle to defeat Afghan tribesmen armed with antiquated Lee-Enfield .303 bolt-actions and RPGs. Sure, the “muj” used AKs, but they were also smart-enough to figure out that such weapons were less-effective beyond 300 yards/meters, and therefore sought to engage U.S.-ISAF forces beyond that range, in many cases using rifles and machine-guns firing full-power cartridges.

    And if we look further back into history, we see that skill with a rifle is often extremely important on the battlefield. The Boers gave the British Empire a very tough time in South Africa in the First and Second Boer Wars at places like the Battle of Spion Kop (23-24 January, 1900), before the British finally got their act together and won the war.

    The Boers were irregulars, largely drawn from farmers, ranchers, and others who had spent their life outdoors – but they were superbly-skilled with their individual rifles and on more than one occasion beat the professionals of the King’s army.

    The U.S. learned a similar hard lesson in the Spanish-American War during the Battle of the San Juan Heights, when Spanish and Cuban riflemen armed with Mauser 7x57mm bolt-actions extracted a heavy toll at long range upon the attacking U.S. forces before they managed finally to take the heights.

    Pretty much his first act as commander-in-chief, President Teddy Roosevelt – who’d been there – ordered that the U.S. ordnance establishment design a rifle to compete with the Mauser. The result was the excellent Springfield M1903 bolt-action 30-06, which adopted so many features from the German design that Mauser sued for patent infringement and the U.S. government ended up having to pay royalties to them.

    It is well-and-good to celebrate the virtues of Eugene Stoner and his genius for firearms design and engineering, but even he would probably agree that the AR15 (M-16) was not the answer to every tactical problem.

    Just as a skilled master craftsman or tradesman employs different tools for different jobs, so should the infantryman used different tools suited to the tasks he is trying to accomplish. The old proverb says that to a man holding a hammer, everything soon begins to look like a nail. This is no less true of proponents of the assault rifle. The trouble is, as good as that “hammer” – his M-16 – might be, that is not the only tool he needs in his toolbox.

    In parting, it is also a historical fallacy that the Garand rifle was ill-suited to the fighting in Korea 1950-1953. I can’t help but wonder if Beekman has ever even met or spoken to a man who was there. Sure doesn’t sound like it. Well, I have – quite a number of them – and there are a lot of elderly Korean War veterans around still who who would dispute his comments on the M-1 rifle.

    In fact, one of them was an uncle in my family, a army infantryman who faced Chinese human-wave attacks precisely of the kind mentioned in the article. He told me face-to-face in a conversation some years ago that he would not have made it home alive if not for his M-1 rifle. He said it never let him down.

  2. On September 26, 2022 at 1:12 am, Archer said:

    Once again, an honest reading of the history shows that the AR-15 was NOT designed as a “weapon of war”. Rather, it was designed for the civilian market, but was built well enough that the military eventually adopted a full-auto variant as their primary infantry rifle.

    Anti-gun talking points — specifically, that the semi-auto AR-15 is a “weapon of war” that was “designed to kill a lot of people as quickly as possible” — are outright falsehoods.

  3. On September 26, 2022 at 9:17 am, Drake said:

    It is a shame that Army Ordinance has a long record of picking the wrong caliber. .30-06 instead of .276 Pedersen, 7.62 / 5.56 instead of .280 British. Now this absurd new 6.8 mm round instead of something that makes sense like 6mm ARC.

    I’d love an AR in 6mm ARC or .224 Valkyrie, but I’m not buying a new rifle with hard-to-find ammo that costs well over a $1 a round.

  4. On September 26, 2022 at 9:59 am, Panhandle Frank said:

    “Anti-gun talking points — specifically, that the semi-auto AR-15 is a ‘weapon of war'”

    “Weapon of war” is a disarmist distraction, designed to conflate AR15s/M16s with RPGs and hand grenades.

    ALL firearm designs are, at the end of the day, “weapons of war,” as they have all been used by warfighters — whether uniformed armies, or guerillas, or civilian resistance. And the 2A explicitly protects “weapons of war.”

    We need to publicly lean into that fact, not shy away from it with assertions that “no army has ever issued the [insert semi-auto rifle here].”

    (And DON’T EVEN get me started on that “Modern Sporting Rifle” bullspit … )

  5. On September 26, 2022 at 5:17 pm, Georgiaboy61 said:

    @ Archer

    Re: “Once again, an honest reading of the history shows that the AR-15 was NOT designed as a “weapon of war”. Rather, it was designed for the civilian market, but was built well enough that the military eventually adopted a full-auto variant as their primary infantry rifle.”

    How do you reach that conclusion? The history of the AR15 project began with the design of the Armalite AR10,chambered in 7.62×51 NATO, which was intended to be an entrant in the army ordnance trials of the mid-1950s held to select a new service rifle for the U.S. military.

    When an experimental laminated-barrel prototype failed destructive endurance testing, and Armalite was not selected to provide the new rifle, that seemed to be the end of it. However, General Willard Wyman – head of Continental Army Command or CONARC, indirectly provided a life-jacket to the then-struggling company in the form of the “light rifle project.”

    Wyman sought bids or proposals for a lightweight select-fire weapon chambered in .22-caliber and firing a 55-grain slug at 3300 fps muzzle velocity with an effective range of 500 yards, at which distance the weapon was to penetrate a sheet steel helmet.

    Armalite decided to participate, and head engineer Eugene Stoner and his team set about downsizing the AR10 to fit this new intermediate cartridge, what ultimately became known as 5.56×45 NATO M193 Ball, or .223 Remington in civilian guise. The successful result of Stoner’s efforts was the Armalite AR15, better known as the M-16 assault rifle, under military nomenclature.

    The new rifle and its ammunition impressed United States Air Force Chief of Staff, General Curtis LeMay, who sought to procure them in order to arm his air police and base security personnel, and was also adopted and used successfully by U.S. Army Special Forces in Vietnam. Once these two early adopters were on-board, the success of the venture was assured.

    In a twist of fate however, Armalite, however, did not profit particularly – as they had by then sold the rights to their new rifle to Colt Repeating Arms of Hartford, Connecticut. For years Colt was the sole vendor of the M-16 and its derivatives, as well as civilian semi-auto only versions sold in the commercial firearms market.

    That history certainly seems pretty military-focused to me… is there something missing in this account?

  6. On September 27, 2022 at 5:50 pm, Paul B said:

    lot of ink has been wasted on this subject. Remember some boys coming back from Nam and most did not have good things to say about the matel rifle.

    I have a couple and know more about it, but I wonder if the M-14 might have been a better choice at the time.

  7. On September 28, 2022 at 1:00 pm, Panhandle Frank said:

    @Paul B

    “It’s been 50 years since the problems with the M16 were fixed, but the rifle still suffers from a legacy that it never deserved.

    “The M16 did not fail in Vietnam. On the contrary, even with its problems, it was in every possible way a vastly superior rifle to the M14.

    “Fault doesn’t rest with the M16, Stoner, or even with Colt. Instead, it lands with the officers in the U.S. Army who not only allowed the problems to occur, but ignored the designers, the men testing the rifle, and everyone in between.

    “Today, the M16 and M4 are outstandingly reliable rifles, but only because they are allowed to be.

    “Civilian AR-15s, as long as they are reasonably well made, are hands down the best rifles you can own for self-defense, competition, or bugging out.”

    https://www.pewpewtactical.com/m16-vietnam-failure/

    But what do I know? I was just a Jet Mech inn the USAF …

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment


You are currently reading "Why The AR-15 Is The Most Popular Rifle In America", entry #32141 on The Captain's Journal.

This article is filed under the category(s) AR-15s,Guns and was published September 25th, 2022 by PGF.

If you're interested in what else the The Captain's Journal has to say, you might try thumbing through the archives and visiting the main index, or; perhaps you would like to learn more about TCJ.

26th MEU (10)
Abu Muqawama (12)
ACOG (2)
ACOGs (1)
Afghan National Army (36)
Afghan National Police (17)
Afghanistan (704)
Afghanistan SOFA (4)
Agriculture in COIN (3)
AGW (1)
Air Force (40)
Air Power (10)
al Qaeda (83)
Ali al-Sistani (1)
America (22)
Ammunition (226)
Animals (203)
Ansar al Sunna (15)
Anthropology (3)
Antonin Scalia (1)
AR-15s (342)
Arghandab River Valley (1)
Arlington Cemetery (2)
Army (83)
Assassinations (2)
Assault Weapon Ban (27)
Australian Army (7)
Azerbaijan (4)
Backpacking (2)
Badr Organization (8)
Baitullah Mehsud (21)
Basra (17)
BATFE (154)
Battle of Bari Alai (2)
Battle of Wanat (18)
Battle Space Weight (3)
Bin Laden (7)
Blogroll (3)
Blogs (24)
Body Armor (23)
Books (3)
Border War (17)
Brady Campaign (1)
Britain (38)
British Army (35)
Camping (4)
Canada (16)
Castle Doctrine (1)
Caucasus (6)
CENTCOM (7)
Center For a New American Security (8)
Charity (3)
China (16)
Christmas (13)
CIA (30)
Civilian National Security Force (3)
Col. Gian Gentile (9)
Combat Outposts (3)
Combat Video (2)
Concerned Citizens (6)
Constabulary Actions (3)
Coolness Factor (3)
COP Keating (4)
Corruption in COIN (4)
Council on Foreign Relations (1)
Counterinsurgency (218)
DADT (2)
David Rohde (1)
Defense Contractors (2)
Department of Defense (201)
Department of Homeland Security (26)
Disaster Preparedness (5)
Distributed Operations (5)
Dogs (12)
Donald Trump (27)
Drone Campaign (4)
EFV (3)
Egypt (12)
El Salvador (1)
Embassy Security (1)
Enemy Spotters (1)
Expeditionary Warfare (17)
F-22 (2)
F-35 (1)
Fallujah (17)
Far East (3)
Fathers and Sons (2)
Favorite (1)
Fazlullah (3)
FBI (35)
Featured (188)
Federal Firearms Laws (18)
Financing the Taliban (2)
Firearms (1,628)
Football (1)
Force Projection (35)
Force Protection (4)
Force Transformation (1)
Foreign Policy (27)
Fukushima Reactor Accident (6)
Ganjgal (1)
Garmsir (1)
general (15)
General Amos (1)
General James Mattis (1)
General McChrystal (44)
General McKiernan (6)
General Rodriguez (3)
General Suleimani (9)
Georgia (19)
GITMO (2)
Google (1)
Gulbuddin Hekmatyar (1)
Gun Control (1,483)
Guns (2,142)
Guns In National Parks (3)
Haditha Roundup (10)
Haiti (2)
HAMAS (7)
Haqqani Network (9)
Hate Mail (8)
Hekmatyar (1)
Heroism (4)
Hezbollah (12)
High Capacity Magazines (16)
High Value Targets (9)
Homecoming (1)
Homeland Security (3)
Horses (2)
Humor (67)
Hunting (10)
ICOS (1)
IEDs (7)
Immigration (98)
India (10)
Infantry (4)
Information Warfare (4)
Infrastructure (4)
Intelligence (23)
Intelligence Bulletin (6)
Iran (171)
Iraq (379)
Iraq SOFA (23)
Islamic Facism (64)
Islamists (97)
Israel (19)
Jaish al Mahdi (21)
Jalalabad (1)
Japan (3)
Jihadists (81)
John Nagl (5)
Joint Intelligence Centers (1)
JRTN (1)
Kabul (1)
Kajaki Dam (1)
Kamdesh (9)
Kandahar (12)
Karachi (7)
Kashmir (2)
Khost Province (1)
Khyber (11)
Knife Blogging (5)
Korea (4)
Korengal Valley (3)
Kunar Province (20)
Kurdistan (3)
Language in COIN (5)
Language in Statecraft (1)
Language Interpreters (2)
Lashkar-e-Taiba (2)
Law Enforcement (6)
Lawfare (13)
Leadership (6)
Lebanon (6)
Leon Panetta (2)
Let Them Fight (2)
Libya (14)
Lines of Effort (3)
Littoral Combat (8)
Logistics (50)
Long Guns (1)
Lt. Col. Allen West (2)
Marine Corps (273)
Marines in Bakwa (1)
Marines in Helmand (67)
Marjah (4)
MEDEVAC (2)
Media (62)
Medical (144)
Memorial Day (6)
Mexican Cartels (39)
Mexico (58)
Michael Yon (6)
Micromanaging the Military (7)
Middle East (1)
Military Blogging (26)
Military Contractors (5)
Military Equipment (25)
Militia (8)
Mitt Romney (3)
Monetary Policy (1)
Moqtada al Sadr (2)
Mosul (4)
Mountains (25)
MRAPs (1)
Mullah Baradar (1)
Mullah Fazlullah (1)
Mullah Omar (3)
Musa Qala (4)
Music (25)
Muslim Brotherhood (6)
Nation Building (2)
National Internet IDs (1)
National Rifle Association (88)
NATO (15)
Navy (29)
Navy Corpsman (1)
NCOs (3)
News (1)
NGOs (3)
Nicholas Schmidle (2)
Now Zad (19)
NSA (3)
NSA James L. Jones (6)
Nuclear (62)
Nuristan (8)
Obama Administration (221)
Offshore Balancing (1)
Operation Alljah (7)
Operation Khanjar (14)
Ossetia (7)
Pakistan (165)
Paktya Province (1)
Palestine (5)
Patriotism (7)
Patrolling (1)
Pech River Valley (11)
Personal (70)
Petraeus (14)
Pictures (1)
Piracy (13)
Pistol (3)
Pizzagate (21)
Police (590)
Police in COIN (3)
Policy (15)
Politics (960)
Poppy (2)
PPEs (1)
Prisons in Counterinsurgency (12)
Project Gunrunner (20)
PRTs (1)
Qatar (1)
Quadrennial Defense Review (2)
Quds Force (13)
Quetta Shura (1)
RAND (3)
Recommended Reading (14)
Refueling Tanker (1)
Religion (413)
Religion and Insurgency (19)
Reuters (1)
Rick Perry (4)
Rifles (1)
Roads (4)
Rolling Stone (1)
Ron Paul (1)
ROTC (1)
Rules of Engagement (75)
Rumsfeld (1)
Russia (37)
Sabbatical (1)
Sangin (1)
Saqlawiyah (1)
Satellite Patrols (2)
Saudi Arabia (4)
Scenes from Iraq (1)
Second Amendment (514)
Second Amendment Quick Hits (2)
Secretary Gates (9)
Sharia Law (3)
Shura Ittehad-ul-Mujahiden (1)
SIIC (2)
Sirajuddin Haqqani (1)
Small Wars (72)
Snipers (9)
Sniveling Lackeys (2)
Soft Power (4)
Somalia (8)
Sons of Afghanistan (1)
Sons of Iraq (2)
Special Forces (28)
Squad Rushes (1)
State Department (23)
Statistics (1)
Sunni Insurgency (10)
Support to Infantry Ratio (1)
Supreme Court (34)
Survival (151)
SWAT Raids (57)
Syria (38)
Tactical Drills (8)
Tactical Gear (7)
Taliban (168)
Taliban Massing of Forces (4)
Tarmiyah (1)
TBI (1)
Technology (21)
Tehrik-i-Taliban (78)
Terrain in Combat (1)
Terrorism (95)
Thanksgiving (12)
The Anbar Narrative (23)
The Art of War (5)
The Fallen (1)
The Long War (20)
The Surge (3)
The Wounded (13)
Thomas Barnett (1)
Transnational Insurgencies (5)
Tribes (5)
TSA (24)
TSA Ineptitude (13)
TTPs (4)
U.S. Border Patrol (5)
U.S. Border Security (17)
U.S. Sovereignty (21)
UAVs (2)
UBL (4)
Ukraine (10)
Uncategorized (78)
Universal Background Check (3)
Unrestricted Warfare (4)
USS Iwo Jima (2)
USS San Antonio (1)
Uzbekistan (1)
V-22 Osprey (4)
Veterans (3)
Vietnam (1)
War & Warfare (408)
War & Warfare (40)
War Movies (4)
War Reporting (21)
Wardak Province (1)
Warriors (6)
Waziristan (1)
Weapons and Tactics (76)
West Point (1)
Winter Operations (1)
Women in Combat (21)
WTF? (1)
Yemen (1)

December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006

about · archives · contact · register

Copyright © 2006-2022 Captain's Journal. All rights reserved.