The Militia Connection To The Second Amendment

BY Herschel Smith
2 weeks, 5 days ago

It’s entitled How Alexander Hamilton Solved America’s Gun Problem – 228 Years Ago.  I’ll only paste his conclusion.  You can read the rest for yourself.

The result of compulsory militia membership for gun owners is actual reform whose design originates directly from the framers of the Constitution. This reform adds oversight, training, and state regulation while keeping the federal government out (militias existing specifically as a check on federal power); preserving the right to keep firearms; contributing perhaps to the security of the United States in some presently unimaginable future conflict at home that involves enemy divisions and open warfare; and has a better chance of seeing law than does confiscation or a repeal of the right to bear arms.

There is the gist of it.  As I said, read the rest for the full argument.

But the argument fails the test of history and suffers from the obvious attempt to make a case where there is there none.  Remember that we’ve discussed this before, but just to rehearse, firearms ownership and use was ubiquitous in the colonies.

In the colonies, availability of hunting and need for defense led to armament statues comparable to those of the early Saxon times. In 1623, Virginia forbade its colonists to travel unless they were “well armed”; in 1631 it required colonists to engage in target practice on Sunday and to “bring their peeces to church.” In 1658 it required every householder to have a functioning firearm within his house and in 1673 its laws provided that a citizen who claimed he was too poor to purchase a firearm would have one purchased for him by the government, which would then require him to pay a reasonable price when able to do so. In Massachusetts, the first session of the legislature ordered that not only freemen, but also indentured servants own firearms and in 1644 it imposed a stern 6 shilling fine upon any citizen who was not armed.

When the British government began to increase its military presence in the colonies in the mid-eighteenth century, Massachusetts responded by calling upon its citizens to arm themselves in defense. One colonial newspaper argued that it was impossible to complain that this act was illegal since they were “British subjects, to whom the privilege of possessing arms is expressly recognized by the Bill of Rights” while another argued that this “is a natural right which the people have reserved to themselves, confirmed by the Bill of Rights, to keep arms for their own defense”. The newspaper cited Blackstone’s commentaries on the laws of England, which had listed the “having and using arms for self preservation and defense” among the “absolute rights of individuals.” The colonists felt they had an absolute right at common law to own firearms.

The notion that the rights to firearms ownership was granted by any government would have been considered ridiculous and dismissed in colonial times.  God grants rights – the state merely recognizes them, and if it doesn’t, the people have a right and duty under God to take action to ensure that the right is recognized.  There is so much more.

“1. John Adams John Adams, as a 9-or-10-year-old schoolboy, carried a gun daily so that he could go hunting after class. 3 DIARY AND AUTOBIOGRAPHY OF JOHN ADAMS 257-59 (1961). 2. Patrick Henry Patrick Henry would “walk to court, his musket slung over his shoulder to pick off small game.” Harlow Giles Unger, LION OF LIBERTY: PATRICK HENRY AND THE CALL TO A NEW NATION 30 (2010). 3. Daniel Boone “When Daniel was almost thirteen he was given his first firearm, a ‘short rifle gun, with which he roamed the nearby Flying Hills, the Oley Hills, and the Neversink Mountains.’ ” Robert Morgan, BOONE 14 (2007). 4. Meriwether Lewis Meriwether Lewis’s neighbor Thomas Jefferson observed that young Lewis “when only eight years of age . . . habitually went out, in the dead of night, alone with his dogs, into the forest to hunt the raccoon & opossum.” 8 WRITINGS OF THOMAS JEFFERSON, at 482.  5. Thomas Jefferson Thomas Jefferson himself carried as a lad. “When he was ten he was given a gun by his father and sent into the forest alone in order to develop self-reliance.” 1 Dumas Malone, JEFFERSON AND HIS TIME: JEFFERSON THE VIRGINIAN 46 (1948). As an adult, Jefferson wrote about a holster he made for one of his Turkish pistols, “having used it daily while I had a horse who would stand fire,” and he noted another holster he made “to hang them [the Turkish pistols] at the side of my carriage for road use.” 10 THE PAPERS OF THOMAS JEFFERSON, RETIREMENT SERIES 320-21 (2004). Jefferson advised his fifteen-yearold nephew to “[l]et your gun therefore be the constant companion of your walks.” 8 THE PAPERS OF THOMAS JEFFERSON 407 (2004). 6. James Monroe Every day, “[w]ell before dawn, James left for school, carrying his books under one arm with his powder horn under the other and his musket slung across his back.” Tim McGrath, JAMES MONROE: A LIFE 9 (2020). 7. Ira and Ethan Allen Ira and Ethan Allen regularly carried multiple arms at once. For example, in 1772 Ira, Ethan, and a cousin went to purchase land near New York’s border “armed with holsters and pistols, a good case [pair] of pistols each in our pockets, with each a good hanger [sword].”

We could continue but won’t for the sake of brevity.  The point is that firearms ownership is the presupposition to understanding the constitution, not the outcome, product or pronouncement.

The men who wrote it had just gotten finished with a war against their former king, using firearms they personally owned, and so the idea that they wouldn’t have understood the God-given right to oppose tyranny is absurd.  Moreover, their real concern within the context of the covenant they were producing in the constitution was that their newly formed federal government would become just like king George.

In order to prevent that possibility, they recognized the right of the states to be free of intervention by the federal government within the context of their men and armaments.  They only needed one reason to write those protections into the constitution, and this was it.  To them, it was the most important.

The constitution was not and is not a treatise on the entirety of the history of mankind and his rights.  It is a covenant between the states and the federal government, and between government and the people.

The author at The Week, David Brown, is correct to highlight the noted militia clause in the second amendment.  I wish more people would become aware of their history and heritage.  The militia needs to exist today, and for the very same reasons it did in the 1700s.

But David’s presuppositions led him astray.  He believes that a different rendering of the second amendment changes the well-documented, well-rehearsed, and well-established history upon which America was built.  So in conclusion, let’s pose two questions David could have asked, and give the correct answers to those questions.

First, “Is it important for men to own firearms to be able to answer the call to oppose tyranny, or in other words, does the militia have a valid role in today’s society?”  We may answer, yes, and in the superlative in today’s society.

Second, “Should compulsory militia membership be required as a precondition for firearms ownership?”  To which we may answer, the mere asking of the question betrays a fundamental misunderstanding of the source of our rights, the history of colonial America, God’s expectations for us, and the reasons for the Bill of Rights.

The question isn’t just answered with a ‘no’, it is completely irrelevant and immaterial.  It has nothing whatsoever to do with rights granted by the Almighty, or for that matter, the second amendment.


Comments

  1. On September 8, 2021 at 9:35 pm, Ohio Guy said:

    Too much mental illness in and out of positions of power. They’re gonna need killin’! There! I said it.

  2. On September 8, 2021 at 11:06 pm, Dave Moore said:

    10USC246 DEFINES the US militia as all able bodied male citizens between the ages of 17 and 45. (Plus some others, including women in the National Guard.)That’s the definition, not the enlistment criteria.

    Seventeen is, roughly, high school juniors.

    Question for school boards: Are you preparing our young men to exercise the rights and duties of militia membership before they’ve graduated high school?

    No? You’re actually fighting against requiring teachers and administrators within that age range to carry concealed to protect their students and as examples of good citizenship?

    You’re fired.
    ===

    Side note: You’d like to take out your frustrations on society by shooting up the local high school. You find there’s a portable sign out front congratulating the rifle team on winning the state championship. Every pickup truck in the parking lot has a rifle rack in the window. Is this where you’ll make your Grand Gesture?

  3. On September 9, 2021 at 6:20 am, Mike Austin said:

    I would make US citizenship dependent upon the ownership of a pistol and a rifle.

  4. On September 9, 2021 at 11:11 am, Factions Speak Louder Than Herds said:

    Every able bodied male is the Militia.
    The 2A was made for this time because the Founder Fathers were some of the most brilliant men ever to live.
    Is that offensive to the woke herd hive? Who the F’ cares about the feelings of those born to be wards of the state.

    I prefer dangerous freedom over peaceful slavery. Thomas Jefferson

  5. On September 9, 2021 at 12:19 pm, Fred said:

    I would make US citizenship dependant on “…us and our posterity.”

  6. On September 9, 2021 at 1:44 pm, scott s. said:

    Many states have constitutional provisions similar to the 2A. I would like the author to explain what he considers is the object of these state provisions.

  7. On September 9, 2021 at 2:44 pm, Paul B said:

    It would be fun to have target practice at the church.

  8. On September 9, 2021 at 4:42 pm, Mack said:

    See what the VA Attorney General has to say:

    https://www.oag.state.va.us/media-center/news-releases/2142-september-3-2021-herring-defends-longstanding-federal-gun-violence-prevention-measure

  9. On September 9, 2021 at 9:00 pm, Bill Buppert said:

    On 19 and 20 April 1775 when the hills were alive with swarms of militia, every one of those men were violating English law in a contest with British Regulars and in that moment were ALL Englishmen as Paul Revere and William Dawes were British in the saddle as they sounded the alarm that the regulars were out.

    No government permits secession and divorce, it sends the wrong message.

    All of this talk of the legal niceties of militias and rebellion have no relevance whatsoever to the inevitable act[s] of secession that visit every empire in Earth’s history.

    Rebellion is not a video game nor a legal exercise.

  10. On September 10, 2021 at 12:39 pm, Tionico said:

    in response to Bill Buppert your claim that the “rebellion” of 19 April was wrongly pressed is a false claim.

    Don’t forget, every one of the thirteen colo ies in existance at that tim had taken out charters from the reigning king at the time the charters were drafted and ratified. Every one of those charters had provisioins relating to the conduct of both the colon in question, and the government of England specificaly the King who signed that charter.

    By 1775 the Britihs Crown had violated nearly every term of every charter. They had ordered closure of legislative bodies, taxed way out of line, enacted numberous burdensome laws, drafted men into the British army to fight verious wars, preventd public meetings (in Massachussetts they got round that one by simply adjourning, rather than closing, any time of gathering, able to resume at will at some later date). Meetings were outlawed, quartering of troops in the homes was a signficant insult, military personnel went about as thugs do today, going wherever and taking whatever they wished. The final straw, the one upon which the people of Massachussetts could NOT swallow, was when the king, in December 1774, sent a direct order to his head stooge GeneralThomas GAge to “disarm those rebellious subjects”. He’d tried three times before, none of which succeeded in removing and keeping arms that were seized. Lexington/COncord was simply his ofurth powder raid, but his secret was leaked, Dr. Jseph Warren informed Paul Revere and Billy Dawes, they rode out into the night and spread the alarum. vernight, some 14,000 armed trained militia took to the field to oppose the military action.

    The king had VIOLATED nearly every term of the Charters he and/or his predecessors had agreed to as each of the thirteen colonies was formed.

    So I ask you, Sir, respectfully:
    Exactly WHO was in rebellion?
    I assert that had Gage not launched his atteck, the shooting would not have begun.. and it is fact that it was his Regulars that opened fire agaisnt the men of Captain Parker putting eight of them into their graves that day. Their crime? Standing to protect their personal property that Gage had sent Col Smith to seize, illegally, from them. Parker had given orders do not fire unless fired upon” That order was repeated hroughout the morning as Gage’s men under Smith engaged in further conflicts, opening fire upon C
    olonials who were simply there, making no direct threat to anyone, only standing their ground.

    Go and LEARN the history of this period of time. Your coments reveal yo are ignorant of it. Educate yourself and avoid proving yourself the fool by such drivel as posted above.

  11. On September 10, 2021 at 1:32 pm, Bill Buppert said:

    If your ad hominem attack assumes me to be sympathetic to the Crown in the American colonies, you are mistaken.

    It was only a matter of time, remember, Gage started trying to sieze powder and arms in September 1774 and failed. The three strikes of the match during Lexington and Concord that set the colonies and crown on collision were inevitable.

    And every one of those charters was administered by a Royal Governor of EACH of the thirteen colonies chartered by the King in England until the divorce proceedings were signed in blood on 19 April 1775. I stand by my notion that Paul Revere and his confreres were Englishmen in the saddle and on foot until that following morning on Lexington Green.

    Tionico: “Go and LEARN the history of this period of time. Your coments reveal yo are ignorant of it. Educate yourself and avoid proving yourself the fool by such drivel as posted above.”

    I would suggest you do the same and start with Fred Anderson’s magisterial “Crucible of War: The Seven Years’ War and the Fate of Empire in British North America, 1754-1766”. And I have other recommendations for reading in the period if you wish despite my “drivel”.

    You talk about taxes and regulations, you mean these:

    “Many causes emerged and these are certainly at the forefront:

    October 7, 1763 King George III proclaims a ban on westward migration in the colonies.

    April 5 and 9, 1763 Parliament passes the Sugar and Currency Acts

    March 22, 1765 Parliament passes the Stamp Act (even playing cards and dice)

    May 15, 1765 Parliament passes the Quartering Act of 1765

    March 18, 1766 Parliament repeals the Stamp Act and passes the Declaratory Act (asserting the authority of Parliament to legislate for the colonies “in all cases whatsoever.”)

    June 29, 1766 Parliament passes the Townshend Acts

    July, 1767 Parliament passes the New York Suspending Act

    April 21, 1768 The British Secretary of State for the colonies responds to the Massachusetts Circular Letter

    June 8, 1769 The British Secretary of State for the colonies orders General Thomas Gage to deploy forces to Boston

    March 5, 1770 The Boston Massacre leads to the death of five colonists

    November 2, 1772 The first Committee of Correspondence is formed in Boston, and produces Samuel Adams’ bold assertion of the “Rights of the Colonists,” and Dr. Joseph Warren’s “List of Infringements and Violations of Rights.”

    January 6, 1773 Massachusetts’ Governor Hutchinson argues the supremacy of Parliament before the General Court

    May 10, 1773 With the passage of the Tea Act, the East India Company is granted a virtual monopoly on the tea trade in the colonies

    March 31-June 2, 1774 The British Parliament passes the five Coercive Acts in order to punish Massachusetts for the Tea Party and regain control of the colony

    September 11, 1774 King George III commits Britain to a policy of intractable opposition to colonial claims.

    This is not the complete list but simply highlights what one can find in the primary source documents but many of these simply overlook the day to day predations of the ruling class both English and later American weaponized by the governing instruments of the state.The Whiskey Rebellion was merely a homegrown version of reacting to the Coercive Acts under the British yoke. I would urge everyone interested to read further on these precursors to American Revolution I.”

    That’s an extract from my blog post, you find the rest here: https://zerogov.com/2015/05/02/the-first-ten-years-the-monster-proceeds-apace-by-bill-buppert/

    Apparently not all of us have the historiographer’s command you boast about but there is it.

    Cordially,

    Bill Buppert

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment


You are currently reading "The Militia Connection To The Second Amendment", entry #28107 on The Captain's Journal.

This article is filed under the category(s) Second Amendment and was published September 8th, 2021 by Herschel Smith.

If you're interested in what else the The Captain's Journal has to say, you might try thumbing through the archives and visiting the main index, or; perhaps you would like to learn more about TCJ.

26th MEU (10)
Abu Muqawama (12)
ACOG (2)
ACOGs (1)
Afghan National Army (36)
Afghan National Police (17)
Afghanistan (703)
Afghanistan SOFA (4)
Agriculture in COIN (3)
AGW (1)
Air Force (36)
Air Power (9)
al Qaeda (83)
Ali al-Sistani (1)
America (21)
Ammunition (163)
Animals (113)
Ansar al Sunna (15)
Anthropology (3)
Antonin Scalia (1)
AR-15s (291)
Arghandab River Valley (1)
Arlington Cemetery (2)
Army (79)
Assassinations (2)
Assault Weapon Ban (27)
Australian Army (7)
Azerbaijan (4)
Backpacking (2)
Badr Organization (8)
Baitullah Mehsud (21)
Basra (17)
BATFE (120)
Battle of Bari Alai (2)
Battle of Wanat (18)
Battle Space Weight (3)
Bin Laden (7)
Blogroll (3)
Blogs (23)
Body Armor (20)
Books (3)
Border War (12)
Brady Campaign (1)
Britain (38)
British Army (35)
Camping (4)
Canada (3)
Castle Doctrine (1)
Caucasus (6)
CENTCOM (7)
Center For a New American Security (8)
Charity (3)
China (15)
Christmas (12)
CIA (28)
Civilian National Security Force (3)
Col. Gian Gentile (9)
Combat Outposts (3)
Combat Video (2)
Concerned Citizens (6)
Constabulary Actions (3)
Coolness Factor (3)
COP Keating (4)
Corruption in COIN (4)
Council on Foreign Relations (1)
Counterinsurgency (217)
DADT (2)
David Rohde (1)
Defense Contractors (2)
Department of Defense (186)
Department of Homeland Security (26)
Disaster Preparedness (4)
Distributed Operations (5)
Dogs (12)
Donald Trump (26)
Drone Campaign (3)
EFV (3)
Egypt (12)
El Salvador (1)
Embassy Security (1)
Enemy Spotters (1)
Expeditionary Warfare (17)
F-22 (2)
F-35 (1)
Fallujah (17)
Far East (3)
Fathers and Sons (2)
Favorite (1)
Fazlullah (3)
FBI (32)
Featured (186)
Federal Firearms Laws (18)
Financing the Taliban (2)
Firearms (1,401)
Football (1)
Force Projection (35)
Force Protection (4)
Force Transformation (1)
Foreign Policy (27)
Fukushima Reactor Accident (6)
Ganjgal (1)
Garmsir (1)
general (15)
General Amos (1)
General James Mattis (1)
General McChrystal (44)
General McKiernan (6)
General Rodriguez (3)
General Suleimani (9)
Georgia (19)
GITMO (2)
Google (1)
Gulbuddin Hekmatyar (1)
Gun Control (1,377)
Guns (1,903)
Guns In National Parks (3)
Haditha Roundup (10)
Haiti (2)
HAMAS (7)
Haqqani Network (9)
Hate Mail (8)
Hekmatyar (1)
Heroism (4)
Hezbollah (12)
High Capacity Magazines (16)
High Value Targets (9)
Homecoming (1)
Homeland Security (1)
Horses (1)
Humor (37)
ICOS (1)
IEDs (7)
Immigration (94)
India (10)
Infantry (4)
Information Warfare (2)
Infrastructure (2)
Intelligence (23)
Intelligence Bulletin (6)
Iran (170)
Iraq (379)
Iraq SOFA (23)
Islamic Facism (64)
Islamists (95)
Israel (18)
Jaish al Mahdi (21)
Jalalabad (1)
Japan (2)
Jihadists (80)
John Nagl (5)
Joint Intelligence Centers (1)
JRTN (1)
Kabul (1)
Kajaki Dam (1)
Kamdesh (9)
Kandahar (12)
Karachi (7)
Kashmir (2)
Khost Province (1)
Khyber (11)
Knife Blogging (4)
Korea (4)
Korengal Valley (3)
Kunar Province (20)
Kurdistan (3)
Language in COIN (5)
Language in Statecraft (1)
Language Interpreters (2)
Lashkar-e-Taiba (2)
Law Enforcement (4)
Lawfare (7)
Leadership (6)
Lebanon (6)
Leon Panetta (2)
Let Them Fight (2)
Libya (14)
Lines of Effort (3)
Littoral Combat (8)
Logistics (50)
Long Guns (1)
Lt. Col. Allen West (2)
Marine Corps (270)
Marines in Bakwa (1)
Marines in Helmand (67)
Marjah (4)
MEDEVAC (2)
Media (61)
Medical (79)
Memorial Day (6)
Mexican Cartels (35)
Mexico (51)
Michael Yon (6)
Micromanaging the Military (7)
Middle East (1)
Military Blogging (26)
Military Contractors (4)
Military Equipment (24)
Militia (5)
Mitt Romney (3)
Monetary Policy (1)
Moqtada al Sadr (2)
Mosul (4)
Mountains (25)
MRAPs (1)
Mullah Baradar (1)
Mullah Fazlullah (1)
Mullah Omar (3)
Musa Qala (4)
Music (23)
Muslim Brotherhood (6)
Nation Building (2)
National Internet IDs (1)
National Rifle Association (73)
NATO (15)
Navy (24)
Navy Corpsman (1)
NCOs (3)
News (1)
NGOs (2)
Nicholas Schmidle (2)
Now Zad (19)
NSA (3)
NSA James L. Jones (6)
Nuclear (58)
Nuristan (8)
Obama Administration (221)
Offshore Balancing (1)
Operation Alljah (7)
Operation Khanjar (14)
Ossetia (7)
Pakistan (165)
Paktya Province (1)
Palestine (5)
Patriotism (7)
Patrolling (1)
Pech River Valley (11)
Personal (66)
Petraeus (14)
Pictures (1)
Piracy (13)
Pistol (2)
Pizzagate (21)
Police (541)
Police in COIN (3)
Policy (15)
Politics (890)
Poppy (2)
PPEs (1)
Prisons in Counterinsurgency (12)
Project Gunrunner (20)
PRTs (1)
Qatar (1)
Quadrennial Defense Review (2)
Quds Force (13)
Quetta Shura (1)
RAND (3)
Recommended Reading (14)
Refueling Tanker (1)
Religion (243)
Religion and Insurgency (19)
Reuters (1)
Rick Perry (4)
Rifles (1)
Roads (4)
Rolling Stone (1)
Ron Paul (1)
ROTC (1)
Rules of Engagement (75)
Rumsfeld (1)
Russia (32)
Sabbatical (1)
Sangin (1)
Saqlawiyah (1)
Satellite Patrols (2)
Saudi Arabia (4)
Scenes from Iraq (1)
Second Amendment (431)
Second Amendment Quick Hits (2)
Secretary Gates (9)
Sharia Law (3)
Shura Ittehad-ul-Mujahiden (1)
SIIC (2)
Sirajuddin Haqqani (1)
Small Wars (72)
Snipers (9)
Sniveling Lackeys (2)
Soft Power (4)
Somalia (8)
Sons of Afghanistan (1)
Sons of Iraq (2)
Special Forces (28)
Squad Rushes (1)
State Department (22)
Statistics (1)
Sunni Insurgency (10)
Support to Infantry Ratio (1)
Supreme Court (30)
Survival (53)
SWAT Raids (55)
Syria (38)
Tactical Drills (2)
Tactical Gear (6)
Taliban (168)
Taliban Massing of Forces (4)
Tarmiyah (1)
TBI (1)
Technology (17)
Tehrik-i-Taliban (78)
Terrain in Combat (1)
Terrorism (95)
Thanksgiving (10)
The Anbar Narrative (23)
The Art of War (5)
The Fallen (1)
The Long War (20)
The Surge (3)
The Wounded (13)
Thomas Barnett (1)
Transnational Insurgencies (5)
Tribes (5)
TSA (22)
TSA Ineptitude (13)
TTPs (4)
U.S. Border Patrol (5)
U.S. Border Security (14)
U.S. Sovereignty (17)
UAVs (2)
UBL (4)
Ukraine (3)
Uncategorized (58)
Universal Background Check (3)
Unrestricted Warfare (4)
USS Iwo Jima (2)
USS San Antonio (1)
Uzbekistan (1)
V-22 Osprey (4)
Veterans (3)
Vietnam (1)
War & Warfare (316)
War & Warfare (40)
War Movies (4)
War Reporting (21)
Wardak Province (1)
Warriors (6)
Waziristan (1)
Weapons and Tactics (73)
West Point (1)
Winter Operations (1)
Women in Combat (21)
WTF? (1)
Yemen (1)

September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006

about · archives · contact · register

Copyright © 2006-2021 Captain's Journal. All rights reserved.