ATF Proposes New Rules On ‘Green Tip’ Ammunition Ban

BY Herschel Smith
9 years, 1 month ago

David Codrea:

The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives posted a proposed rule change Friday removing a previous exemption and banning the manufacture, import and sale of “5.56 mm (.223) SS109 and M855 ‘green tip’ ammunition containing a steel core,” saying it now considers it to be “non-sporting” handgun ammunition capable of penetrating protective vests worn by law enforcement officers. This latest development, ceding to law enforcement lobby interests, is prompted by the development of handguns capable of firing the cited ammunition.

[ … ]

“This ‘sporting use’ strategy was used before,” author and attorney Richard Stevens documented. “The Nazi Weapons Law (18 March 1938) forbade importation of weapons under substantially the same test.” Additionally, the intent of founders in drafting the Second Amendment makes no such exception to allow “sporting purpose” infringements, particularly by the federal government.

Read all of David’s well-sourced article.  Steel tip (aka “green tip”) ammunition is designed a little heavier for slightly different flight and terminal ballistics and better penetration at long distances.  There are a host of reasons someone might want to have this ammunition, not all of which have to do with so-called sporting purposes according to the ATF.  Then again, my definition of sporting purposes and the ATF’s definition of sporting purposes differ by a wide margin.

The Sporting Purposes test should be found unconstitutional since the second amendment pertains to the amelioration of tyranny rather than hunting.  The ATF has crafted a regulatory framework that contradicts and violates the intent of the founding fathers.  Therefore, everyone who works for the ATF is undermining the constitution.

On a personal note, I would like to thank Eric Holder for reminding me that it’s important to keep track of the good bargains in my area of operations.

M855

450 rounds of M855 “green tip,” 30 cents per round – ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

As for Holder and the lawyers at ATF who have crafted such statist regulations, and the Golgothan for whom they all work, you will see your maker soon enough and then answer for your sins.

Trackbacks & Pingbacks


Comments

  1. On February 16, 2015 at 1:48 pm, BuckRedstone said:

    What is the probability at this point in time BATFE’s latest abomination will stand in this new CONgress? 50/50; 60/40; 70/30?

  2. On February 16, 2015 at 1:59 pm, Herschel Smith said:

    Sad to say – 100%. Congress could attach a repeal to something the evil one in the White House really wanted, like a new spending bill, in order to get him to sign it, but they don’t have the guts. And there are too many pet attachments other congress-critters will want to make in order to get re-elected. No one will champion a repeal of “green tip” ammunition ban. They don’t even know what that is, much less care enough to push it. And if they don’t know, it’s likely their constituency doesn’t either.

  3. On February 16, 2015 at 3:57 pm, Pat Hines said:

    This is a proposed rule making under current authority claimed by the BATFE, they don’t need congress to make this the law.

  4. On February 16, 2015 at 2:31 pm, DNH said:

    The way the law (18 U.S.C. 921(a)(17)(B) ) is written, “capable” has nothing do with what is or is not considered to be “armor piercing ammunition”, all that matters is what the bullet is made of, not how it performs.

    It is not clear that SS109/M855 actual matches the definition given in 8 U.S.C. 921(a)(17)(B) under (i) or (ii), as the core is mostly lead, and supposedly the jacket is less than 25% of total projectile weight.

    If the bullet doesn’t meet the definition, then this law does not apply and BATFE cannot stop sales, even if the ammo is commonly used in handguns.

  5. On February 16, 2015 at 2:41 pm, Herschel Smith said:

    I assume that technically you are correct. But we’ve seen the ATF make decisions in the past – and enforce it with arrests, fines, etc. – that have no support in the law.

  6. On February 17, 2015 at 10:40 am, Ned Weatherby said:

    Actually, M885 was specifically exempted as AP by ATF some years ago. They are posting their intent to reclassify it as AP.

    “If the bullet doesn’t meet the definition, then this law does not apply
    and BATFE cannot stop sales, even if the ammo is commonly used in
    handguns.”

    The problem here is you’re trying to use logic in re the U.S. Code and BATFU regulations and rulemaking processes. The unfortunate fact is, they’ll do whatever they please, comments regarding their proposed rulemaking changes or not. It’s about limiting ammo supply – not the lethality of the bullet tips. You can read all sorts of data on why the USMC adopted the MK 318, or the new M855A1 EPR, (which “upgrades” M855 ammo, partially by increasing chamber pressure from 55,000 psi to over 60,000 psi) and look at the original design parameters of the M855 and what it can and cannot do.

    This might be good fodder for commenting to BATFU, but IMO, the proposed rulemaking change is designed to eliminate surplus ammo from the civilian market. Bullet design has next to nothing to do with this. They will claim it has a scary “steel penetrator” while almost any standard centerfire rifle cartridge will shoot through most soft armor – typically SAPI plates are used to protect against centerfilre rifle.

  7. On February 16, 2015 at 3:56 pm, Pat Hines said:

    The panic is already in progress, with this ammo threat causing the shelves to begin to be cleaned out. So far, the only proposed restriction is on the Green tip, but my view is the BATFE will not stop here, they will continue to find more and more rifle ammo, that can be fired in a pistol, to be armor piercing. There are pistols chambered for 7.62×51, so even that is not safe from this criminal agency.

    This may generate a general panic that restarts the shortages of a couple of years ago.

  8. On February 16, 2015 at 5:22 pm, DNH said:

    BATFE doesn’t get to write new laws, they just get to interpret existing laws. So they cannot “continue to find more and more rifle ammo, that can be fired in a pistol, to be armor piercing.“– unless the ammo meets the specific materials and construction criteria given in 18 U.S.C. 921(a)(17)(B), it doesn’t matter, even if the round is more effective than M855 at actually piercing ammo, BATFE can’t legally do anything about it.

    SS109 and M855 weren’t even that great, the best thing about this ammo was the price.

  9. On February 16, 2015 at 5:40 pm, Herschel Smith said:

    Well, yes, no and maybe. They cannot legally make new laws, but I work in an industry where federal regulators do that every day. They call it rulemaking, and even if they don’t go through the process to examine financial effects, etc., like they are supposed to concerning backfit rules, they will publish a proposed regulation to the federal register, wait for comments, summarily ignore comments, and then put it out as a new regulation. Congress rarely passes laws in such detail that things like this are considered. Unfortunately they leave it up to the executive branch, thus empowering that branch even more. We answer to an army of lawyers inside the beltway.

  10. On February 17, 2015 at 9:06 am, Ned Weatherby said:

    Exactly. See, for instance, the Internal Revenue Code: The secretary shall make regulations; The enforcement of these regulations are delegated too: etc.

    It’s congress writing page after page of laws, and allowing “regulations” and “rulemaking” to be delegated to the head of an agency, who then writes delegation orders delineating who will enforce said regulation. Congress has allowed, er, directed the Executive office to usurp its lawmaking powers.

  11. On February 16, 2015 at 10:59 pm, pjb1 said:

    Clearly, they CAN write new laws, because they ARE writing new laws. Do try to keep up with reality, and don’t get too wrapped up in the difference between writing and interpreting. It’s all bullshit. They do as they please, as long as they have an executive that goes along.

    Of course they are being naughty, but what else is new? It will keep going on like this until the war starts; then there won’t be any regulations at all.

  12. On February 17, 2015 at 10:42 am, Ned Weatherby said:

    Hadn’t had time to check, but this is exactly what I suspected. One wonders if ATK and other ammo manufacturers who use SS109 tops are commenting on this proposed rule with technical data.

  13. On February 16, 2015 at 5:56 pm, No Name Brand said:

    This is a lawsuit waiting to happen, I give it a week or so and someone will file a lawsuit against!

  14. On February 17, 2015 at 1:04 am, Pat Hines said:

    No, there won’t be any lawsuits because this is merely a proposed rule making, it’s not done yet. If the BATFE follows suit, then suits may be filed.

  15. On February 16, 2015 at 7:07 pm, Daniel K Day said:

    “you will see your maker soon enough and then answer for your sins”
    I must disagree with your final statement. It will not be “soon enough” for me.

  16. On February 17, 2015 at 8:47 am, Longbow said:

    “Therefore, everyone who works for the ATF is undermining the constitution.” Jeepers, no shit? But what about the average ATF street agent I keep hearing about? What about how he is only after REAL bad guys and doesn’t want to “infringe”, and how he is, deep down, a Constitutionalist also? And a gun owner? You think maybe he just doesn’t know that the agency he works for has an anti-Constitution and anti-liberty and anti-rights agenda? You think he works for this agency for an entire career and just doesn’t know?

  17. On February 17, 2015 at 3:35 pm, Yank lll said:

    IIRC this matter was already addressed at a time when the influence and standing of the out of control agency was much high than it is now.. it was specifically designated by them as non armor piercing if memory serves me.

  18. On February 17, 2015 at 9:13 pm, Right_2_Bear_Arms said:

    Just when 5.56 was getting cheaper and more available again. Man I’m tired of this shit.

  19. On February 18, 2015 at 10:31 am, Ned Weatherby said:

    Incidentally, this proposed rule isn’t published yet in the Federal Register, as far as I can tell.

  20. On February 23, 2015 at 9:35 pm, Bo Treat said:

    so called sporting purposes? since when do we have to justify owning anything based upon sporting events….american government isn’t about preventing crime, it’s about preventing the prevention of their control. communists…this isn’t china.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment


You are currently reading "ATF Proposes New Rules On ‘Green Tip’ Ammunition Ban", entry #13432 on The Captain's Journal.

This article is filed under the category(s) Ammunition,BATFE,Obama Administration and was published February 15th, 2015 by Herschel Smith.

If you're interested in what else the The Captain's Journal has to say, you might try thumbing through the archives and visiting the main index, or; perhaps you would like to learn more about TCJ.

26th MEU (10)
Abu Muqawama (12)
ACOG (2)
ACOGs (1)
Afghan National Army (36)
Afghan National Police (17)
Afghanistan (704)
Afghanistan SOFA (4)
Agriculture in COIN (3)
AGW (1)
Air Force (40)
Air Power (10)
al Qaeda (83)
Ali al-Sistani (1)
America (22)
Ammunition (275)
Animals (280)
Ansar al Sunna (15)
Anthropology (3)
Antonin Scalia (1)
AR-15s (372)
Arghandab River Valley (1)
Arlington Cemetery (2)
Army (86)
Assassinations (2)
Assault Weapon Ban (28)
Australian Army (7)
Azerbaijan (4)
Backpacking (2)
Badr Organization (8)
Baitullah Mehsud (21)
Basra (17)
BATFE (217)
Battle of Bari Alai (2)
Battle of Wanat (18)
Battle Space Weight (3)
Bin Laden (7)
Blogroll (3)
Blogs (24)
Body Armor (23)
Books (3)
Border War (18)
Brady Campaign (1)
Britain (38)
British Army (35)
Camping (5)
Canada (17)
Castle Doctrine (1)
Caucasus (6)
CENTCOM (7)
Center For a New American Security (8)
Charity (3)
China (16)
Christmas (16)
CIA (30)
Civilian National Security Force (3)
Col. Gian Gentile (9)
Combat Outposts (3)
Combat Video (2)
Concerned Citizens (6)
Constabulary Actions (3)
Coolness Factor (3)
COP Keating (4)
Corruption in COIN (4)
Council on Foreign Relations (1)
Counterinsurgency (218)
DADT (2)
David Rohde (1)
Defense Contractors (2)
Department of Defense (210)
Department of Homeland Security (26)
Disaster Preparedness (5)
Distributed Operations (5)
Dogs (15)
Donald Trump (27)
Drone Campaign (4)
EFV (3)
Egypt (12)
El Salvador (1)
Embassy Security (1)
Enemy Spotters (1)
Expeditionary Warfare (17)
F-22 (2)
F-35 (1)
Fallujah (17)
Far East (3)
Fathers and Sons (2)
Favorite (1)
Fazlullah (3)
FBI (39)
Featured (189)
Federal Firearms Laws (18)
Financing the Taliban (2)
Firearms (1,758)
Football (1)
Force Projection (35)
Force Protection (4)
Force Transformation (1)
Foreign Policy (27)
Fukushima Reactor Accident (6)
Ganjgal (1)
Garmsir (1)
general (15)
General Amos (1)
General James Mattis (1)
General McChrystal (44)
General McKiernan (6)
General Rodriguez (3)
General Suleimani (9)
Georgia (19)
GITMO (2)
Google (1)
Gulbuddin Hekmatyar (1)
Gun Control (1,630)
Guns (2,298)
Guns In National Parks (3)
Haditha Roundup (10)
Haiti (2)
HAMAS (7)
Haqqani Network (9)
Hate Mail (8)
Hekmatyar (1)
Heroism (4)
Hezbollah (12)
High Capacity Magazines (16)
High Value Targets (9)
Homecoming (1)
Homeland Security (3)
Horses (2)
Humor (72)
Hunting (31)
ICOS (1)
IEDs (7)
Immigration (104)
India (10)
Infantry (4)
Information Warfare (4)
Infrastructure (4)
Intelligence (23)
Intelligence Bulletin (6)
Iran (171)
Iraq (379)
Iraq SOFA (23)
Islamic Facism (64)
Islamists (98)
Israel (19)
Jaish al Mahdi (21)
Jalalabad (1)
Japan (3)
Jihadists (81)
John Nagl (5)
Joint Intelligence Centers (1)
JRTN (1)
Kabul (1)
Kajaki Dam (1)
Kamdesh (9)
Kandahar (12)
Karachi (7)
Kashmir (2)
Khost Province (1)
Khyber (11)
Knife Blogging (7)
Korea (4)
Korengal Valley (3)
Kunar Province (20)
Kurdistan (3)
Language in COIN (5)
Language in Statecraft (1)
Language Interpreters (2)
Lashkar-e-Taiba (2)
Law Enforcement (6)
Lawfare (14)
Leadership (6)
Lebanon (6)
Leon Panetta (2)
Let Them Fight (2)
Libya (14)
Lines of Effort (3)
Littoral Combat (8)
Logistics (50)
Long Guns (1)
Lt. Col. Allen West (2)
Marine Corps (280)
Marines in Bakwa (1)
Marines in Helmand (67)
Marjah (4)
MEDEVAC (2)
Media (67)
Medical (146)
Memorial Day (6)
Mexican Cartels (41)
Mexico (61)
Michael Yon (6)
Micromanaging the Military (7)
Middle East (1)
Military Blogging (26)
Military Contractors (5)
Military Equipment (25)
Militia (9)
Mitt Romney (3)
Monetary Policy (1)
Moqtada al Sadr (2)
Mosul (4)
Mountains (25)
MRAPs (1)
Mullah Baradar (1)
Mullah Fazlullah (1)
Mullah Omar (3)
Musa Qala (4)
Music (25)
Muslim Brotherhood (6)
Nation Building (2)
National Internet IDs (1)
National Rifle Association (95)
NATO (15)
Navy (30)
Navy Corpsman (1)
NCOs (3)
News (1)
NGOs (3)
Nicholas Schmidle (2)
Now Zad (19)
NSA (3)
NSA James L. Jones (6)
Nuclear (62)
Nuristan (8)
Obama Administration (221)
Offshore Balancing (1)
Operation Alljah (7)
Operation Khanjar (14)
Ossetia (7)
Pakistan (165)
Paktya Province (1)
Palestine (5)
Patriotism (7)
Patrolling (1)
Pech River Valley (11)
Personal (72)
Petraeus (14)
Pictures (1)
Piracy (13)
Pistol (4)
Pizzagate (21)
Police (647)
Police in COIN (3)
Policy (15)
Politics (969)
Poppy (2)
PPEs (1)
Prisons in Counterinsurgency (12)
Project Gunrunner (20)
PRTs (1)
Qatar (1)
Quadrennial Defense Review (2)
Quds Force (13)
Quetta Shura (1)
RAND (3)
Recommended Reading (14)
Refueling Tanker (1)
Religion (491)
Religion and Insurgency (19)
Reuters (1)
Rick Perry (4)
Rifles (1)
Roads (4)
Rolling Stone (1)
Ron Paul (1)
ROTC (1)
Rules of Engagement (75)
Rumsfeld (1)
Russia (37)
Sabbatical (1)
Sangin (1)
Saqlawiyah (1)
Satellite Patrols (2)
Saudi Arabia (4)
Scenes from Iraq (1)
Second Amendment (667)
Second Amendment Quick Hits (2)
Secretary Gates (9)
Sharia Law (3)
Shura Ittehad-ul-Mujahiden (1)
SIIC (2)
Sirajuddin Haqqani (1)
Small Wars (72)
Snipers (9)
Sniveling Lackeys (2)
Soft Power (4)
Somalia (8)
Sons of Afghanistan (1)
Sons of Iraq (2)
Special Forces (28)
Squad Rushes (1)
State Department (23)
Statistics (1)
Sunni Insurgency (10)
Support to Infantry Ratio (1)
Supreme Court (52)
Survival (185)
SWAT Raids (57)
Syria (38)
Tactical Drills (38)
Tactical Gear (14)
Taliban (168)
Taliban Massing of Forces (4)
Tarmiyah (1)
TBI (1)
Technology (21)
Tehrik-i-Taliban (78)
Terrain in Combat (1)
Terrorism (96)
Thanksgiving (13)
The Anbar Narrative (23)
The Art of War (5)
The Fallen (1)
The Long War (20)
The Surge (3)
The Wounded (13)
Thomas Barnett (1)
Transnational Insurgencies (5)
Tribes (5)
TSA (24)
TSA Ineptitude (13)
TTPs (4)
U.S. Border Patrol (6)
U.S. Border Security (18)
U.S. Sovereignty (23)
UAVs (2)
UBL (4)
Ukraine (10)
Uncategorized (98)
Universal Background Check (3)
Unrestricted Warfare (4)
USS Iwo Jima (2)
USS San Antonio (1)
Uzbekistan (1)
V-22 Osprey (4)
Veterans (3)
Vietnam (1)
War & Warfare (412)
War & Warfare (41)
War Movies (4)
War Reporting (21)
Wardak Province (1)
Warriors (6)
Waziristan (1)
Weapons and Tactics (79)
West Point (1)
Winter Operations (1)
Women in Combat (21)
WTF? (1)
Yemen (1)

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006

about · archives · contact · register

Copyright © 2006-2024 Captain's Journal. All rights reserved.