Ruger Facebook Response To Request That They Not Distribute To Dick’s Sporting Goods

BY Herschel Smith
10 months, 2 weeks ago

FB:

To All Our Loyal Fans & Customers: We have had a number of inquiries about whether we plan to discontinue sales to Dick’s Sporting Goods. We do not sell to Dick’s. Ruger utilizes a two-step distribution system in which we sell to independent, federally licensed distributors, who sell to independent, federally licensed retailers. Because the distributors are independent, we cannot control where they sell the products they acquire. However, we share your concerns about how Dick’s is conducting itself and are disappointed by their recent actions. Given Dick’s recent pronouncements, we expect it is safe to assume that you will not be seeing Ruger firearms in their stores. #Ruger #firearms

I just don’t know whether I believe this.  All Ruger – or any other manufacturer – has to do is require of their distributors that they not sell to Dick’s Sporting Goods.  If they are caught doing that, then Ruger does not use those distributors any more.

In fact, this could all be set up in a contractual agreement.  What’s so hard about that?  Why is Ruger dismissing this as if we’re stupid and can’t figure it out?

Trackbacks & Pingbacks


Comments

  1. On May 6, 2018 at 10:32 pm, Uncle Kenny said:

    “…we expect it is safe to assume that you will not be seeing Ruger firearms in their stores. ”

    You might consider that Ruger is sending a very pointed message to its distributors here. It’s one that does not need to get filtered through armies of lawyers, negotiations, and revised distributor agreements. It’s one that can be put in place between the distributors and Dick’s as soon as the next order that Dick’s wants to place.

    And if a distributor doesn’t get the hint? The next time their Ruger contract is up for renewal, there may be a surprise in store for them. At least one would like to think that is what’s happening here.

    Leave it to companies like Dick’s to signal their virtue and have hissy fits. I expect Ruger to behave more professionally and to work with their customers, the distributors, in a businesslike way.

  2. On May 7, 2018 at 6:48 am, Frank Clarke said:

    “All Ruger – or any other manufacturer – has to do is require of their distributors that they not sell to Dick’s Sporting Goods.”

    This could easily be interpreted as “a conspiracy in restraint of trade” which, while it should be none of the government’s business, is still a violation of federal law.

    I think Uncle Kenny interpreted Ruger’s words accurately.

  3. On May 7, 2018 at 8:47 am, Fred said:

    Let me put a finer note on it in case any distributors stop by; if all of these middle men were cut out how much would a Ruger firearm cost me? Now we have a two tiered market incentive in place. I like free markets.

  4. On May 7, 2018 at 10:51 am, Jay Eimer said:

    Ruger probably can’t say that because they’re a publicly traded company – their shareholders are frequently mutual funds and investment groups and not necessarily gun owners.

  5. On May 7, 2018 at 11:16 am, Herschel Smith said:

    @Jay & Frank,

    BoA is a publicly traded company too, and yet they aren’t lending to firearms manufacturers. Is this not a “restraint of trade?” Is Dick’s really going to take Ruger to court over something like that? Are they really going to hire litigation attorneys to depose witnesses and spend time filing court briefs over not supplying Dick’s with guns they won’t sell?

  6. On May 7, 2018 at 12:05 pm, tjbbpgobIII said:

    I just think whomever wrote that headline needs the onsoe meds to help them recognize irony when it literally jumps off the page.

  7. On May 7, 2018 at 12:09 pm, tjbbpgobIII said:

    on some meds, is what I intended to write not osoe meds.

  8. On May 7, 2018 at 12:18 pm, Fred said:

    Jay, Ruger’s revenue stream is gun owners (buyers). These major shareholders aren’t sitting around eating crayons. They know where the money comes from. So all of these decisions are either monetary or philosophical. If somebody doesn’t like a product for whatever reason, including philosophical then fine.

    Herschel & Frank, About Restraint of Trade. Ruger sells to middle men for it’s own convenience. Single buyers greatly simplify supply chain. Period. Ruger, outside of current contracts has no obligation to use tier 1 in their 2 tier system. And BofA? lending is a choice regardless of reason to conclude that Ruger may be a bad investment. But, attempting to harm companies and individuals ability to exercise a civil right is what they are attempting to do. That’s a felony. Since they don’t fear the feds, because both parties are gun controllers, they can openly and blatantly state their reasons for (not) banking this way. VERY IMPORTANTLY, you don’t want them to be forced to loan money to somebody they’d rather not do you? Isn’t this how Barney Frank crashed the housing market…yes.

    One more time: “The rich ruleth over the poor, and the borrower is servant [literal = slave] to the lender.”

    My position is God’s. He said don’t borrow and this shit won’t happen to you.

    You should know, that what is happening in the firearms space on wall street happens to every industry. If I were a dem, I would drive down the prices of these stocks in anticipation of taking one or both houses and then ousting Trump after one term. Think they might-could make a penny if accumulating shares over the next couple years if they do this? Uh, yeah. Drive down price, buy, change environment, price goes up. Happens every day.

    When we get to Heaven we’ll discover that Diane Feinstein’s financial advisor has traded vigorously around the political aspect of gun control, enriching his client (and himself). Just a hunch.

  9. On May 7, 2018 at 12:46 pm, Herschel Smith said:

    @tjbbpgobIII,

    I don’t understand the comment. What “irony?” What “headline?” Who on meds? What meds?

    @Fred,

    Of course it’s for convenience. That’s why I can order a gun online and have it delivered to an FFL and pay a transfer fee.

  10. On May 7, 2018 at 12:48 pm, H said:

    I don’t really know anything about gun sales channels, but if you go with the principle that companies can be good at only a few things, it makes sense for manufacturers to make guns, and distributors to know and manage relationships with zillions of gun stores, and to do preform consolidation functions like selling stores guns from multiple manufacturers. That said, a search just now matched my memory that companies like Ruger also do exclusive deals with distributors.

    Jay Eimer: Ruger only has to make a case that stopping sales to companies like Dicks makes business sense, that they’d lose more if they didn’t because enough outraged gun owners won’t buy their stuff. And use examples like S&W.

    Fred: I think you’ll find Peter Schweizer’s new Secret Empires: How the American Political Class Hides Corruption and Enriches Family and Friends very interesting, although you might want to read his 2013 Extortion: How Politicians Extract Your Money, Buy Votes, and Line Their Own Pockets first for more background on this general angle. Some of the most interesting chapters were on Obama’s “Smash and Grab” tactics, he smashed industries like for profit colleges and coal companies, and his friends and allies then picked up the remains for pennies on the dollars.

  11. On May 7, 2018 at 1:26 pm, TheAlaskan said:

    So…just stop shopping at Dick’s. If they’re that big, they’ll start feeling it. They sell lots of stuff right? Don’t shop there and let anyone know who inquires, why.

    We don’t have Dick’s up here…..stores that is.

  12. On May 7, 2018 at 1:30 pm, TheAlaskan said:

    So…just stop shopping at Dick’s. If they’re that big, they’ll start feeling it. They sell lots of stuff right? Don’t shop there and let anyone know who inquires, why.

    We don’t have Dick’s up here…..stores that is.

    Ruger probably isn’t concerned.

  13. On May 7, 2018 at 2:02 pm, Gryphon said:

    Ultimately, it is the Buyer (who takes the Product Home) who Decides which Retailer survives in the Marketplace; Stupid Decisions by a Retail Merchant to piss off potential Customers are ‘on them’. As for Ruger mandating to Whom a Distributor can re-sell their Products to, I Doubt that having that in a Contract would be grounds for Legal Action, Especially By the second-tier Buyer (Dick’s)

    While it would be Nice to see Ruger or other Manufacturers attempting to Fight Back against Anti-Gun Retailers, in the End it’s up to Us as Gun Purchasers to make the Final Statement. Buy Local, even if you have to Pay a few dollars More, You can be Sure that the Owners of the Local Gun Shops are NOT virtue-signalling libtards with an Anti-American political agenda.

  14. On May 7, 2018 at 2:46 pm, moe mensale said:

    @Frank Clarke,
    “This could easily be interpreted as “a conspiracy in restraint of trade” which, while it should be none of the government’s business, is still a violation of federal law.”

    Good thing this kind of crap doesn’t happen in the medical industry or the financial/banking industry. Oh, wait a minute…..

    15 USC Chapter 1.

  15. On May 7, 2018 at 9:47 pm, Ned said:

    Well, yeah – it’s safe to assume I won’t be seeing, well, anything in Dick’s, because I won’t go in there. However, I will also consider what i will buy in the future. If I find that a manufacturer is selling to an anti-rights outlet, and funding an assault on me, I will most likely purchase some other product that will fulfill the need.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment


You are currently reading "Ruger Facebook Response To Request That They Not Distribute To Dick’s Sporting Goods", entry #19140 on The Captain's Journal.

This article is filed under the category(s) Firearms,Guns and was published May 6th, 2018 by Herschel Smith.

If you're interested in what else the The Captain's Journal has to say, you might try thumbing through the archives and visiting the main index, or; perhaps you would like to learn more about TCJ.

26th MEU (10)
Abu Muqawama (12)
ACOG (2)
ACOGs (1)
Afghan National Army (36)
Afghan National Police (17)
Afghanistan (679)
Afghanistan SOFA (4)
Agriculture in COIN (3)
AGW (1)
Air Force (33)
Air Power (9)
al Qaeda (83)
Ali al-Sistani (1)
America (15)
Ammunition (65)
Animals (26)
Ansar al Sunna (15)
Anthropology (3)
Antonin Scalia (1)
AR-15s (148)
Arghandab River Valley (1)
Arlington Cemetery (2)
Army (70)
Assassinations (2)
Assault Weapon Ban (27)
Australian Army (6)
Azerbaijan (4)
Backpacking (2)
Badr Organization (8)
Baitullah Mehsud (21)
Basra (17)
BATFE (70)
Battle of Bari Alai (2)
Battle of Wanat (17)
Battle Space Weight (3)
Bin Laden (7)
Blogroll (2)
Blogs (12)
Body Armor (18)
Books (3)
Border War (10)
Brady Campaign (1)
Britain (36)
British Army (35)
Camping (4)
Canada (2)
Castle Doctrine (1)
Caucasus (6)
CENTCOM (7)
Center For a New American Security (8)
Charity (3)
China (10)
Christmas (10)
CIA (26)
Civilian National Security Force (3)
Col. Gian Gentile (9)
Combat Outposts (3)
Combat Video (2)
Concerned Citizens (6)
Constabulary Actions (3)
Coolness Factor (2)
COP Keating (4)
Corruption in COIN (4)
Council on Foreign Relations (1)
Counterinsurgency (216)
DADT (2)
David Rohde (1)
Defense Contractors (2)
Department of Defense (141)
Department of Homeland Security (20)
Disaster Preparedness (3)
Distributed Operations (5)
Dogs (12)
Donald Trump (2)
Drone Campaign (3)
EFV (3)
Egypt (12)
El Salvador (1)
Embassy Security (1)
Enemy Spotters (1)
Expeditionary Warfare (17)
F-22 (2)
F-35 (1)
Fallujah (17)
Far East (3)
Fathers and Sons (2)
Favorite (1)
Fazlullah (3)
FBI (26)
Featured (180)
Federal Firearms Laws (18)
Financing the Taliban (2)
Firearms (950)
Football (1)
Force Projection (35)
Force Protection (4)
Force Transformation (1)
Foreign Policy (27)
Fukushima Reactor Accident (6)
Ganjgal (1)
Garmsir (1)
general (15)
General Amos (1)
General James Mattis (1)
General McChrystal (43)
General McKiernan (6)
General Rodriguez (3)
General Suleimani (7)
Georgia (19)
GITMO (2)
Google (1)
Gulbuddin Hekmatyar (1)
Gun Control (886)
Guns (1,451)
Guns In National Parks (3)
Haditha Roundup (10)
Haiti (2)
HAMAS (7)
Haqqani Network (9)
Hate Mail (8)
Hekmatyar (1)
Heroism (4)
Hezbollah (12)
High Capacity Magazines (12)
High Value Targets (9)
Homecoming (1)
Homeland Security (1)
Horses (1)
Humor (17)
ICOS (1)
IEDs (7)
Immigration (76)
India (10)
Infantry (4)
Information Warfare (2)
Infrastructure (2)
Intelligence (23)
Intelligence Bulletin (6)
Iran (169)
Iraq (379)
Iraq SOFA (23)
Islamic Facism (60)
Islamists (90)
Israel (18)
Jaish al Mahdi (21)
Jalalabad (1)
Japan (2)
Jihadists (80)
John Nagl (5)
Joint Intelligence Centers (1)
JRTN (1)
Kabul (1)
Kajaki Dam (1)
Kamdesh (9)
Kandahar (12)
Karachi (7)
Kashmir (2)
Khost Province (1)
Khyber (11)
Knife Blogging (3)
Korea (4)
Korengal Valley (3)
Kunar Province (20)
Kurdistan (3)
Language in COIN (5)
Language in Statecraft (1)
Language Interpreters (2)
Lashkar-e-Taiba (2)
Law Enforcement (3)
Lawfare (7)
Leadership (5)
Lebanon (6)
Leon Panetta (2)
Let Them Fight (2)
Libya (14)
Lines of Effort (3)
Littoral Combat (8)
Logistics (50)
Long Guns (1)
Lt. Col. Allen West (2)
Marine Corps (254)
Marines in Bakwa (1)
Marines in Helmand (67)
Marjah (4)
MEDEVAC (2)
Media (41)
Memorial Day (4)
Mexican Cartels (28)
Mexico (39)
Michael Yon (5)
Micromanaging the Military (7)
Middle East (1)
Military Blogging (26)
Military Contractors (4)
Military Equipment (24)
Militia (5)
Mitt Romney (3)
Monetary Policy (1)
Moqtada al Sadr (2)
Mosul (4)
Mountains (23)
MRAPs (1)
Mullah Baradar (1)
Mullah Fazlullah (1)
Mullah Omar (3)
Musa Qala (4)
Music (16)
Muslim Brotherhood (6)
Nation Building (2)
National Internet IDs (1)
National Rifle Association (38)
NATO (15)
Navy (22)
Navy Corpsman (1)
NCOs (3)
News (1)
NGOs (2)
Nicholas Schmidle (2)
Now Zad (19)
NSA (3)
NSA James L. Jones (6)
Nuclear (57)
Nuristan (8)
Obama Administration (218)
Offshore Balancing (1)
Operation Alljah (7)
Operation Khanjar (14)
Ossetia (7)
Pakistan (165)
Paktya Province (1)
Palestine (5)
Patriotism (6)
Patrolling (1)
Pech River Valley (11)
Personal (54)
Petraeus (14)
Pictures (1)
Piracy (13)
Pistol (2)
Pizzagate (21)
Police (387)
Police in COIN (3)
Policy (15)
Politics (416)
Poppy (2)
PPEs (1)
Prisons in Counterinsurgency (12)
Project Gunrunner (20)
PRTs (1)
Qatar (1)
Quadrennial Defense Review (2)
Quds Force (13)
Quetta Shura (1)
RAND (3)
Recommended Reading (14)
Refueling Tanker (1)
Religion (149)
Religion and Insurgency (19)
Reuters (1)
Rick Perry (4)
Rifles (1)
Roads (4)
Rolling Stone (1)
Ron Paul (1)
ROTC (1)
Rules of Engagement (75)
Rumsfeld (1)
Russia (29)
Sabbatical (1)
Sangin (1)
Saqlawiyah (1)
Satellite Patrols (2)
Saudi Arabia (4)
Scenes from Iraq (1)
Second Amendment (247)
Second Amendment Quick Hits (2)
Secretary Gates (9)
Sharia Law (3)
Shura Ittehad-ul-Mujahiden (1)
SIIC (2)
Sirajuddin Haqqani (1)
Small Wars (72)
Snipers (9)
Sniveling Lackeys (2)
Soft Power (4)
Somalia (8)
Sons of Afghanistan (1)
Sons of Iraq (2)
Special Forces (28)
Squad Rushes (1)
State Department (19)
Statistics (1)
Sunni Insurgency (10)
Support to Infantry Ratio (1)
Supreme Court (3)
Survival (20)
SWAT Raids (54)
Syria (38)
Tactical Drills (1)
Tactical Gear (3)
Taliban (167)
Taliban Massing of Forces (4)
Tarmiyah (1)
TBI (1)
Technology (16)
Tehrik-i-Taliban (78)
Terrain in Combat (1)
Terrorism (94)
Thanksgiving (8)
The Anbar Narrative (23)
The Art of War (5)
The Fallen (1)
The Long War (20)
The Surge (3)
The Wounded (13)
Thomas Barnett (1)
Transnational Insurgencies (5)
Tribes (5)
TSA (17)
TSA Ineptitude (11)
TTPs (1)
U.S. Border Patrol (5)
U.S. Border Security (14)
U.S. Sovereignty (17)
UAVs (2)
UBL (4)
Ukraine (3)
Uncategorized (55)
Universal Background Check (3)
Unrestricted Warfare (4)
USS Iwo Jima (2)
USS San Antonio (1)
Uzbekistan (1)
V-22 Osprey (4)
Veterans (2)
Vietnam (1)
War & Warfare (216)
War & Warfare (40)
War Movies (3)
War Reporting (18)
Wardak Province (1)
Warriors (6)
Waziristan (1)
Weapons and Tactics (60)
West Point (1)
Winter Operations (1)
Women in Combat (20)
WTF? (1)
Yemen (1)

March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006

about · archives · contact · register

Copyright © 2006-2019 Captain's Journal. All rights reserved.