The Second Amendment And Illegal Aliens

BY Herschel Smith
4 years, 1 month ago

Bob Unruh at WND:

Americans are being warned that the danger from the porous United States borders has increased because of a federal appeals court’s determination that illegal aliens have a right to keep and bear arms under the U.S. Constitution’s Second Amendment.

“Just think: Illegal aliens who are about to be deported have standing to sue for gun rights, but the sheriff of the fourth largest county located near the border, Joe Arpaio of Maricopa County, has no standing to sue Obama for violating the law and flooding his jurisdiction with illegal immigrants,” wrote Daniel Horowitz at Conservative Review.

The outrage came on the heels of a ruling from the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that said people “living in the United States illegally” share in the Second Amendment right.

In the ruling, which conflicts with the decisions of several other appeals courts, the Chicago-based court ruled one particular illegal alien was barred from possessing weapons because of a federal statute.

But the three-judge panel said Mariano Meza-Rodriguez is among “the people” cited in the Constitution and thus would be granted the right “to keep and bear arms” if not for the federal law.

He was found to have a bullet in his pocket when he was apprehended, but he argued that the charges that ensued should be dismissed because he possesses Second Amendment rights.

The author of the opinion, Judge Diane Wood, wrote, “We see no principled way to carve out the Second Amendment and say that the unauthorized (or maybe all noncitizens) are excluded.”

[ … ]

Bob Owens at Bearing Arms said, “I don’t think for a second that the Founding Fathers would support the concept of granting criminal invaders the same legal status as legal immigrants, legal resident aliens, and citizens.”

I don’t go where Bob Owens does on this.  This isn’t about the second amendment to me.  I took a strong stand against illegal aliens and bearing arms before (I cannot recall where, perhaps in a comment at reddit/guns, or at Say Uncle), and was savaged, as if I was anti-gun.

There is a libertarian case against the ownership of weapons by illegal aliens.  It’s simple.  You cannot do things to take actions that adversely affect others, and the mere presence of illegal aliens on my home soil adversely affects me.

Libertarians notwithstanding, you do not have a right to do anything you want any time you want.  Your rights are circumscribed by God.  God gives me the right to own weapons.  God does not give illegal aliens the right to be in my country.  The discussion about weapons for illegal aliens shouldn’t even come up.  Let central and South America figure it out.

I don’t have to turn to the founding fathers to figure this out.  But what’s so rich about this – and Bob Unruh points this out – is that judges who would otherwise vomit at the notion of God-given rights and bearing arms, suddenly find it necessary to expand this right to people who have no right to be on this soil.  It must suck to be a progressive and face logical problems like this.  Being impaled on the horns of a dilemma is the sort of thing that sticks to your innards.


Comments

  1. On August 31, 2015 at 7:07 am, UNCLEELMO said:

    The last two sentences of this article kind of surprise me. I would have thought you knew progressives better than that, Herschel.

    First, they don’t deal in logic, they deal in emotion. It wouldn’t be fair that a white redneck could own a gun when someone with brown skin that is only looking to ‘improve his life’ (and have sex with your 14 year old daughter) can’t. It wouldn’t be ‘fair’.

    Second, you needn’t worry about anything being stuck in a progressive’s innards. They’ve never made a mistake in their entire lives. The only thing they fret about is getting caught. And then they don’t atone for their sins, they get even.

    Whenever I read a court decision that make less than zero sense, I Wikipedia the judge’s profile. The three things in this judge’s background that explain her decision are Chicago, Austin, Texas and Bill Clinton.

    And then there is this- ‘Commentators have called Wood a leading candidate for nomination to the U.S. Supreme Court by President Barack Obama.’
    What more do you need to know?

  2. On August 31, 2015 at 12:49 pm, MadMagyar said:

    It was brought to my attention decades ago that the Constitution protected the natural rights of ALL people who were on this soil, whether they are ‘citizens’ or not. Thus Yick Wo had every natural right protected against the usurpations of Sheriff Hopkins back in the 1850’s (q.v.) whether or not he was a ‘citizen’ of the U.S. If this were not so, cops could get away with violating the rights of everybody who was perceived (by them) at the time of their encounter as not a citizen. The question is not whether this illegal alien had any Constitutionally protected rights, but whether he was here illegally – and it should have stopped there. I agree they should ALL be kicked out, but don’t violate their natural rights. He had every much a right to self protection as we do. If he’s a criminal, then treat him like every other criminal who IS a ‘citizen’. Of course federal citizenship is an entirely different matter, but even criminals who ARE citizens of this nation have their natural right to keep and bear arms up to the point where they are convicted of a felony.

    The gist of this is that we often confuse ‘civil’ rights with natural rights. One can be granted (and taken away) where the other cannot.

  3. On August 31, 2015 at 1:13 pm, Archer said:

    “The question is not whether this illegal alien had any Constitutionally
    protected rights, but whether he was here illegally – and it should have
    stopped there.”

    He’d still have Constitutionally-protected rights. He’d get a trial, wherein he’d have an attorney present and the government would present evidence that he is, in fact, in the country illegally. It’d likely be an open-and-shut case, but the Constitution demands we go through the motions.

    But that’s where it should end. He has the natural right to keep and bear arms (I believe this is a God-given right, whether or not his country of origin recognizes it), but he does not have the right to do so on American soil by nature of the fact that he doesn’t have the right to be on American soil; he also can’t get an American drivers’ license or own American land or property.

    After that determination, the question of whether he can keep and bear arms in America becomes moot. If he lacks the right to be here, it follows that he cannot bear arms here — not that he cannot bear arms generally, just that he cannot do so here, where he has no right to be.

  4. On August 31, 2015 at 4:13 pm, Old Curmudgen said:

    Actually, illegals can get Texas driver licenses by certifying that they tried to get a Social Security number but could not. That’s a recent decision by the Texas Department of Public Safety. A few years ago one couldn’t obtain a TX-DL or ID without providing a SSN…a rather narrow-minded decision on the State’s part.

  5. On August 31, 2015 at 1:21 pm, Herschel Smith said:

    I suppose I have to disagree and say that I do not believe in the concept of “natural rights.” God gives rights and He stipulates their liberty and usage. Thus, since you would say that someone DOESN’T have the right to come into your home with a weapon and effect self defense, I would similarly say that someone doesn’t have a right to invade my country and carry a weapon or effect self defense.

  6. On August 31, 2015 at 5:07 pm, milesfortis said:

    That last one is quite interesting sir. And also quite informative.
    “I would similarly say that someone [an illegal alien] doesn’t have a right to …..effect self defense.”
    Do you understand the term ‘smorgasbording’? For those who may not have heard the term, it means picking and choosing what we like and what we don’t like.
    We use it pejoratively to accuse the left of using it against rights they say we don’t really have. Yet, you are saying that some people have certain rights and some others don’t, in this case; self defense?
    So, they can’t even defend themselves? I think you may need to think that one over again.

  7. On August 31, 2015 at 5:18 pm, Herschel Smith said:

    Not even nearly convincing. Not nearly. You’re light years away. If you’re in my home illegally, you forfeited your rights at the door. God says so by giving me Biblical permission to kill you, as just a single example. If you’re in my country illegally, you forfeited your rights.

    Go back to what I said earlier, and I think if you ponder hard on this you’ll see what I mean. I don’t believe in “natural rights.” God gives rights and circumscribes their application. Think — the difference between John Locke and John Calvin.

  8. On August 31, 2015 at 7:42 pm, milesfortis said:

    Well, we’ll have to agree that we disagree about how God deigns to give rights.
    And while your house most certainly is your castle and lethal actions taken therein have quite a lot of biblical and current legal protections that we happen to be in agreement on, I seriously advise that you not use that particular defense (illegal aliens has no rights, simply because of their status) if you happen to kill one somewhere else.

  9. On September 1, 2015 at 10:18 am, Herschel Smith said:

    I wouldn’t because the courts don’t recognize the legitimacy of my argument.

    I think what you’re doing in your (justifiable and understandable) mistrust of the federal government is de factor denying what is really the only constitutional and legitimate function of the federal government, which is the common defense, of which secure borders is part.

    I don’t really think you can logically connect my opposition to illegals being armed to the government having the right to develop lists of people (legal citizens) who cannot be armed. It may be an emotional case, and it certainly tugs at your heart strings because you know how untrustworthy the .gov is, but making the case that illegals shouldn’t be armed isn’t the same thing as saying the .gov has a right to disarm you or me.

    Where do you stop? Precisely where we say so. With illegals and no farther. I see no logical problem whatsoever.

    We have a right to borders. And in order to get the force of the argument, replace the (highly untrustworthy) .gov we know with medieval families, clans, tribes or nations. Consider the example that a tribe has a justifiable claim to land (centuries old), and yet some other clan ensconces themselves in the middle of that claim and wields weapons because they have some sort of “natural” right to be armed.

    Unpersuasive. What they really have at that point is a natural right to be killed.

  10. On August 31, 2015 at 9:15 pm, Carl Stevenson said:

    Bingo. Illegals (and their progeny) should have NO rights. Rights should be reserved for citizens and lawfully admitted immigrants.

  11. On August 31, 2015 at 1:54 pm, George Talbot said:

    An illegal alien who crossed the border illegally is in the process of a misdemeanor. If he carries a gun, he is carrying a gun in the process of a misdemeanor, which carries various legal penalties. (It’s different for overstaying a visa, alas, and a lawyer would probably quibble about how long ago the actual border crossing portion was.)

  12. On August 31, 2015 at 4:16 pm, Brian Coss said:

    “The District of Columbia spent almost two years persecuting a good man [a US citizen] because
    they wrongly thought he had guns in the city. It wasn’t enough to prosecute Mark Witaschek for having one [defective] shotgun shell and a box of muzzleloader bullets. After a three-month trial that ended in a conviction, the city [Washington DC] started an investigation into the businessman’s taxes.”
    http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/apr/9/miller-how-government-tyranny-destroyed-a-dc-busin/?page=all

    A well managed Federal Government should spend our tax dollars fighting the collectivist local governments, in places like DC, before spending tax dollars defending the rights of non-citizens. Failing at this sends the message that the Feds do not care about the rights of their citizens,.

  13. On August 31, 2015 at 9:16 pm, Carl Stevenson said:

    They don’t, or they wouldn’t constantly be attempting to infringe and destroy them.

  14. On September 1, 2015 at 9:31 am, hutch1200 said:

    Hence, how did this person have “Standing”? Yet Arpaio, an ELECTED OFFICIAL, has less rights (Standing). So yes I do agree w/you Brian.
    Would a decent analogy be that few legal Citizens who get caught speeding/reckless driving, while DUI are actually prosecuted for the speeding charge as well, when it comes to trial? A Misdemeanor vs possible Felony.
    Leaving a murder weapon at the scene isn’t considered littering. OK, that last 1 may be…uhm, off a bit?

  15. On August 31, 2015 at 8:07 pm, Paul X said:

    This is pretty much the same argument, as that ex-felons should not be armed. Anyone who goes down this path has the fond thanks of the ruling class. Establish the principle that government may concoct a list of people who may “legitimately” be disarmed. Then see where that ends up. Best case, it ends up in war. Worst case, in slavery.

    Everybody should be armed. Even “illegal” people.

  16. On August 31, 2015 at 9:19 pm, Carl Stevenson said:

    I’d rather see citizen felons have their rights restored after serving their full sentences and showing some evidence of true rehabilitation that to grant the rights of citizens to illegals who continue to violate our laws without shame or repentance.

  17. On September 1, 2015 at 9:33 am, hutch1200 said:

    For non-violent felonies, agreed.

  18. On September 1, 2015 at 9:49 pm, Paul X said:

    “Our laws”? Sorry, they are not my laws. See if you can prosecute Hillary for violating “our laws”. Good luck on that one.

    Laws are just diktats from a corrupt and evil ruling class. I’m glad at least some people have the gumption to ignore them. What are you going to do when the law tells you to turn your guns in?

  19. On August 31, 2015 at 9:12 pm, Carl Stevenson said:

    The judges are treasonous badtards who should be removed from office and hanged.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment


You are currently reading "The Second Amendment And Illegal Aliens", entry #14052 on The Captain's Journal.

This article is filed under the category(s) Mexico,Second Amendment and was published August 30th, 2015 by Herschel Smith.

If you're interested in what else the The Captain's Journal has to say, you might try thumbing through the archives and visiting the main index, or; perhaps you would like to learn more about TCJ.

26th MEU (10)
Abu Muqawama (12)
ACOG (2)
ACOGs (1)
Afghan National Army (36)
Afghan National Police (17)
Afghanistan (679)
Afghanistan SOFA (4)
Agriculture in COIN (3)
AGW (1)
Air Force (34)
Air Power (9)
al Qaeda (83)
Ali al-Sistani (1)
America (17)
Ammunition (80)
Animals (41)
Ansar al Sunna (15)
Anthropology (3)
Antonin Scalia (1)
AR-15s (184)
Arghandab River Valley (1)
Arlington Cemetery (2)
Army (73)
Assassinations (2)
Assault Weapon Ban (27)
Australian Army (6)
Azerbaijan (4)
Backpacking (2)
Badr Organization (8)
Baitullah Mehsud (21)
Basra (17)
BATFE (81)
Battle of Bari Alai (2)
Battle of Wanat (18)
Battle Space Weight (3)
Bin Laden (7)
Blogroll (2)
Blogs (16)
Body Armor (18)
Books (3)
Border War (10)
Brady Campaign (1)
Britain (38)
British Army (35)
Camping (4)
Canada (2)
Castle Doctrine (1)
Caucasus (6)
CENTCOM (7)
Center For a New American Security (8)
Charity (3)
China (10)
Christmas (10)
CIA (27)
Civilian National Security Force (3)
Col. Gian Gentile (9)
Combat Outposts (3)
Combat Video (2)
Concerned Citizens (6)
Constabulary Actions (3)
Coolness Factor (2)
COP Keating (4)
Corruption in COIN (4)
Council on Foreign Relations (1)
Counterinsurgency (216)
DADT (2)
David Rohde (1)
Defense Contractors (2)
Department of Defense (143)
Department of Homeland Security (22)
Disaster Preparedness (3)
Distributed Operations (5)
Dogs (12)
Donald Trump (24)
Drone Campaign (3)
EFV (3)
Egypt (12)
El Salvador (1)
Embassy Security (1)
Enemy Spotters (1)
Expeditionary Warfare (17)
F-22 (2)
F-35 (1)
Fallujah (17)
Far East (3)
Fathers and Sons (2)
Favorite (1)
Fazlullah (3)
FBI (29)
Featured (180)
Federal Firearms Laws (18)
Financing the Taliban (2)
Firearms (1,015)
Football (1)
Force Projection (35)
Force Protection (4)
Force Transformation (1)
Foreign Policy (27)
Fukushima Reactor Accident (6)
Ganjgal (1)
Garmsir (1)
general (15)
General Amos (1)
General James Mattis (1)
General McChrystal (43)
General McKiernan (6)
General Rodriguez (3)
General Suleimani (7)
Georgia (19)
GITMO (2)
Google (1)
Gulbuddin Hekmatyar (1)
Gun Control (1,065)
Guns (1,516)
Guns In National Parks (3)
Haditha Roundup (10)
Haiti (2)
HAMAS (7)
Haqqani Network (9)
Hate Mail (8)
Hekmatyar (1)
Heroism (4)
Hezbollah (12)
High Capacity Magazines (13)
High Value Targets (9)
Homecoming (1)
Homeland Security (1)
Horses (1)
Humor (20)
ICOS (1)
IEDs (7)
Immigration (83)
India (10)
Infantry (4)
Information Warfare (2)
Infrastructure (2)
Intelligence (23)
Intelligence Bulletin (6)
Iran (169)
Iraq (379)
Iraq SOFA (23)
Islamic Facism (62)
Islamists (92)
Israel (18)
Jaish al Mahdi (21)
Jalalabad (1)
Japan (2)
Jihadists (80)
John Nagl (5)
Joint Intelligence Centers (1)
JRTN (1)
Kabul (1)
Kajaki Dam (1)
Kamdesh (9)
Kandahar (12)
Karachi (7)
Kashmir (2)
Khost Province (1)
Khyber (11)
Knife Blogging (4)
Korea (4)
Korengal Valley (3)
Kunar Province (20)
Kurdistan (3)
Language in COIN (5)
Language in Statecraft (1)
Language Interpreters (2)
Lashkar-e-Taiba (2)
Law Enforcement (3)
Lawfare (7)
Leadership (5)
Lebanon (6)
Leon Panetta (2)
Let Them Fight (2)
Libya (14)
Lines of Effort (3)
Littoral Combat (8)
Logistics (50)
Long Guns (1)
Lt. Col. Allen West (2)
Marine Corps (258)
Marines in Bakwa (1)
Marines in Helmand (67)
Marjah (4)
MEDEVAC (2)
Media (42)
Memorial Day (5)
Mexican Cartels (33)
Mexico (46)
Michael Yon (5)
Micromanaging the Military (7)
Middle East (1)
Military Blogging (26)
Military Contractors (4)
Military Equipment (24)
Militia (5)
Mitt Romney (3)
Monetary Policy (1)
Moqtada al Sadr (2)
Mosul (4)
Mountains (25)
MRAPs (1)
Mullah Baradar (1)
Mullah Fazlullah (1)
Mullah Omar (3)
Musa Qala (4)
Music (16)
Muslim Brotherhood (6)
Nation Building (2)
National Internet IDs (1)
National Rifle Association (62)
NATO (15)
Navy (22)
Navy Corpsman (1)
NCOs (3)
News (1)
NGOs (2)
Nicholas Schmidle (2)
Now Zad (19)
NSA (3)
NSA James L. Jones (6)
Nuclear (57)
Nuristan (8)
Obama Administration (218)
Offshore Balancing (1)
Operation Alljah (7)
Operation Khanjar (14)
Ossetia (7)
Pakistan (165)
Paktya Province (1)
Palestine (5)
Patriotism (6)
Patrolling (1)
Pech River Valley (11)
Personal (58)
Petraeus (14)
Pictures (1)
Piracy (13)
Pistol (2)
Pizzagate (21)
Police (416)
Police in COIN (3)
Policy (15)
Politics (453)
Poppy (2)
PPEs (1)
Prisons in Counterinsurgency (12)
Project Gunrunner (20)
PRTs (1)
Qatar (1)
Quadrennial Defense Review (2)
Quds Force (13)
Quetta Shura (1)
RAND (3)
Recommended Reading (14)
Refueling Tanker (1)
Religion (165)
Religion and Insurgency (19)
Reuters (1)
Rick Perry (4)
Rifles (1)
Roads (4)
Rolling Stone (1)
Ron Paul (1)
ROTC (1)
Rules of Engagement (75)
Rumsfeld (1)
Russia (29)
Sabbatical (1)
Sangin (1)
Saqlawiyah (1)
Satellite Patrols (2)
Saudi Arabia (4)
Scenes from Iraq (1)
Second Amendment (266)
Second Amendment Quick Hits (2)
Secretary Gates (9)
Sharia Law (3)
Shura Ittehad-ul-Mujahiden (1)
SIIC (2)
Sirajuddin Haqqani (1)
Small Wars (72)
Snipers (9)
Sniveling Lackeys (2)
Soft Power (4)
Somalia (8)
Sons of Afghanistan (1)
Sons of Iraq (2)
Special Forces (28)
Squad Rushes (1)
State Department (20)
Statistics (1)
Sunni Insurgency (10)
Support to Infantry Ratio (1)
Supreme Court (5)
Survival (26)
SWAT Raids (54)
Syria (38)
Tactical Drills (1)
Tactical Gear (4)
Taliban (167)
Taliban Massing of Forces (4)
Tarmiyah (1)
TBI (1)
Technology (17)
Tehrik-i-Taliban (78)
Terrain in Combat (1)
Terrorism (95)
Thanksgiving (8)
The Anbar Narrative (23)
The Art of War (5)
The Fallen (1)
The Long War (20)
The Surge (3)
The Wounded (13)
Thomas Barnett (1)
Transnational Insurgencies (5)
Tribes (5)
TSA (18)
TSA Ineptitude (11)
TTPs (1)
U.S. Border Patrol (5)
U.S. Border Security (14)
U.S. Sovereignty (17)
UAVs (2)
UBL (4)
Ukraine (3)
Uncategorized (56)
Universal Background Check (3)
Unrestricted Warfare (4)
USS Iwo Jima (2)
USS San Antonio (1)
Uzbekistan (1)
V-22 Osprey (4)
Veterans (2)
Vietnam (1)
War & Warfare (220)
War & Warfare (40)
War Movies (3)
War Reporting (19)
Wardak Province (1)
Warriors (6)
Waziristan (1)
Weapons and Tactics (62)
West Point (1)
Winter Operations (1)
Women in Combat (21)
WTF? (1)
Yemen (1)

October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006

about · archives · contact · register

Copyright © 2006-2019 Captain's Journal. All rights reserved.