How To Zero A 30-30 Rifle With Open Sights
BY Herschel Smith
For EDC, a larger dot of 6, 8 or even 10 MOA in diameter will serve your purposes much better than the currently popular smaller dots of 1, 2 or 3 MOA. The reasons are almost infinite, but some more obvious than others.
Assuming time is of the essence when engaging an adversary with your EDC pistol, the speed with which the red dot can be located and superimposed over the target is of supreme importance. The bigger the dot, the easier it is to find and direct to the target. Some may argue that a big dot is not as accurate as a small dot, therefore might not be as effective because it covers too much of the target. Let’s stop and examine that thinking by doing a little math.
A 10-MOA dot covers roughly a 10-inch diameter area at 100 yards. That subtends down to 5 inches at 50 yards, 2.5 inches at 25 yards and 1 inch at 10 yards.
I won’t judge another person’s shot-delivery capabilities under the stress of a life-or-death situation, but it would seem that a 10-MOA dot would be sufficient when considering the statistical data of the encounter being in close proximity. For the average citizen, my definition of close proximity can be thought of as the inability to escape the situation, making the use of a deadly weapon the only available choice to prevent grave bodily harm or death. This is not legal advice, just my perspective. Keep in mind that time and distance almost always have an impact on one another during a dynamic event.
I don’t know. Based on the pictures presented of various dot sizes, I don’t like the large ones. I don’t really have a hard time picking up iron sights. I’m not sure how that translates to red dots.
What size do readers carry, and why?
The extent of this isn’t clear to me from the article.
Remington Firearms, the country’s oldest gun manufacturer, will be moving its headquarters from Ilion, New York, to Georgia, the company announced Monday.
As part of the deal, the company said it would invest $100 million in the operation and hire 856 people over a five-year period in Troup County.
It was not immediately clear what effect the transfer would have on Remington’s operations in New York and Tennessee. The company owns the parts of the former Remington Outdoor Co. which makes rifles, shotguns, and some handguns after the former parent auctioned its assets in pieces last year during a bankruptcy proceeding in Alabama.
Investors doing business as the Roundhill Group purchased the Remington-branded gun-making business, including operations in Ilion, New York, and Lenoir City, Tennessee, for $13 million.
[ … ]
Phil Smith, a spokesperson for the United Mine Workers of America, which represents some workers at a factory in Ilion, said the union had no information about whether workers in New York would be affected. The new owners recently restarted operations there, calling back more than 200 workers who had been laid off. The local government in New York offered 10 years of tax breaks in exchange for the restart and upgrades.
Well, at this point, you can color me confused. I don’t know what parts are left after the sale, what is moving, and what they will be manufacturing.
This move is far too late, but I hope they can make a go of it and get back to good guns after Cerberus financially engineered the life out of them.
And if they want to make good stuff without the hassle of a union, getting to a right to work state is the best idea. Keep the union out.
I always like real world and ballistic tests.
Interesting results for the birdshot.
Not for precision shooting – for hunting.
I think I agree with one of the comments. His final bullet was probably due to shooting slightly uphill.
He wants to do some custom things to the gun that I would not choose to do. If I am ever able to purchase this gun, I will leave it as is, except for installation of optics.
Readers seemed to like the gun when I posted previously, so I thought this would be a good update. I haven’t seen any negative reviews of this gun anywhere.
Also, Shooting Sports USA has a review up.
I keep hearing folks complain about 1911 reliability, and frankly I’m nonplussed every time I hear it. Out of thousands and thousands of round through two 1911s, I’ve never had a single FTF/FTE. No malfunctions of any kind, and that’s without extensive cleaning (although I do lubricate them before range trips). Then again, these are high quality 1911s.
But I do enjoy listening to Ken Hackathorn and Bill Wilson discuss the history and engineering behind Browning’s design. It was a gun built around the cartridge. This is fine with me – I like the cartridge. I always have, and I shoot it better than any other.
I haven’t tried it, but I don’t think I very much like it. It seems to me that if you intend actually to use it, you’d better practice it a lot.
It’s a very long article with pros and cons on each of the many guns they tested. The Beretta A400 Xtreme Plus was the winner.
The post title is correct. That’s good shooting by both of them.
Of course, she’s shooting a very nice 223 rifle (SAKO) with a very long barrel (24″) along with a heavy bullet (80.5 grain Berger). But still, that’s good shooting and a great job of taking the 223 out that far.