Supreme Court Can No Longer Ingnore The AR 15
BY Herschel Smith
1 month, 2 weeks ago
Oh sure they can. They ignored the Snope case (Maryland AWB) until it just went away. They can continue that as long as they are cowardly, which is to say, indefinitely. Will they? I don’t know.
But isn’t it interesting how we’ve been conditioned concerning the SCOTUS? They only want to hear cases where there is a circuit split, so we’re told. There must be a circuit split.
Bhah! There are plenty of SCOTUS decisions on cases where there weren’t circuit splits. Besides, is it not reasonable for the supreme court to take cases where all of the inferior courts are trampling the God-give rights of American, recognized in the constitution?
On November 18, 2025 at 9:23 am, X said:
The Supreme Court is a political institution of government bullshit and sophistry. The Constitution is practically meaningless.
The Court will never rule that every American is entitled to own an AR and a 30-round magazine, because that would present a threat to the government, which the Court is part of.
However as a political matter, because there are millions of ARs out there than they know they cannot round them all up, they will probably come up with some nonsense about how states can regulate them if they are registered, etc. or ban the sale or manufacture of them.
That’s exactly what New York did with the “SAFE Act.” They didn’t kick in doors and take all the guns, they halted all sales (except for “law enforcement” of course) and allowed people to keep them if they were registered. It’s been in effect for over 12 years and has not been struck down. The manufacturers still happily supply the cops who use ARs that are “weapons of war” that “don’t belong on our streets” if YOU want to have one.
Speaking of New York, after it lost the Bruen case and the Court told the State it must issue CCW permits, the State responded by banning carry almost everywhere. The process for getting a permit remains unconstitutionally burdensome. Yet the Court has none nothing.
It’s all bullshit to string people along with the false belief that they have “rights” and can have their day in court, when in fact the government always wins.
On November 18, 2025 at 9:27 am, X said:
I might also add that they did the same thing with the NFA in 1934. You could keep your machine gun if you registered it but going forward it was extremely difficult for a private person to get one. Government — no problemo.
The NFA has been in effect for 91 years and the Court has not struck it down. They won’t. The gun-banners have cleverly figured out that if they can apply the NFA precedent to semi-auto ARs, they can effectively ban them while they still technically remain “legal.”
On November 24, 2025 at 2:46 am, kick against said:
SCROTUS under comrade kommissar Roberts?
Worthless.