There Will Be Resistance

BY Herschel Smith
11 years, 5 months ago

There will be resistance.

In his boldest terms yet, he vowed to rally the American people around an agenda to limit gun violence and said he still supports increased background checks and bans on assault weapons and high capacity bullet magazines.

“It is not enough for us to say, ‘This is too hard so we’re not going to try,'” Obama said. “So what I intend to do is I will call all the stakeholders together. I will meet with Republicans. I will meet with Democrats. I will talk to anybody.

“I think there are a vast majority of responsible gun owners out there who recognize that we can’t have a situation in which somebody with severe psychological problems is able to get the kind of high capacity weapons that this individual in Newtown obtained and gun down our kids. And, yes, it’s going to be hard.”

Obama’s comments come as the schoolroom shooting has elevated the issue of gun violence to the forefront of public attention.

[ … ]

Obama said he intended to press the issue with the public.

“Will there be resistance? Absolutely there will be resistance,” he said.

Resistance.  Uh huh.  Perhaps Mr. Obama doesn’t fully understand the nature of that resistance?  Or perhaps other forms of it?

A bill filed by state Sen. Lee Bright a day before the elementary school massacre in Newtown, Conn., would allow S.C. residents to buy firearms, ammunition and gun accessories made in the state, even if they violate federal gun-control laws.

Bright, R-Roebuck, introduced The Firearms Freedom Act last year, but the bill died in committee. Bright re-introduced his bill on Dec. 13 — the day before 20 children and seven adults were killed in Newtown — and hopes for a better outcome this time. Despite the renewed and heated national debate over gun control in the wake of the Newtown shootings, Bright told the Spartanburg Herald-Journal he believes there is actually more enthusiasm now for his bill.

“A lot of people are showing a lot of interest in it. We’ve got a better chance now than we had previously,” Bright told the newspaper. In addition to South Carolina being a gun-friendly state, Bright’s positive outlook is also bolstered by a recent Gallup poll that showed the strident pro-gun National Rifle Association held a 54 percent favorability rating among Americans.

The concept behind the bill? The federal government may regulate interstate commerce, but South Carolina gun manufacturers should be able to skirt federal laws and make and sell whatever they like within the state since their guns, gun parts, and accessories would not cross state lines.

The concept isn’t exactly new or novel. Montana was the first state to pass such legislation, though it is currently tied up in litigation in federal court. Regardless, eight other states have passed identical legislation, and similar bills have been introduced in a score of other states, including South Carolina.

Perhaps such a law would be protected for state manufacturers by the power of the state police or National Guard?

Mike Vanderboegh has also commented on the nature of the resistance from his neck of the woods.

UPDATE: David Codrea correctly notes that concerning the resistance, there will be “many forms of it.”

UPDATE #2: The Other McCain comments as well on the resistance.

UPDATE #3: John Bernard writes in with this.

I can’t ever remember a politician throwing down a gauntlet like that. This guy is telling the entire population that he is prepared for whatever death and destruction (he apparently sees as inevitable). He is also telling at least one third of the population that we can expect to be taken out if we don’t comply.

And I haven’t heard a single argument from anyone in the media or congress or anywhere else for that matter.

I think we have just witnessed the death of the 2nd amendment because the dopes in Congress are not going to put their precious careers in harm’s way simply to protect something the majority wants abolished.

I want to see how they characterize those first few skirmishes when the goons come out “to play”.



UPDATE #4: Thanks to Glenn Reynolds for the attention.

Trackbacks & Pingbacks


  1. On December 31, 2012 at 2:44 pm, MamaLiberty said:

    He’s already proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that he’s perfectly willing to murder millions in order to push his agenda. Americans are about to learn that this includes THEM, in whatever numbers are deemed necessary – as long as he doesn’t personally have to touch anything, of course. Wonder how many of the “enforcement” folks are down with that.

    It’s about to get ugly.

  2. On December 31, 2012 at 6:11 pm, richard40 said:

    I hope Obamas allies get ths bill to the floor. There are still senators and congressmen left in red and swing districts trying to pose as moderates. If they vote against this Obama will suffer a well deserved defeat. If they vote for it, they will have been smoked out for defeat in 2014. This is a gross overeach by Obama, he has no idea how strong pro gun sentiment is in this country. I have a friend who votes dem most of the time, but he is also strongly pro gun, and will punish anybody who suports this bill.

  3. On December 31, 2012 at 7:01 pm, Fred said:

    Calm down people. This is exactly the kind of over-reaction you are being tricked into, in order to justify a reaction. Let him hang himself with his own words. I VERY seriously doubt 90% of US LEOs or MIL would go door to door to seize guns, or fire on citizens.

    Chill, and use your voting power for those House Repubs and Governors who buckle under.

  4. On December 31, 2012 at 7:10 pm, JoeFromSidney said:

    I disagree with Fred. It will be the credible threat of armed resistance that will make armed resistance unnecessary.

    As for the cops and the police, “We were just obeying orders.” Would you really want to live in a society in which the cops and the police decided which orders they’d obey and which they wouldn’t?

  5. On January 1, 2013 at 7:16 am, Cain said:

    “As for the cops and the police, “We were just obeying orders.” Would you really want to live in a society in which the cops and the police decided which orders they’d obey and which they wouldn’t?”

    I most certainly want to live in a society in which the police decide to disobey orders they know full well to be illegal/unconstitutional.

  6. On January 1, 2013 at 10:17 am, Bill said:

    I take the threat very seriously. I remember throughout the obamacare debacle many were saying it wouldn’t pass. By illegal action it did. Then many were saying the supreme court will strike it down. It didn’t. Then it was Obama won’t be re-elected. He was.
    As for the argument that the troops and police won’t take our guns. Just remember what happened in Louisiana after hurricane katrina. The national guard was seizing weapons from people in their own homes. I believe many, too many, will indeed just follow orders.
    One thing to do now is donate to the various gun rights organizations to support them in their lobbying against upcoming gun ban legislation. With the election just over, right now that is the only option we have.

  7. On January 1, 2013 at 4:06 pm, IGotBupkis, Legally Defined Cyberbully in all 57 States said:

    }}}} I think we have just witnessed the death of the 2nd amendment because the dopes in Congress are not going to put their precious careers in harm’s way simply to protect something the majority wants abolished.

    Where’s this “majority”, Kemosabe? I see one hell of a loud minority. I don’t see a majority AT ALL.

    }}}}}}}} “As for the cops and the police, “We were just obeying orders.” Would you really want to live in a society in which the cops and the police decided which orders they’d obey and which they wouldn’t?”

    }}} I most certainly want to live in a society in which the police decide to disobey orders they know full well to be illegal/unconstitutional.

    Indeed. Moreover, this happens EVERY DAY. What do you think a cop is doing when he lets you off a traffic stop with a warning? There’s nothing in the law that gives him the discretion to not enforce the law, but he does it, because he’s (hopefully) making a rational, on-the-scene decision that THIS case of the law’s possible breaking does not require society’s full attention.

    If the cops enforced every one of the 10k+ pages of FEDERAL law alone, we’d need 10x the police force and 50x the court personnel. So they pick and choose which laws they’ll “flap” on (in the Swiftian sense).

  8. On January 1, 2013 at 4:54 pm, Herschel Smith said:

    I think my majority, my friend means the majority of the dopes in Congress, not the American public.

  9. On January 2, 2013 at 10:51 pm, MarineOfficer said:

    I think that Montana (possibly Wyoming) attempted similar legislation in the past, but I’m not sure how it turned out, I’m googling that now.

    There are 2 competing issues here. First, gun-grabbers are playing the long game (and winning it). It is well understood that electoral politics right now mean that the “middle” of the country still matters, despite the population moving more and more to the coasts. It is only a matter of time before coastal votes reach critical mas to overwhelm “red state” votes, and either alter the voting balance in the Congress, or flat out reach the ability to constrict gun laws down through federal legislation, or straight out amendment of the constitution through Article V. This is what we must fight against on one hand to maintain the legitimacy of our right to bear arms.

    Secondly, I believe we must keep our “eyes on the prize” of what matters here. The “right to bear arms” is already a shadow of its former self, through such legislation as the National Firearms Act. I agree with Hershel completely that the “Assault Weapons Ban,” and similar measures are non-sense. But where I see them as dangerous is that they created inflated markets that made simple things like magazines bubble in value. How many Americans were priced out of the self-defense market by such laws? That’s the second prong of the strategy.

    I do not think that “gun grabbing” legislation will pass the Congress. I also do not believe that a majority of military/law enforcement would enforce such laws. In the places that they would (NY with the NYPD comes to mind) there are few guns to grab. Speaking from personal experience, few Marines would exercise such an order.

    But to paraphrase, “the cost of freedom is neverending vigilance” so we must remain vigilant as this threat will not recede. But we should also not overstate the danger, or descend into demagoguery.

  10. On January 3, 2013 at 11:28 pm, Herschel Smith said:

    Thanks for visiting my web site. I agree on every account. My son, a former Marine with a CAR from Iraq, most certainly would not enforce such an order. Besides, it would be contrary to Posse Comitatus.

    I also believe, like you, that the ban will not pass Congress. But it will be a while before the attempt subsides.

  11. On January 7, 2013 at 10:59 am, Joe Mama said:

    “The federal government may regulate interstate commerce, but South Carolina gun manufacturers should be able to skirt federal laws and make and sell whatever they like within the state since their guns, gun parts, and accessories would not cross state lines.”

    Oh, the .gov will say “a SC residents purchase of a SC weapon means they won’t buy a non-SC weapon therefore it affect intersate commerce”. See Wickard v. Filburn and Gonzales v. Raich. We are screwed.

  12. On January 7, 2013 at 11:10 am, Herschel Smith said:

    Joe, you miss the point. In the atmosphere I am discussing, it won’t matter what the feds say or do. If something like this comes to pass, it will be enforced by the power of the state police, local LEOs and even N.G. if necessary.

    There are states (Texas, perhaps S.C.) that will make it a crime to enforce federal laws inside the state, whether Obamacare, new gun control measures, or whatever. When enough federal agents go to state penitentiary for an extended stay, those prisons protected by N.G. troops, the feds will reconsider how they proceed.

  13. On January 7, 2013 at 6:42 pm, Jim Harris said:

    @ last H. Smith: The Feds may or may not “reconsider…” Unfortunately, there is precedent for the NG, while on state duty, being nationalized and immediately (according to the law) becoming federal troops under federal authority.

    Whether or not the historical example should or should not have happened (G. Wallace at the “school house door”) is another discussion — and most of us would probably side with Pres. Eisenhower.

    BUT — it set (or reset) a precedent where NG leaders (as well as other military) will have to decide whose orders to follow. It potentially sets a scenario for civil war — where an armed populace may tip the balance one way or the other (as it did in the Revolution, as well as other conflicts).

    The great irony here: Those against guns may arm themselves with guns to engage in a war against guns!!! Go figure!!!!

  14. On January 8, 2013 at 8:05 pm, Cassandra (of Troy) said:

    Remember the urban trainig exercises that’ve been going on for 2-3 years, then factor in the massive transfer of serious milgear (up to/including armored vehicles & M2HBs) to LE, the rapidly expanding use of drones far from the U.S./Mex border & the openly discussed arming of same, the manufacture/prepositioning of armored checkpoint buildings, the purchase orders for major hot war amounts of pistol/rifle/shotgun/MG ammo, & the (AFAIK) historical fact that NO LE/mil org has en masse refused to obey an order to go after the citizenry, then tell me how much confidence should be placed in the belief that LE & mil forces would support a revolt against the Imperium.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

You are currently reading "There Will Be Resistance", entry #9615 on The Captain's Journal.

This article is filed under the category(s) Obama Administration,Second Amendment and was published December 30th, 2012 by Herschel Smith.

If you're interested in what else the The Captain's Journal has to say, you might try thumbing through the archives and visiting the main index, or; perhaps you would like to learn more about TCJ.

26th MEU (10)
Abu Muqawama (12)
ACOG (2)
ACOGs (1)
Afghan National Army (36)
Afghan National Police (17)
Afghanistan (704)
Afghanistan SOFA (4)
Agriculture in COIN (3)
AGW (1)
Air Force (40)
Air Power (10)
al Qaeda (83)
Ali al-Sistani (1)
America (22)
Ammunition (277)
Animals (292)
Ansar al Sunna (15)
Anthropology (3)
Antonin Scalia (1)
AR-15s (373)
Arghandab River Valley (1)
Arlington Cemetery (2)
Army (86)
Assassinations (2)
Assault Weapon Ban (29)
Australian Army (7)
Azerbaijan (4)
Backpacking (3)
Badr Organization (8)
Baitullah Mehsud (21)
Basra (17)
BATFE (221)
Battle of Bari Alai (2)
Battle of Wanat (18)
Battle Space Weight (3)
Bin Laden (7)
Blogroll (3)
Blogs (24)
Body Armor (23)
Books (3)
Border War (18)
Brady Campaign (1)
Britain (38)
British Army (35)
Camping (5)
Canada (17)
Castle Doctrine (1)
Caucasus (6)
Center For a New American Security (8)
Charity (3)
China (16)
Christmas (16)
CIA (30)
Civilian National Security Force (3)
Col. Gian Gentile (9)
Combat Outposts (3)
Combat Video (2)
Concerned Citizens (6)
Constabulary Actions (3)
Coolness Factor (3)
COP Keating (4)
Corruption in COIN (4)
Council on Foreign Relations (1)
Counterinsurgency (218)
DADT (2)
David Rohde (1)
Defense Contractors (2)
Department of Defense (210)
Department of Homeland Security (26)
Disaster Preparedness (5)
Distributed Operations (5)
Dogs (15)
Donald Trump (27)
Drone Campaign (4)
EFV (3)
Egypt (12)
El Salvador (1)
Embassy Security (1)
Enemy Spotters (1)
Expeditionary Warfare (17)
F-22 (2)
F-35 (1)
Fallujah (17)
Far East (3)
Fathers and Sons (2)
Favorite (1)
Fazlullah (3)
FBI (39)
Featured (189)
Federal Firearms Laws (18)
Financing the Taliban (2)
Firearms (1,777)
Football (1)
Force Projection (35)
Force Protection (4)
Force Transformation (1)
Foreign Policy (27)
Fukushima Reactor Accident (6)
Ganjgal (1)
Garmsir (1)
general (15)
General Amos (1)
General James Mattis (1)
General McChrystal (44)
General McKiernan (6)
General Rodriguez (3)
General Suleimani (9)
Georgia (19)
Google (1)
Gulbuddin Hekmatyar (1)
Gun Control (1,650)
Guns (2,317)
Guns In National Parks (3)
Haditha Roundup (10)
Haiti (2)
Haqqani Network (9)
Hate Mail (8)
Hekmatyar (1)
Heroism (5)
Hezbollah (12)
High Capacity Magazines (16)
High Value Targets (9)
Homecoming (1)
Homeland Security (3)
Horses (2)
Humor (72)
Hunting (34)
ICOS (1)
IEDs (7)
Immigration (108)
India (10)
Infantry (4)
Information Warfare (4)
Infrastructure (4)
Intelligence (23)
Intelligence Bulletin (6)
Iran (171)
Iraq (379)
Iraq SOFA (23)
Islamic Facism (64)
Islamists (98)
Israel (19)
Jaish al Mahdi (21)
Jalalabad (1)
Japan (3)
Jihadists (81)
John Nagl (5)
Joint Intelligence Centers (1)
JRTN (1)
Kabul (1)
Kajaki Dam (1)
Kamdesh (9)
Kandahar (12)
Karachi (7)
Kashmir (2)
Khost Province (1)
Khyber (11)
Knife Blogging (7)
Korea (4)
Korengal Valley (3)
Kunar Province (20)
Kurdistan (3)
Language in COIN (5)
Language in Statecraft (1)
Language Interpreters (2)
Lashkar-e-Taiba (2)
Law Enforcement (6)
Lawfare (14)
Leadership (6)
Lebanon (6)
Leon Panetta (2)
Let Them Fight (2)
Libya (14)
Lines of Effort (3)
Littoral Combat (8)
Logistics (50)
Long Guns (1)
Lt. Col. Allen West (2)
Marine Corps (280)
Marines in Bakwa (1)
Marines in Helmand (67)
Marjah (4)
Media (68)
Medical (146)
Memorial Day (6)
Mexican Cartels (41)
Mexico (61)
Michael Yon (6)
Micromanaging the Military (7)
Middle East (1)
Military Blogging (26)
Military Contractors (5)
Military Equipment (25)
Militia (9)
Mitt Romney (3)
Monetary Policy (1)
Moqtada al Sadr (2)
Mosul (4)
Mountains (25)
MRAPs (1)
Mullah Baradar (1)
Mullah Fazlullah (1)
Mullah Omar (3)
Musa Qala (4)
Music (25)
Muslim Brotherhood (6)
Nation Building (2)
National Internet IDs (1)
National Rifle Association (95)
NATO (15)
Navy (30)
Navy Corpsman (1)
NCOs (3)
News (1)
NGOs (3)
Nicholas Schmidle (2)
Now Zad (19)
NSA (3)
NSA James L. Jones (6)
Nuclear (62)
Nuristan (8)
Obama Administration (221)
Offshore Balancing (1)
Operation Alljah (7)
Operation Khanjar (14)
Ossetia (7)
Pakistan (165)
Paktya Province (1)
Palestine (5)
Patriotism (7)
Patrolling (1)
Pech River Valley (11)
Personal (73)
Petraeus (14)
Pictures (1)
Piracy (13)
Pistol (4)
Pizzagate (21)
Police (652)
Police in COIN (3)
Policy (15)
Politics (973)
Poppy (2)
PPEs (1)
Prisons in Counterinsurgency (12)
Project Gunrunner (20)
PRTs (1)
Qatar (1)
Quadrennial Defense Review (2)
Quds Force (13)
Quetta Shura (1)
RAND (3)
Recommended Reading (14)
Refueling Tanker (1)
Religion (493)
Religion and Insurgency (19)
Reuters (1)
Rick Perry (4)
Rifles (1)
Roads (4)
Rolling Stone (1)
Ron Paul (1)
ROTC (1)
Rules of Engagement (75)
Rumsfeld (1)
Russia (37)
Sabbatical (1)
Sangin (1)
Saqlawiyah (1)
Satellite Patrols (2)
Saudi Arabia (4)
Scenes from Iraq (1)
Second Amendment (673)
Second Amendment Quick Hits (2)
Secretary Gates (9)
Sharia Law (3)
Shura Ittehad-ul-Mujahiden (1)
SIIC (2)
Sirajuddin Haqqani (1)
Small Wars (72)
Snipers (9)
Sniveling Lackeys (2)
Soft Power (4)
Somalia (8)
Sons of Afghanistan (1)
Sons of Iraq (2)
Special Forces (28)
Squad Rushes (1)
State Department (23)
Statistics (1)
Sunni Insurgency (10)
Support to Infantry Ratio (1)
Supreme Court (56)
Survival (185)
SWAT Raids (57)
Syria (38)
Tactical Drills (38)
Tactical Gear (14)
Taliban (168)
Taliban Massing of Forces (4)
Tarmiyah (1)
TBI (1)
Technology (21)
Tehrik-i-Taliban (78)
Terrain in Combat (1)
Terrorism (96)
Thanksgiving (13)
The Anbar Narrative (23)
The Art of War (5)
The Fallen (1)
The Long War (20)
The Surge (3)
The Wounded (13)
Thomas Barnett (1)
Transnational Insurgencies (5)
Tribes (5)
TSA (25)
TSA Ineptitude (14)
TTPs (4)
U.S. Border Patrol (6)
U.S. Border Security (19)
U.S. Sovereignty (24)
UAVs (2)
UBL (4)
Ukraine (10)
Uncategorized (98)
Universal Background Check (3)
Unrestricted Warfare (4)
USS Iwo Jima (2)
USS San Antonio (1)
Uzbekistan (1)
V-22 Osprey (4)
Veterans (3)
Vietnam (1)
War & Warfare (413)
War & Warfare (41)
War Movies (4)
War Reporting (21)
Wardak Province (1)
Warriors (6)
Waziristan (1)
Weapons and Tactics (79)
West Point (1)
Winter Operations (1)
Women in Combat (21)
WTF? (1)
Yemen (1)

June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006

about · archives · contact · register

Copyright © 2006-2024 Captain's Journal. All rights reserved.