Presidential Apologies: A Contrast in Religious Sensitivities

BY Glen Tschirgi
12 years ago

There is something strange about the uproar over the apparently accidental burning of Korans at Bagram Air Base in Afghanistan.

This article from the Associated Press is headlined for Newt Gingrich’s criticism of President Obama’s apologies to Hamid Karzai over the Koran burnings.   Whether you agree or disagree with Gingrich’s points, the defense offered up by White House is thought-provoking:

Even before Gingrich’s comments, White House spokesman Jay Carney sought to counter any criticism of the president’s apology.

“It is wholly appropriate, given the sensitivities to this issue, the understandable sensitivities,” Carney told reporters traveling to Miami with the president on Air Force One. “His primary concern as commander in chief is the safety of the American men and women in Afghanistan, of our military and civilian personnel there. And it was absolutely the right thing to do.”

There are at least two, underlying assumptions in the White House messaging on this.

Muslim Sensitivities

First, Obama’s apology to Karzai was “wholly appropriate” due to “the understandable sensitivities” of the Afghanis.   Presumably Carney is really referring to the Afghani’s muslim sensitivities.   In Obama’s view, then, Islamic “sensitivities” are to be given such respect that any offense– even an indisputably unintentional and accidental one– demands contrition and a grave apology from a United States President.

What is this sensitivity that requires an American President to bend the knee and humbly seek forgiveness?  It is the apparent veneration of a book by muslims that forbids any act of disrespect or dishonor.   This is medieval thinking and, while we can comprehend that Afghanis inhabit a culture and religion that is largely mired in the 7th Century, it is not incumbent on Americans or America’s President to cater to or endorse such magical thinking.

We feel no need, for instance, to apologize to muslims for the dogs that American soldiers often use for bomb detection or even companionship on bases in Afghanistan despite the fact that dogs offend many muslims’ “sensitivities.”    Admittedly, there is no need to go out of our way to unnecessarily offend, but it would seem that we give validity to magical thinking when we apologize for inadvertent offenses to that thinking to which we, ourselves do not subscribe and even hold, privately, in contempt.

Note, too, the contrast in the way Obama treats Islamic beliefs about a book and his treatment of the Roman Catholic beliefs about contraception.  He is frankly not concerned about the Catholic sensitivities when it conflicts with his agenda and, most disturbing, is willing to ride roughshod over important First Amendment rights in the process.

Rewarding Violence

The second rationale provided by the White House is that the apology emanated from the need to protect our military forces in Afghanistan (and probably elsewhere in the Middle East).  The underlying assumption is that muslims will resort to random and not-so-random violence against Americans if they are not placated and appeased.

Comparing the treatment accorded the Afghan government and the Roman Catholic Church, the lesson here seems to be that if you are a religious group that respects the law and addresses its grievances through debate and political action, then your sensitivities– even ones protected by the First Amendment to the Constitution— can be abused and violated by Obama and his myrmidons on the Left.   But if you happen to belong to a religious group that will readily and predictably resort to violence at any unintentional or even accidental slight to your sensitivities, then you are pursued like a wounded child, begged for forgiveness and placated.

This incident should be yet another clear marker for all of us that the West, so far, is on the losing side of the war with Militant Islam as we are willing cede our own cultural beliefs to them simply because they readily resort to violence.    This is like parents who defer and pander to their 17 year-old because they fear his violent temper and unpredictable tendency to violence.   Such a scenario never ends well.

It will not end well for America, either, if we persist in these behaviors.

UPDATE: An interesting contrast to the U.S. position on the accidental burning of the Koran and the intentional burning of the Bible by U.S. forces in 2009.   I do not subscribe to the notion that the Bible– as a collection of paper and ink bound with a cover of some sort is invested with mystical qualities that render the book itself as inviolate.   To do so would be to engage in the same sort of magical thinking that muslims have toward the Koran.   At the same time, the article makes good points about the perception of Afghans who see Americans falling over themselves to seek forgiveness for a few, mistakenly burned Korans while holding their own sacred book, the Bible, in apparent contempt.

Trackbacks & Pingbacks


Comments

  1. On February 24, 2012 at 11:05 am, Rich Buckley said:

    Diplomacy can always find ways of speaking meaningfully. How much more meaningful would it be, diplomatically, to have one of our high ranking, in country, male Generals marry a beautiful, nationally popular Afghanistan female movie star or entertainment personality? Such an act would overpower all petty conflations by opposition. Love has its own power….. just saying.

    Alexander The Great understood the art of diplomacy. There’s a whole other way to think about it.

  2. On February 24, 2012 at 11:22 am, TS Alfabet said:

    Maybe that’s the problem: to Afghanis who live in the 7th Century, such tribal marriage arrangements might make sense and have their effect. To 21st Century Americans, not so much. Not sure that such policy would be, in the end, effective or indeed not counterproductive.

  3. On February 24, 2012 at 1:21 pm, Jo Anne Moore said:

    The comparisons regarding Catholicism and particularly health care are specious in nature. At the heart of the contraception issue is the fundamental right of women to have access to birth control- no matter who their employer is. The Catholic Church, in addition to being a religious institution, is and has been for centuries a large and successful business conglomerate, enjoying many advantages that other businesses do not have. By cloaking women’s health issues in religious dogma, the Catholic Church continues to marginalize, even victimize women much the same as their fundamentalist Muslim brethren.

    I applaud the good works of the many arms of Catholic charities. I applaud the education I received at a Catholic University. But the Catholic Church’s intransigent and medieval stance on contraception and women’s health should not and cannot be allowed to continue in this country under the color of exemption from laws enacted to protect all. No employer should be allowed to exempt a class of employee from obtaining any medical care. Their health care plan covers Viagra for men but not hormone therapy for women and this is not oppressing women?

    As “leader of the free world” and more importantly, the face of America, it was entirely appropriate for President Obama to apologize for offending someone, whether or not they are Muslim. I would hope that an apology would be offered to England if our troops publicly (in jest or otherwise) mooned Queen Elizabeth.

    The knee jerk justifications of the apology may have been ill thought—for that I blame current political processes in this country. Further, the statement regarding the “ceding our own cultural beliefs to others because they resort to violence” is troubling. With that sentence, you are reducing the entire Afghan/Iraq conflict to a religious/culture war. It is not. We are not over there to bring Christian values to Muslim nations; further the vast majority of Muslims are not violent extremists. We are trying to bring peace to a region being preyed upon by violent extremists who brutalize women and others, who traffic in illegal drugs, and who oppress the citizenry while enriching themselves. At least I hope that is what we are doing over there. Otherwise we are just a nosy, noisy bully poking our nose where it isn’t needed or wanted.

  4. On February 24, 2012 at 2:40 pm, Herschel Smith said:

    So, Rich. Which general are you volunteering to be “unequally yoked” to a Muslim woman in Afghanistan? Be specific and give us a name. Have you passed this through him? Does he approve? Also, what, specifically, do you think that something like that will accomplish?

  5. On February 24, 2012 at 3:54 pm, Jim Harris said:

    On above posts: Lord, have Mercy!!!

  6. On February 24, 2012 at 4:05 pm, Herschel Smith said:

    Jo Anne,

    I assume that by “birth control” you mean abortifacients. You could clarify that, but either way, you have called this a “fundamental right.”

    So tell me Jo Anne. Where does this fundamental right come from? What is its source? I could, for example, claim that I have a fundamental right to swat everyone named David over the head every other Tuesday, but some might think that a strange thing if in fact I don’t cite my source for this “fundamental right.” Rights come from outside ourselves. They are deontological in nature, which is why I go to my ultimate source, the Scriptures.

    And your source?

  7. On February 24, 2012 at 4:26 pm, Rich Buckley said:

    “So, Rich. Which general are you volunteering….” the unmarried one who’s always felt he was a reincarnated warrior soul …. like Patton. The bigger concern is “which woman” carries a national image.

  8. On February 24, 2012 at 4:29 pm, Herschel Smith said:

    Did you talk to this particular general to get his approval for your having volunteered him to be unequally yoked to a Muslim woman? What was his name, again? I didn’t catch it.

  9. On February 24, 2012 at 11:52 pm, jbrookins said:

    Jo Anne, I’ve been to Afghanistan a couple of times now and I find your charactorization of the Afghan people very inaccurate. It is the line that many wish to believe yet isn’t true.

    “We are trying to bring peace to a region being preyed upon by violent extremists who brutalize women and others, who traffic in illegal drugs, and who oppress the citizenry while enriching themselves.”

    Please tell what we have done to stop the brutalization of women. We certainly didn’t get an Afghan Constitution that would stop this, Illegal drugs are still going strong and the citizenry are still used and abused buy the current political system.

    There was and is no need for an apology from the US period.

  10. On February 25, 2012 at 12:04 pm, Rich Buckley said:

    Good Herschel, I can’t speak for your refined sense of “yoking index” of womanhood, but I doubt we would have too hard an assignment to find a high ranking red blooded US General that found the feminine features and virtues of, say, Miss Vida Samadzai of Afghanistan a mission too difficult to explore. I could be wrong. It might take me a whole week instead of the 2-minutes I would estimate.

  11. On February 25, 2012 at 12:14 pm, Herschel Smith said:

    It has nothing whatsoever to do with a refined sense, Rich. It has to do with unequal pairing (or coupling) of religions (2 Cor 6:14). Go back and read some. This is basic, Sunday school children level stuff sir. Simple and basic. Far below adult level understanding of things.

    And I am still waiting for that name. And what you think this will accomplish.

  12. On February 25, 2012 at 7:17 pm, Rich Buckley said:

    I yield to your consummated Seminary training as a reliable fount of wisdom.  “Both read the Bible day and night, but thou read black where I read white,” William Blake. While the wisdom of 2 Cor 6:14 holds true, love in all its many dimensions has its own power to forge the very religious equivalency of good service and spiritual union.

    Our personal comfort zones on the power of love and its resonance in the practice of two main stream religions, Christianity and Islam, may forge your yoke, it shall not forge mine.

    As for the vetting of a general’s name, we will offer permanent Hazard Duty Pay in service to God and Country.      

  13. On February 25, 2012 at 7:24 pm, Rich Buckley said:

    What it will accomplish.

    It will speak in a language of the heart the human psyche understands even as many egos will not. That the does not have to exist a religiously maintained wall among people. It speaks where foreign policy and diplomacy fails us.

  14. On February 26, 2012 at 8:44 am, Šťoural said:

    USA-strongest nation in the World:

    U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta called on the Afghan government on Saturday to take decisive action to protect NATO forces and curtail violence sweeping the country, after two American military officers were shot dead inside Afghanistan’s interior ministry.

    http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/02/25/us-afghanistan-shootings-pentagon-idUSTRE81O0M720120225

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment


You are currently reading "Presidential Apologies: A Contrast in Religious Sensitivities", entry #8282 on The Captain's Journal.

This article is filed under the category(s) Afghanistan,Policy,Religion,The Long War and was published February 24th, 2012 by Glen Tschirgi.

If you're interested in what else the The Captain's Journal has to say, you might try thumbing through the archives and visiting the main index, or; perhaps you would like to learn more about TCJ.

26th MEU (10)
Abu Muqawama (12)
ACOG (2)
ACOGs (1)
Afghan National Army (36)
Afghan National Police (17)
Afghanistan (704)
Afghanistan SOFA (4)
Agriculture in COIN (3)
AGW (1)
Air Force (40)
Air Power (10)
al Qaeda (83)
Ali al-Sistani (1)
America (22)
Ammunition (275)
Animals (280)
Ansar al Sunna (15)
Anthropology (3)
Antonin Scalia (1)
AR-15s (372)
Arghandab River Valley (1)
Arlington Cemetery (2)
Army (86)
Assassinations (2)
Assault Weapon Ban (28)
Australian Army (7)
Azerbaijan (4)
Backpacking (2)
Badr Organization (8)
Baitullah Mehsud (21)
Basra (17)
BATFE (217)
Battle of Bari Alai (2)
Battle of Wanat (18)
Battle Space Weight (3)
Bin Laden (7)
Blogroll (3)
Blogs (24)
Body Armor (23)
Books (3)
Border War (18)
Brady Campaign (1)
Britain (38)
British Army (35)
Camping (5)
Canada (17)
Castle Doctrine (1)
Caucasus (6)
CENTCOM (7)
Center For a New American Security (8)
Charity (3)
China (16)
Christmas (16)
CIA (30)
Civilian National Security Force (3)
Col. Gian Gentile (9)
Combat Outposts (3)
Combat Video (2)
Concerned Citizens (6)
Constabulary Actions (3)
Coolness Factor (3)
COP Keating (4)
Corruption in COIN (4)
Council on Foreign Relations (1)
Counterinsurgency (218)
DADT (2)
David Rohde (1)
Defense Contractors (2)
Department of Defense (210)
Department of Homeland Security (26)
Disaster Preparedness (5)
Distributed Operations (5)
Dogs (15)
Donald Trump (27)
Drone Campaign (4)
EFV (3)
Egypt (12)
El Salvador (1)
Embassy Security (1)
Enemy Spotters (1)
Expeditionary Warfare (17)
F-22 (2)
F-35 (1)
Fallujah (17)
Far East (3)
Fathers and Sons (2)
Favorite (1)
Fazlullah (3)
FBI (39)
Featured (189)
Federal Firearms Laws (18)
Financing the Taliban (2)
Firearms (1,758)
Football (1)
Force Projection (35)
Force Protection (4)
Force Transformation (1)
Foreign Policy (27)
Fukushima Reactor Accident (6)
Ganjgal (1)
Garmsir (1)
general (15)
General Amos (1)
General James Mattis (1)
General McChrystal (44)
General McKiernan (6)
General Rodriguez (3)
General Suleimani (9)
Georgia (19)
GITMO (2)
Google (1)
Gulbuddin Hekmatyar (1)
Gun Control (1,630)
Guns (2,298)
Guns In National Parks (3)
Haditha Roundup (10)
Haiti (2)
HAMAS (7)
Haqqani Network (9)
Hate Mail (8)
Hekmatyar (1)
Heroism (4)
Hezbollah (12)
High Capacity Magazines (16)
High Value Targets (9)
Homecoming (1)
Homeland Security (3)
Horses (2)
Humor (72)
Hunting (31)
ICOS (1)
IEDs (7)
Immigration (104)
India (10)
Infantry (4)
Information Warfare (4)
Infrastructure (4)
Intelligence (23)
Intelligence Bulletin (6)
Iran (171)
Iraq (379)
Iraq SOFA (23)
Islamic Facism (64)
Islamists (98)
Israel (19)
Jaish al Mahdi (21)
Jalalabad (1)
Japan (3)
Jihadists (81)
John Nagl (5)
Joint Intelligence Centers (1)
JRTN (1)
Kabul (1)
Kajaki Dam (1)
Kamdesh (9)
Kandahar (12)
Karachi (7)
Kashmir (2)
Khost Province (1)
Khyber (11)
Knife Blogging (7)
Korea (4)
Korengal Valley (3)
Kunar Province (20)
Kurdistan (3)
Language in COIN (5)
Language in Statecraft (1)
Language Interpreters (2)
Lashkar-e-Taiba (2)
Law Enforcement (6)
Lawfare (14)
Leadership (6)
Lebanon (6)
Leon Panetta (2)
Let Them Fight (2)
Libya (14)
Lines of Effort (3)
Littoral Combat (8)
Logistics (50)
Long Guns (1)
Lt. Col. Allen West (2)
Marine Corps (280)
Marines in Bakwa (1)
Marines in Helmand (67)
Marjah (4)
MEDEVAC (2)
Media (67)
Medical (146)
Memorial Day (6)
Mexican Cartels (41)
Mexico (61)
Michael Yon (6)
Micromanaging the Military (7)
Middle East (1)
Military Blogging (26)
Military Contractors (5)
Military Equipment (25)
Militia (9)
Mitt Romney (3)
Monetary Policy (1)
Moqtada al Sadr (2)
Mosul (4)
Mountains (25)
MRAPs (1)
Mullah Baradar (1)
Mullah Fazlullah (1)
Mullah Omar (3)
Musa Qala (4)
Music (25)
Muslim Brotherhood (6)
Nation Building (2)
National Internet IDs (1)
National Rifle Association (95)
NATO (15)
Navy (30)
Navy Corpsman (1)
NCOs (3)
News (1)
NGOs (3)
Nicholas Schmidle (2)
Now Zad (19)
NSA (3)
NSA James L. Jones (6)
Nuclear (62)
Nuristan (8)
Obama Administration (221)
Offshore Balancing (1)
Operation Alljah (7)
Operation Khanjar (14)
Ossetia (7)
Pakistan (165)
Paktya Province (1)
Palestine (5)
Patriotism (7)
Patrolling (1)
Pech River Valley (11)
Personal (72)
Petraeus (14)
Pictures (1)
Piracy (13)
Pistol (4)
Pizzagate (21)
Police (647)
Police in COIN (3)
Policy (15)
Politics (969)
Poppy (2)
PPEs (1)
Prisons in Counterinsurgency (12)
Project Gunrunner (20)
PRTs (1)
Qatar (1)
Quadrennial Defense Review (2)
Quds Force (13)
Quetta Shura (1)
RAND (3)
Recommended Reading (14)
Refueling Tanker (1)
Religion (491)
Religion and Insurgency (19)
Reuters (1)
Rick Perry (4)
Rifles (1)
Roads (4)
Rolling Stone (1)
Ron Paul (1)
ROTC (1)
Rules of Engagement (75)
Rumsfeld (1)
Russia (37)
Sabbatical (1)
Sangin (1)
Saqlawiyah (1)
Satellite Patrols (2)
Saudi Arabia (4)
Scenes from Iraq (1)
Second Amendment (667)
Second Amendment Quick Hits (2)
Secretary Gates (9)
Sharia Law (3)
Shura Ittehad-ul-Mujahiden (1)
SIIC (2)
Sirajuddin Haqqani (1)
Small Wars (72)
Snipers (9)
Sniveling Lackeys (2)
Soft Power (4)
Somalia (8)
Sons of Afghanistan (1)
Sons of Iraq (2)
Special Forces (28)
Squad Rushes (1)
State Department (23)
Statistics (1)
Sunni Insurgency (10)
Support to Infantry Ratio (1)
Supreme Court (52)
Survival (185)
SWAT Raids (57)
Syria (38)
Tactical Drills (38)
Tactical Gear (14)
Taliban (168)
Taliban Massing of Forces (4)
Tarmiyah (1)
TBI (1)
Technology (21)
Tehrik-i-Taliban (78)
Terrain in Combat (1)
Terrorism (96)
Thanksgiving (13)
The Anbar Narrative (23)
The Art of War (5)
The Fallen (1)
The Long War (20)
The Surge (3)
The Wounded (13)
Thomas Barnett (1)
Transnational Insurgencies (5)
Tribes (5)
TSA (24)
TSA Ineptitude (13)
TTPs (4)
U.S. Border Patrol (6)
U.S. Border Security (18)
U.S. Sovereignty (23)
UAVs (2)
UBL (4)
Ukraine (10)
Uncategorized (98)
Universal Background Check (3)
Unrestricted Warfare (4)
USS Iwo Jima (2)
USS San Antonio (1)
Uzbekistan (1)
V-22 Osprey (4)
Veterans (3)
Vietnam (1)
War & Warfare (412)
War & Warfare (41)
War Movies (4)
War Reporting (21)
Wardak Province (1)
Warriors (6)
Waziristan (1)
Weapons and Tactics (79)
West Point (1)
Winter Operations (1)
Women in Combat (21)
WTF? (1)
Yemen (1)

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006

about · archives · contact · register

Copyright © 2006-2024 Captain's Journal. All rights reserved.