4 years, 1 month ago
It is important to recall the incident in the Kunar Province of Afghanistan that occurred approximately five months ago in which three Marines and one Navy Corpsman were killed in an Ambush. They twice requested air support and artillery, only to be twice denied it from hundreds of miles away because noncombatants may have been in the area.
Taking a slight detour back to General McChrystal’s tactical directive, the new rules place a premium on protection of the population, even to the extent of backing away from fire fights if it is possible that noncombatants will be involved. In McChrystal’s own words, “If you are in a situation where you are under fire from the enemy… if there is any chance of creating civilian casualties or if you don’t know whether you will create civilian casualties, if you can withdraw from that situation without firing, then you must do so.”
I later predicted as a result of the investigation conducted as part of the follow-on to this incident:
… here is something that has no chance of happening. No investigation will find that a tactical directive written or endorsed by a four star general was responsible for anything bad. The directive will be exonerated and the field grade officers responsible for denying artillery had better begin looking for another line of work.
Doing daily searches of ROE, the Kunar Province and other specific keywords it has taken a while to find anything related to this incident. I have spoken with the McClatchy reporter who covered this incident, Jonathan Landay, and we have both been waiting for release of the investigation (AR 15-6). As a related issue, I had also stated that I got independent confirmation of the truthfulness of Landay’s report. The Washington Post has given us the first (and maybe only) look into the findings.
In the third incident that has resulted in a reprimand, four Marines were killed near the eastern Afghanistan village of Ganjgal when they were ambushed on their way to a meeting with local villagers. Senior Marine officials alleged that the Army battalion in the area was slow to provide artillery support to ward off the attack. After an investigation, the battalion executive officer, who was the senior officer on duty at the time, received a letter of reprimand, Army officials said.
The next promotion board will not go well for this field grade officer, and probably the next, and the next. His career in the Army is essentially over – just as I predicted. But he was following the spirit (and even the letter) of McChrystal’s rules. Remember that my objection to the tactical directive isn’t that there is a proviso for protection of noncombatants. No Marine or Soldier wants to kill noncombatants. That isn’t what he’s trained to do.
My objection goes to the notion that a four star general is in any position to write an authoritative tactical directive for Lance Corporals and Sergeants in the field under fire, thus removing their judgment from consideration. It is the ultimate “I don’t trust you” insult, and it kills troops. “I support the troops” isn’t just a lie for the Daily Kos folks. It’s the ugly secret for some flag officers.
And you heard the prediction here first. Here is another prediction. We won’t see the release of the full AR 15-6 investigation so that we can learn the full truth about the failures that fateful day which killed three Marines and a Navy Corpsman.
Rules of Engagement category