As he attempts to back up and drive around the golf car blocking the parking lot exist, the school resource officer issues a foul-mouthed warning: ‘You’re gonna get shot, you come another f***ing foot closer to me. You run into me, you’ll get f***ing shot. This is my campus, brother.’
The lesson here isn’t really that many cops are thugs and gang members with badges and court authority who will use any chance to berate, belittle, and lord it over other people like the sociopaths they are. We knew that already.
The real lesson here is that when you send your children to centers of communist indoctrination, the state owns them. The only solution is home schooling.
FRESNO, Calif. (KFSN) — A frightening situation for a Tulare County family started when they heard banging on their front door at around ten Tuesday night.
“They can hear them yelling ‘Sheriff’s Office, Sheriff’s Office,’ says Tulare County Sheriff’s Lt. Joe Torres. “The victims thought it was odd that it was late hours, so the suspects then forced their way into the living room area, they busted the front door.”
At this point, Torres says the homeowner knew for sure that the people at the door were not sheriff’s deputies, as they weren’t wearing law enforcement uniforms.
That’s when Torres says the homeowner and suspects started shooting at each other.
One suspect was hit in the upper body and died at the scene. The other suspects got away.
The homeowner’s wife, child, and another man were inside the house at the time. Thankfully, nobody was hurt.
I’ve documented two other times this has happened, once in Norfolk, Virginia, and the other time in Houston, Texas. There are doubtless many more examples I haven’t documented. I have observed that “You see, we can’t just lay down and let people screaming “police, police, get on the floor, police, police” … come into our homes without countering those efforts with close quarters battle. Because they may not be police.”
So two sides are now set up to conduct war on one another, the first side being the police who conduct SWAT raids with impunity from prosecution by the government, the second side being the innocent homeowner, victim of a false claim or mistaken identity, and the setup was built by the government itself who refuses to stand down their stupid “war on drugs” and simply follow the constitution.
This is a remarkable video for a number of reasons.
First of all, the cop who conducted the detention is a vile, foul-mouth, nasty, mean individual, who clearly hasn’t the temperament, education or intelligence to be a cop. In my estimation he has the temperament to be a ditch digger, and probably nothing more until he grows up.
But it shouldn’t even have to get that far. West Virginia is not a stop-and-identify state based on every resource I could find on the subject (not that I believe stop-and-identify is constitutional, but it seems to be recognized by the courts in the case of a “Terry Stop” where there is legitimate suspicion of a crime). So the cop broke West Virginia state law. He no more has the right to stop someone and force them to answer questions or provide identification for no reason than I do.
Third, based on what this cop says, he does this all the time. Seriously. Watch the video. Based on what I heard, I think he confessed over video to multiple violations of constitutional rights of citizens of West Virginia.
Your contact information for this is the following.
sdeweese@putnamwv.org (Steve Deweese, Sheriff of Putnam County)
prosecutingattorney@putnamwv.org (Mark A. Sorsaia,Office of the Prosecuting Attorney
Putnam County Judicial Building)
Oh, and by the way, Putnam County is a so-called “Second Amendment Sanctuary” county. It looks to me like Sheriff Deweese isn’t on board with that and needs to be replaced.
“I have my own army in the NYPD, which is the seventh biggest army in the world. I have my own State Department, much to Foggy Bottom’s annoyance. We have the United Nations in New York, and so we have an entree into the diplomatic world that Washington does not have,” Mayor Bloomberg said.
I’m glad you see it that way Michael. I do too.
Hey, here’s a little note for you. Your army sucks. And the founders disagreed with the notion of standing armies in America.
His weapon was concealed and the only reason the deputy knew he had a weapon was that he informed as such. He was stopped, detained, and a gun pointed at him for wearing a ballistic vest. In other words, he did nothing illegal.
In our discussions about fisking your local Sheriff and his deputies for their views of your rights, especially in the context of working towards constitutional Sheriffs who will prevent agents of the state and federal government from infringing on gun rights, it’s been easy to overlook a very important aspect of your local AO.
In a lot of urban and suburban areas, it’s commonplace to have separated law enforcement duties and authority between the Sheriff and a city or county/city police department. The Sheriff, under this framework, is responsible for serving warrants, security of the court, juries and the jail system. The police department is responsible for law enforcement in all other areas.
The pretext for this separation, which likely happened either from a state referendum or a change to state laws, is that the Sheriff, who is an elected officer, can then use his status to show favoritism to those who donated to his campaign, who are his friends, and family. Conversely, he can punish his enemies.
True enough, this has happened on too many occasions in American history, and where this has been done, the Sheriffs have themselves to blame for it, at least in part. But this also removes the highest elected law enforcement official from public review and voter approval. The other side of the sword cuts deep.
I assumed that this is the way Prince William County law enforcement works, since these are police officers, not deputies.
This is a remarkable video, made even more so by the fact that they knew they were being videoed and were still as abusive as they are. To begin with, photography isn’t a crime, and these officers know it.
They repeatedly make the claim that “we need you … ” normally ending in something like identify yourself. But the fact of the matter is that no one talks the law or rights. They don’t really need anything of the sort, they just want to fill out the right paperwork and put another name on a watch list.
They also repeatedly ask his “intent and purpose” with said videography. Again, that’s not important and isn’t any of their business. They have no constitutional right to know this information. They place this in the category of “suspicious activity,” but suspicious activity isn’t a crime. His detention wasn’t a legal “Terry Stop,” and the police officers greatly add to their problem later in the video.
When he was asked to remove his face cover, the videographer smartly asked them what they would do if he was a Muslim wearing head/face cover and it was his religious beliefs. They clearly state that they wouldn’t be able to force him to obey the order, and this is highly problematic because this means they won’t apply the law equally to everyone. The law is either constitutional or it’s not – regardless of religious views.
They further demand his DOB, which again isn’t based on any real need to know that information outside of putting him on a watch list. Then they ridiculously claim that he’s “disturbing the peace” since everyone is now watching him, that fact being based solely on the fact that the police stopped him. The police were the ones disturbing the peace, not him.
The legal problems this police department presents for itself are overwhelming, and if this individual has the money to pursue it, they are in for a legal fight. Finally, when the individual demands their identification, they claim they are under no obligation to supply that because “we’re law enforcement.”
The arrogance and haughtiness would be staggering if it weren’t for the fact that it is ubiquitous. I almost know what to expect these days when I view these videos.
The contact information for the department is: policedept@pwcgov.org.
The contact information for the chief of police is: bbarnard@pwcgov.org.
This video is long but interesting. Before watching, I have a few points to make to the chief of police in Speedway, Indiana. Yes, I sent you this link, Mr. Campbell.
First, your officers violated the constitution of the United States by detaining him without a crime having been committed. The original phone call didn’t report a crime, and you had no reason to suspect a crime. This wasn’t a “Terry Stop,” and you know it. Check with your DA. He’ll back me up on this.
Second, the officer on the right in the video is much too emotional for my tastes. I don’t think he has the temperament for the job. Additionally, he keeps talking about logic, and I don’t think he understands what he’s talking about. He should take a college course in logic before doing that again. They will explain the rules of classical logic, and how presuppositions and axioms are used to produce conclusions, or in other words, how to properly build syllogisms. The gun carrier you stopped didn’t violate any rules of logic in the video. He didn’t stumble into any formal logical fallacies.
Third, as to the officer on the left who kept talking about what the gun carrier was trying to “prove,” that’s an irrelevant line of questioning and makes no difference. It has nothing to do with anything, certainly not why he was being detained.
Fourth, the sergeant in the video asking the gun carrier to hand over his weapon for examination is the most nonsensical thing I’ve heard today. Any man who touches another man’s gun is an idiot. Any man who asks another man to handle his weapon is risking an ND, and is therefore an idiot. Any man who handles another man’s weapon (in a case like this) is risking an ND, and is therefore an idiot. I couldn’t care less if he is an “armorer” or not. The request was stupid.
Furthermore, the stated excuse for turning over the weapon, “To see if any modifications had been made to it,” was an invasion of his privacy and unrelated to his being detained. Your officers had absolutely no need to see his weapon. And finally, if he had converted his weapon into a fully automatic rifle loaded with AP rounds, less than a 16″ barrel on it, and an illegal can attached, it wouldn’t have stood up in court. I’m not going to waste our time explaining this since it’s all available if you review the Fourth Circuit case of U.S. versus Nathaniel Black (Charlotte Mecklenburg Police Department). Ask your DA. He’ll back me up on this.
HOLLY HILL, Fla. – A bullet struck an apartment of a Holly Hill family getting ready for the day on Wednesday.
The bullet came from the rifle of an officer, according to a police report.
Police said around 6:40 a.m. Wednesday officers responded to the Charleston House Apartments in reference to a suspicious incident.
A renter told officers he believed someone shot into his apartment because of a large hole in the wall and the plaster and wood on the floor, according to police.
Investigators said there was a hole in the wall above a door frame in the northeast bedroom of the apartment.
Two kids were in the bedroom getting ready to go to school, according to the report.
“Yeah, my wife was home. She was up, she was getting our kids ready for school and then like a wall in our apartment exploded,” he told a dispatcher.
The dispatcher asked him why it took an hour to call authorities.
“She just told me. She had to get the kids up and to the school bus before it left and she just got back,” he said.
A Holly Hill officer lives above the apartment and he told police he was attempting to move a rifle, according to the incident report.
He told police he was walking with the rifle and must have had his finger inside the trigger guard, according to investigators.
Investigators said he told police he tripped on something and the rifle discharged.
Police said there aren’t criminal charges and the officer was off duty.
The officer is still on regular patrols, according to police.
The department will do a review of the situation, according to investigators.
Yea, that’s important information for a dispatcher to know: ” … why it took an hour to call authorities.” Not why some dumb ass discharged a round through an apartment wall.
50,000 guns in Richmond, Virginia, not even a single negligent discharge. One cop with a rifle, a hole in a neighbor’s wall
The best part is that “The officer is still on regular patrols.” Well good. We wouldn’t want a cop to go without work, even if he does occasionally kill neighbors by leaving rounds in the chamber, the muzzle pointed in the wrong direction, and the rifle laying where it can be knocked around.
Then again, there’s always the possibility that he didn’t knock it around. Sympathetic muscle reflect might have caused him to pull the trigger when he tripped. In this case, that’s another rule of gun safety he violated.
They’ve bought into the notion of right wing violence. No such thing is going to happen in Richmond. Any violence will be at the hands of Antifa, and drama will be courtesy of crisis actors hired by Soros and Bloomberg.
Ignoramus cop #1 shoots an unarmed, innocent woman, and then tells her “Crawl to me. Crawl to me.” Ignoramus cop #2 and ignoramus cop #1 point pistols at the innocent, unarmed woman while she crawls to them, injured. Ignoramus cop shouts “cuff her.” While cuffed, she is dragged into another room while ignoramus medic puts some gauze on her wounds and tells her to “put pressure on it.” He tells her to put pressure on it.
That about sums it up for me, but the rest of the story is here if you care.
5 years, 4 months ago
