Supreme Court declines to take up three gun ownership cases
The Supreme Court on Monday denied appeals from three people who sought to have their right to own guns reinstated after being convicted of nonviolent crimes, a move that disappointed gun rights advocates.
The denials, which were issued without comment or noted dissent, left intact lower court rulings which found that the lifetime bans did not run afoul of Second Amendment protections.
One case involved a Pennsylvania man who sought to have his right to own a firearm restored after he was subjected to a lifetime ban following a misdemeanor conviction for driving under the influence in 2005.
The other cases involved a Pennsylvania woman convicted of lying on her tax returns and a man convicted of copyright violations and smuggling counterfeit cassette tapes in 1987.
For a case to be heard, or granted a writ of certiorari, at least four justices must vote to take up the case.
How sad. The Supreme Cast Of Clowns couldn’t even find four justices to agree to hear these cases. Thus, they ensured that if these three people, or thousands of people just like them in America, want means of self defense, they must obtain it illegally.
They have ensured the very thing the system claims to want to repair, i.e., that people must become lawbreakers in order to do things usual and typical humans do.
How arbitrary. How cruel. How utterly detestable. How expected and customary from the court.
