Teen Charged with Felony for Killing a Turkey on His Family Property Found Not Guilty
BY Herschel SmithIn May, during Georgia’s spring turkey season, a 16-year-old hunter was charged with a felony for shooting a gobbler on his family’s property that his former high-school teacher claimed was her pet. Although the investigation that prompted the aggravated animal cruelty charge took less than a week, the ensuing legal case dragged on for nearly six months and divided the small-town community of Waverly Hall, where the incident took place.
That all came to a close Tuesday during a trial in juvenile court, where a Harris County judge found the teen hunter not guilty of the felony charge.
Because juvenile cases are sealed in the state of Georgia, Outdoor Life was unable to obtain transcripts of the court proceedings. (OL will continue to keep the minor’s name confidential for this same reason.) The teenager’s family has so far been unwilling to comment on the trial, aside from sharing the judge’s final verdict via text message. The two defense attorneys who represented the teen have also not responded to requests for comment about what transpired Tuesday.
But according to conversations with the teen’s family before the Nov. 4 trial took place, the case against the now 17-year-old hinged around two key questions: whether the turkey killed April 27 on the family’s 11-acre property belonged to the teacher and her husband; and whether the teenager knew it was their pet bird when he pulled the trigger.
In issuing his “not guilty” verdict, the juvenile court judge must have found that there was insufficient evidence to affirmatively answer those two questions, and to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the teen was guilty of a felony, aggravated cruelty to animals. (This is a step up from the misdemeanor charge, cruelty to animals. According to Georgia law, the difference is whether the individual acted with malice.)
So, while the judge’s reasoning might be unclear, his “not guilty” verdict ultimately means that there was doubt in his mind as to whether the teenager knew the bird was his teacher’s pet when he shot it.
The prosecutors and judge are idiots and don’t deserve to flip hamburgers at McDonald’s. It’s a Gobbler. The charge of animal cruelty is ridiculous, and anyone with a lick of sense would know that Gobbler’s aren’t pets. No one has a pet Gobbler. No one.
If this was your pet turkey, prove it. Show me videos of you cuddling with the bird. I dare you.
On November 5, 2025 at 11:41 pm, Dan said:
The person most in need of a neck stretching is the Prosecutor. Without a Prosecutor actively seeking a conviction NONE of the endless litany of cases of malicious prosecution would happen.
On November 6, 2025 at 12:41 am, Steve Miller said:
Neck stretching or manual trachea removal;-)
On November 6, 2025 at 11:27 am, MN Steel said:
I worked out of Waverly Hall for Mead last millenium. I found the small county size in Georgia leaves a lot of county officials go to extreme lengths to make a name for themselves trying to score political name recognition.
The “DUI Checkpoints” run by the massive State Troopers in aviator glasses were a nice touch as well.
Too hot for me down there.
On November 6, 2025 at 1:06 pm, I R A Darth Aggie said:
During turkey season keep your pet turkey in a bird coop. How hard is this?
On November 6, 2025 at 9:10 pm, James Bobby said:
Back in the 80s I had the same situation but with pet mallards on a public lake. The judge said that if the ducks were flying around & coming into decoys they are not pets, case closed.
On November 6, 2025 at 9:25 pm, Ozark Redneck said:
Wild animals should not be pets. We even have this issue around here.
On November 8, 2025 at 3:15 pm, Don Curton said:
Let’s see, keep a pet squirrel named Peanut and some crazy lady will complain and the state will come in and kill your pet.
Shoot a wild turkey on your own property and some crazy lady will complain and the state will try to throw you in jail.
Seems like there’s two problems here, crazy ladies and the state.