Several examples of Christians opposing all violence and means of self defense have been in the news lately, and I can't deal with all such examples. But three particular examples come to mind, and I first want to show you one example from Mr. Robert Schenck in a ridiculously titled article, Christ or a Glock. "Well, first of all you're making an immediate decision that if someone invades your home, they are going to die," Rev. Schenck replied. "So you are ready to kill another human being [read more]
GARLAND (CBSDFW.COM) – Tom Mannewitz has owned the Targetmaster Indoor Shooting Center in Garland since 1979.
He supports open-carry, which lawmakers approved in 2015, allowing people to carry handguns openly just the same as long rifles.
But Mannewitz said he opposes a new bill that would make licensing to carry a handgun, required education classes and fees optional. I understand why people would like to have constitutional carry but I have to say I would vote against it. Not everybody should be carrying a gun. Not everybody has the right to own a gun. If the police have some way of determining are you licensed or not, I think that’s an asset to the law enforcement community,” he said.
We don’t think Texans should have to pay for the right to exercise their 2nd Amendment rights, said the man who filed the legislation, HB 375, Republican State Representative Jonathan Stickland of Bedford.
Stickland said his bill would make the rules for handguns the same as they already are for long rifles.
What my bill is not it is not an expansion of who can carry. Under constitutional carry, anyone who is eligible for a CHL now would be able to carry. No one new would be able to carry.”
He said under his legislation, people would still need to pass a federal background check when buying a firearm. But Mannewitz said he also wants the state to continue doing background checks for those who are carrying guns.
The state license costs $140 for the first time and $70 for renewal every five years after that. Once a gun owner reaches the age of 60, the cost of the license drops to $35.
Stickland though believes the cost of the required license and class can be prohibitive to people with lower incomes. He said some gun shop owners oppose his bill because they may lose a lot of money if the gun safety classes are no longer required.
But Mannewitz said the income he generates from those classes is half of one percent of his gross revenues.
Democratic State Representative Eric Johnson of Dallas strongly disagrees with Stickland’s bill.
I have a real problem with the idea of unlicensed open carry. It’s asking for trouble. It’s just beyond the pale. I have a real problem with open carry in large urban areas like Dallas,” he said.
As a result, Johnson has proposed his own bill, HB 291, that would exempt Dallas from open carry.
As I’ve stated before, the reason to oppose nullification at the local and county level is that little Napoleons like to rule over other people, negating duly enacted laws. To my knowledge, there has never been a time when local or county nullification actually enabled liberties rather than curtailing them. The advocates of exception for Dallas or other cities don’t really believe in pushing authority downward unless is suits their needs at the time.
As to Mr. Mannewitz, you really find out who your friends are when the issue invokes money, yes? And as for the notion that Mr. Mannewitz earns half of one percent of his revenue from these classes, I wish I could believe that, but I doubt it.
There is something more going on, perhaps being a one stop shop and offering up their services to complete paperwork for a fee, or running students past counters full of guns in order to sell them to class participants. Either way, progressives never sleep, and it looks like Texas is in for yet another open carry fight to bring constitutional carry to their state.
I told you this wasn’t the end of it when they passed that ridiculous law allowing permitted open carry. Stay frosty folks. The war isn’t over yet, you’re just in an interlude.