NATO Intransigence in Afghanistan

BY Herschel Smith
4 months, 3 weeks ago

About a week ago we got the message that everything is going just swimmingly in Afghanistan.

Insurgent attacks have tumbled in eastern Afghanistan, notably along the border with Pakistan, in recent months compared to the same period in 2007, a US general said Sunday.

The fall was due to “aggressive operations” by Afghan security forces and their Western allies, as well as improvements in local governance, Brigadier General Joseph Votel told reporters.

The number of attacks so far in February was about 35 percent below that for the same month last year, said Votel, deputy commander of the US-led coalition force that works with a separate NATO-headed deployment.

“Our border attacks and incidents along the border … continues to go downwards. We are probably 40 to 50 percent below what we were a year ago,” he said.

“We attribute this to aggressive operations there that we have been conducting with the police, with the army, assisted by the coalition forces … and the growth of the government in the districts and in the provinces” …

Votel played down talk of an insurgent “spring offensive.”

“I think there is going be an offensive in the spring, the offensive is going to be us, the ANSF (the Afghan National Security Forces),” he said. “The government security forces will lead the operations and we will support.”

Today, reminiscent of our article The Marines, Afghanistan and Strategic Malaise, General McNeill painted a picture of NATO cowardice and intransigence.

Nato’s commander in Afghanistan voiced his “frustration” with the restrictions imposed on the Alliance’s forces yesterday and said these “national caveats” were hindering the fight against the Taliban …

Germany, for example, insists on keeping its 3,200 troops in the relative safety of northern Afghanistan where reconstruction - not combat  is their primary task.

Gen McNeill, an American veteran of the Vietnam war, said these restrictions were “frustrating in how they impinge upon my ability to properly plan, resource and prosecute effective military operations”.

Gen McNeill, 61, added: “It’s hard to mass [troops] when you sometimes have to ask all the way back to governments ‘may I use your force in this location in this manner’?”

As for deploying rapidly, Gen McNeill said: “If we can move faster than our adversary we have an edge over him. If I have to take the time to see who can make this move and who cannot if I request them, it’s hard to avail myself of speed. Therein lies the issue.”

He added: “It requires me to expend energies that without an imposition of such restrictions and constraints, I’d be able to put that energy into things that are far more important.”

Preposterous.  Apparently everything is not going just swimmingly in Afghanistan.  The ghost of General George S. Patton gives NATO a well deserved kick in the ass for their cowardice, along with the U.S. for our stupidity in having the hapless and pitiful NATO involved to begin with.  It’s way past time to remove the adolescents and put the adults in charge.


Comments

  1. On March 5, 2008 at 4:18 pm, mtovet said:

    Can you imagine what would have happened had we had to use NATO forces in Europe against Russian forces? I’ll bet they were quaking in their Cossack boots!

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.


You are currently reading "NATO Intransigence in Afghanistan", entry #980 on The Captain's Journal.

This article is filed under the category(s) Afghanistan, NATO and was published March 3rd, 2008 by Herschel Smith.

If you're interested in what else the The Captain's Journal has to say, you might try thumbing through the archives and visiting the main index, or; perhaps you would like to learn more about TCJ.

26th MEU (1)
Afghanistan (147)
Air Force (19)
Air Power (5)
al Qaeda (54)
Ansar al Sunna (15)
Anthropology (3)
Arlington Cemetery (1)
Army (12)
Badr Organization (8)
Baitullah Mehsud (8)
Basra (12)
Battle of Wanat (1)
Body Armor (7)
Books (1)
Britain (14)
British Army (17)
CENTCOM (3)
Charity (3)
CIA (2)
Combat Video (1)
Concerned Citizens (4)
Constabulary Actions (3)
Counterinsurgency (72)
Department of Defense (63)
Distributed Operations (2)
Dogs (1)
Fallujah (13)
Far East (3)
Favorite (1)
Featured (44)
Force Projection (19)
general (13)
General Suleimani (2)
Haditha Roundup (10)
HAMAS (1)
Hate Mail (7)
Heroism (1)
Hezbollah (5)
Humor (6)
Immigration (15)
Infrastructure (1)
Intelligence (10)
Intelligence Bulletin (6)
Iran (107)
Iraq (299)
Islamic Facism (24)
Islamists (11)
Israel (2)
Jaish al Mahdi (21)
Jihadists (51)
Kandahar (1)
Khyber (4)
Korea (1)
Lawfare (1)
Leadership (2)
Lebanon (4)
Marine Corps (71)
Marines in Helmand (13)
Media (1)
Memorial Day (1)
Military Blogging (13)
Military Equipment (14)
Mosul (4)
Mountains (2)
Mullah Fazlullah (1)
Musa Qala (1)
Music (10)
NATO (9)
Navy (3)
Nuclear (17)
Operation Alljah (7)
Pakistan (60)
Personal (4)
Petraeus (2)
Policy (4)
Politics (58)
Quds Force (9)
Recommended Reading (1)
Religion (29)
Religion and Insurgency (12)
Roads (1)
Rules of Engagement (22)
Sabbatical (1)
Saqlawiyah (1)
Saudi Arabia (1)
Scenes from Iraq (1)
SIIC (2)
Small Wars (72)
Snipers (8)
Soft Power (1)
Somalia (1)
State Department (4)
Sunni Insurgency (10)
Syria (18)
Taliban (53)
Tarmiyah (1)
TBI (1)
Technology (13)
Tehrik-i-Taliban (7)
Terrorism (74)
The Anbar Narrative (12)
The Art of War (4)
The Fallen (1)
The Long War (10)
The Wounded (8)
Transnational Insurgencies (2)
Tribes (2)
TSA Ineptitude (1)
U.S. Sovereignty (3)
UAVs (1)
Uncategorized (14)
V-22 Osprey (3)
Veterans (1)
War & Warfare (197)
War & Warfare (36)
War Reporting (13)
Warriors (3)
Weapons and Tactics (34)
Women in Combat (3)


Prev | List | Random | Next · Join Powered by RingSurf!

Site Meter

about · archives · contact · register

Copyright © 2006-2008 Captain's Journal. All rights reserved.