Scientists Are Attempting to Grow Covid Vaccine-Filled Spinach, Lettuce, Edible Plants To Replace Covid Injections
BY Herschel Smith
2 years, 5 months ago
GP.
Researchers at the University of California were awarded a $500,000 grant from the National Science Foundation developing technology that infuses experimental mRNA Covid-19 vaccines into spinach, lettuce and other edible plants.
The researchers are tasked with demonstrating the genetically modified plants can produce enough mRNA to replace Covid jabs and infuse the plants with the right dosage required to eat to replace vaccines.
[ … ]
Genetically modifying edible plants with experimental vaccines for public consumption is the culmination of a dream, the associate professor explained.
Allow me to translate. “God didn’t do a good enough job when he gave us edible plants. We can do better, and thus we’ve become God.”
What a putz.
Well, buy seeds, I guess.
On November 13, 2021 at 1:19 am, Archer said:
And the wealthy Leftist vegan yuppies overdose on mRNA and … nobody really knows what will happen.
Meanwhile, in the poor, minority neighborhoods where Michelle Obama told us it’s easier to buy a stolen gun than a fresh vegetable, they don’t get their vaccine-disguised-as-food. It’s not available, or is prohibitively expensive compared to non-genetically-engineered food.
And so the Left is screwing black kids. Again.*
All the benefit for their wealthy selves, buy none for the people they claim to want to help.
But we who advocate equal treatment and equal rights are the racist bigots. Riiiggghhht.
———
* – In this case, with all the unanswered questions about the mRNA (non-vaccine) shots’ risks versus benefits, in the long run the black community may decide being passed over was the best thing.
On November 13, 2021 at 1:36 am, Georgiaboy61 said:
Re: “Scientists Are Attempting to Grow Covid Vaccine-Filled Spinach, Lettuce, Edible Plants To Replace Covid Injections”
Informed consent is one of the cornerstones of ethical healthcare and medicine, not to mention basic science R&D as well. Attempting to genetically-modify plants and other natural food sources and then allowing the public consume it to deliver medicine without the consent of those so dosed, is not merely a crime, but a crime against humanity, an atrocity, a war crime.
“A war crime,” you say? Yes, because using food as a weapon is de facto an act of warfare against those so targeted. Somali warlords using food as a weapon of genocide was one of the reasons our forces intervened in Somalia in the early 1990s, in the first place, but I digress…
Connecting the dots isn’t all that hard if you pay attention: The communists have always attempted to seize control of the food supply as a means of controlling the population of the nations they rule. Stalin waged war upon the kulaks in the 1930s – “kulak” was the term for the relatively well-off and prosperous farmers and landowners in the Soviet Union at that time – thereby inducing a famine which wiped out millions. Mao did the same thing, more or less, in Communist China during the so-called “Great Leap Forward.”
Part-way through the current covid-19 event, billionaire Bill Gates – heretofore not someone who had ever shown much interest in agriculture – decided to start buying farmland – and at a furious pace, such that he is now holding 270,000 acres of prime cropland and is one of the largest such owners in the U.S. Gee, funny thing that, and now the billionaires and their friends at Big Ag are working on genetically-modified plants to deliver the very “drugs” – let’s be honest and call them the poisons they are – one cannot help but wonder if those croplands will be used for the new genetically-modified plants?
On November 13, 2021 at 9:29 am, Mill Tone said:
Once again the federally funded national (ahem) science foundation demonstrates that the only way to stop this non-sense is to defund the whole of the federal monster, that is, the agreement between the states. Each state must sever the ties that used to bind us.
Mill Tone
On November 13, 2021 at 9:47 am, HempRopeAndStreetlight said:
Every single person attached to this “science project” just made themselves valid military objectives.
On November 13, 2021 at 10:26 am, billrla said:
I’ve worked in ag biotech, with a start-up trying to make human monoclonal antibodies in corn. The task is extremely complicated by the realities of plant biology, and then, you have the problem of how to tests the stuff in the field without cross pollination into uncontrolled fields of crops.
Fear not, this won’t go anywhere, although it’s outrageous that $500,000 of our tax money is being laudered through Univ CA, via the scientists’ lab. Most of the money will go to university overhead (anti-American administrators ruining education) and foreign PhD students here on visas.
The federal grant system has turned education, at all levels, into a direct arm of the federal government, because, to “win” a grant, the recipients must comply–even just to submit the application.
On November 13, 2021 at 4:12 pm, umojaresearch said:
Agricultural Genocide
Universities are in part responsible for the creation, or supporting the creation of Harmful COVID VACCINES and now the Agriculture Departments seek to Disgrace Themselves by joining these Monsters for Money.
At some point Humanity will rid itself of these Crimes Against Humanity, not only the Drugs & Vaccines, but Agriculture Departments of any Universities seeking to defile Foods with Drugs, Chemicals and any other Unnatural Contaminates.
Wake Up People, Please Wake Up!
What a Disgrace
UMOJA Research
On November 13, 2021 at 11:14 pm, Hudson H Luce said:
So they’re going to use plant cells to make human mRNA? Good luck with that one. And then there’s this minor difficulty – the mRNA vaccines have to be kept cold, because they’re not thermally stable. They break apart pretty easily at room temp, which means if the vax isn’t used up within a day or so after it comes out of the fridge, it’s no good any more. Now, steam those vegetables for 20 minutes at boiling temp… And we haven’t put them in the mouth, where they get the first shot of digestive enzymes which start to break up proteins, in an environment in which alkaline hydrolysis can occur, and then into the hydrochloric acid in the stomach – where acidic hydrolysis occurs. So if there’s enough – if there’s *any* mRNA to go into the bloodstream in the intestines – you’re looking at a *highly* improbable event. And then it has to get into cells instead of being destroyed outright in the bloodstream – that’s why the vaccine is in the lipid nanoparticle sacs… My bet is that this is a payoff to a contributor, otherwise this just goes nowhere, it’s BS.
On November 14, 2021 at 2:16 am, Georgiaboy61 said:
@ billrla
Re: “Fear not, this won’t go anywhere, although it’s outrageous that $500,000 of our tax money is being laudered through Univ CA, via the scientists’ lab.”
I am not a veteran of ag biotech, as you are, but once upon a time, I was an honest-to-goodness biochemist and research scientist, and years before that, a field biologist. And can vouch for the truth of what you say vis-a-vis the difficulties of developing such technology. Nevertheless, the fact that anyone is thinking along these lines ought to chill us down to our very marrow.
On another tack, the powers-that-be may not have the capability of genetically-modifying the food supply in this manner – at least not yet – but they have released this tidbit of information anyway, to frighten all of those moms going shopping at the local supermarket and thinking that they are helping their families by buying them farm-fresh produce.
In other words, this is a psy-op being waged on Joe/Jane Six-pack. Inducing the fear that our food supply can no longer be trusted. Yes, many will possess the knowledge and insight to see through their ruse, but some will not – and will suffer because of it. How evil, how very very evil of them. What sort of a psychopath dreams up something like this, anyway?
One of the conditions psychological ops strive to generate, depending upon the precise nature of the situation and the op itself of course, is a state of fear in the population being targeted. It has been said many times, and bears repeating that the more fear the men in the shadows can generate surrounding the whole SARS-COV-19 event, the better off their bosses in the shadows will be. In other words, fear is a weapon.
On November 14, 2021 at 3:08 am, Jimmy the Saint said:
By hook or by crook, all will be made to comply.
– Government’s mantra
On November 14, 2021 at 12:04 pm, Ohio Guy said:
@Jimmy the Saint: “Byhook or by crook, all will be made to comply.” What ’70’s Brit tele show was that? I vaguely remember…
Was baking some Jiffy brand cornmuffin mix the other day and at the bottom of the contents it states made with bioengineered ingredients. It didn’t used to have that written there when my momma bought that brand years ago. Pay attention to all boxed or processed foodstuffs. You should be avoiding processed anyways. It always starts small…
On November 14, 2021 at 3:54 pm, Hudson H Luce said:
Fear is a very important part –
“Four things need to exist or need to be in place if you want a large scale mass phenomenon to emerge. The first thing is that there needs to be a lot of socially isolated people, people who experience a lack of social bonds. [lockdowns, quarantines, social distancing, masking]
The second one is that there needs to be a lot of people who experience a lack of sense-making in life. [Obvious lies in media, contradictory pronouncements by officials, nonsense rules, and the like]
And the third and the fourth conditions are that there needs to be a lot of free-floating anxiety and a lot of free-floating psychological discontent.
So: meaning, anxiety, and discontent that is not connected to a specific representation. So it needs to be in the mind without the people being able to connect it to something. If you have these four things—lack of social bonds, lack of sense-making, free-floating anxiety, and free-floating psychological discontent—then society is highly at risk for the emergence of mass formation. …
You have to know that free-floating anxiety is the most painful psychological phenomenon someone can experience. It’s extremely painful. It leads up to panic attacks, to all kinds of extremely painful psychological experiences. What people want in this situation is something to connect their anxiety to. They’re looking for an explanation for the anxiety. And now, if this free-floating anxiety is highly present in a population, and the media provide a narrative, which indicates an object of anxiety, and at the same time, describe a strategy to deal with this object of anxiety, then all the anxiety connects to this object and people are willing to follow the strategy to deal with this object, no matter what the cost is. That is what happens in the beginning of mass formation.
(00:06:42): Then in a second step, people start a collective and heroic battle with this object of anxiety. And in that way, a new kind of social bond emerges and a new kind of sense-making. Suddenly life is all directed at battling the object of anxiety and in this way, establishing a new connection with other people. And that, the sudden switch of a negative state, a radical lack of social connection, to the opposite, to the massive social connection that is experienced in a crowd. This sudden switch leads up to a sort of mental intoxication. That’s what makes mass formation, or crowd formation, the exact equivalent of hypnosis. All people who have been describing, who have been studying, mass formation, such as Gustave Le Bon, for instance [William] McDougall, [Elias] Canetti have remarked that mass formation is not similar to hypnosis; that mass formation is exactly equal to hypnosis. Mass formation is a sort of hypnosis.
(00:08:09): What happens is that at that moment, when people experience mental intoxication, it doesn’t matter anymore whether the narrative is correct or wrong, even blatantly wrong. What matters is that it leads up to this mental intoxication. And that’s why they continue to go along with the narrative, even if they could know by thinking for one second, that it is wrong. That is the central mechanism of mass formation. And that makes it so difficult to destroy it. Because for people, it doesn’t matter when the narrative is wrong. And what we try to do is we all try to show constantly that the narrative is wrong. But for people that’s not what it is all about. It’s all about the fact that they don’t want to go back to this painful state of free-floating anxiety.” …
Another consequence, that is very typical for totalitarian states, is that people become radically intolerant for dissonant voices. Because if someone tells another story, if someone claims that the official story is wrong, then this person threatens to wake the people up and they will get angry because they’re confronted with the initial anxiety and the initial psychological discontent. So they direct all that aggression at these dissonant voices, at the other voices. And at the same time, they are radically tolerant for their leaders, for the people who pronounce the mainstream narrative. These people can actually cheat and lie and manipulate and do everything they want, but they will always be forgiven by the crowd because the crowd seems to think that they do it for their own sake. That’s also part of the mechanism of mass formation.
Even if we would succeed in waking up the masses now, they would fall prey to a different story in a few years. And they would be hypnotized again, IF, IF we do not succeed in solving the real problem of this crisis. Namely the question: Why did we as a society get in this state in which a large part of the population feels anxious, depressed, experiences a lack of sense, feels socially isolated? That is the real problem. And if we do not succeed in finding out where this problem comes from then the masses will always be susceptible to leaders who try to lure them into a mass formation. So I think the real question in this crisis is: What is there in our view of man and of the world in the way in which we look at life that makes us experience lack of sense-making? In my opinion we must conclude that it is something in our materialistic mechanistic view of man in the world that leads up to a radical destruction of the real social structures and social bonds and of the feeling that life makes sense.” https://zero-sum.org/mass-formation-psychosis-and-the-coronavirus-narrative/#close