Should I Renew My NRA Membership?

BY Herschel Smith
6 years, 3 months ago

It’s membership renewal time, and I cannot forget that Wayne LaPierre endorsed Harry Reid, saying “He is a true champion of the Second Amendment back in Washington, DC.”  There was ultimately no NRA endorsement, with Chris Cox saying “Reid’s push to confirm Supreme Court Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan” prevented the NRA from endorsing Reid.

Actually, it was the strong reaction by NRA membership that prevented it from happening.  Reid secured a significant amount of money for a shooting range in Clark County, Nevada (61 million dollars of tax money, to be precise), and there has been significant politicking on this issue within the NRA, with a gag order being issued to members of the NRA board on the Kagan nomination.

And here I thought that the NRA was above buy offs, influence peddling, and general corruption.  Even now it isn’t clear to me why Wayne LaPierre and Chris Cox cannot simply be kicked to the curb and new leadership installed?  Thuggish behavior should not be tolerated, and the NRA deserves better leadership that these two men.  It is enough that they should beclown themselves and instigate internecine warfare on the board; we shouldn’t allow it to happen to the NRA too.

Yet I am just a member, and I know that there are other organizations that promise to be above the influence peddling.  So do I dump the NRA or give them one more chance?

Note: For Harry Reid’s record on the 2nd Amendment, see here.

Leave a Reply

63 Comments on "Should I Renew My NRA Membership?"

Notify of
Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
Rev. Mike

I’m shocked, shocked to find gambling going on in this establishment. When the day is done, Wayne LaPierre is just another hack lobbyist, and we should not be surprised to hear him acting like one. Ditto with Chris Cox. Saw them both at the convention back in May and could not, for the life of me, distinguish them from the appliance salesmen at the Home Depot. Better suits, but other than that …

If you think that the NRA is all that stands between us and having our guns taken from us bit by bit, then renew. Personally, I’m not aware of anyone else doing the job. If not, put the money to some other good use.

Bob Sykes

Here in Ohio, the NRA endorsed Strickland for Governor and Zack Space for the House of Representatives, two known socialists. How they missed endorsing Kucinic is beyond understanding.

I, too, and reconsidering my NRA membership. There’s always the 2nd Amendment Foundation.


Might I ask what the NRA exists for any more? They have their supreme court sign-off on individual ownership now, not only militia-based ownership. What is next? Personal rights to howitzers? To nuclear arms?

John Richardson

As much as I gag sometimes when I see Wayne LaPierre and think Chris Cox is smarmy, I upgraded my membership earlier this year to a Life Membership. So I guess the answer is yes. They drive me nuts sometime but on balance I would rather see them around than not.

If just can’t bring yourself to do it, join the Second Amendment Foundation. You don’t get junk mail from them and they really are doing good work in the courts to expand Second Amendment rights. They funded McDonald v. Chicago. That says it all for me.


Yup! they are sitting in the waste basket right alongside AARP.


I’m an NRA member, I’m pretty much a conservative (econ, not social), I utterly despise Harry Reid, and I’ll be renewing without hesitation. Why?

Because the NRA is a GUN RIGHTS organization. It is not, nor it should be, an appendage of the Republican party or a conservative PAC. If they become so, they jeopardize their mission.

If Harry Reid has a good enough gun rights voting record to earn a positive grade, or even an endorsement, from the NRA, they should – and MUST – do so. There are no other considerations that they should entertain. There are plenty of other political organizations that I can and do support who can work to get rid of Harry for very good reasons outside of gun rights.

Gun rights and the acceptance of gun culture have advanced to a point that I would never in my wildest dreams have predicted twenty years ago. The NRA deserves much of the credit for that.

While how gun owners spend their money is their business, I well remember when the NRA was a National Guard and Ready Reserve ONLY organization. It was not until 1968 that the organization started welcoming civilian members. With the signature of “Your commanding officer, an officer of the US Armed forces, or your chief law enforcement officer” on your membership application. Those were miserable days when those of us fighting the gun control advocates were essentially on our own. You do not want to go back to those days, simply because there would be nothing to argue about if the NRA had not shifted to a one issue organization in 1968. The gun banners would have won, and Americans would be as disarmed as the Brits. But they did shift policy, and we are winning. And the NRA is a very large part of that. But the NRA is far from perfect. If you do not like LaPierre and Co. and their policies you have one excellent remedy. The TEA Party solution. Vote them out. Every lifer, and every long time member, will get a ballot in a couple of months. Take the time to find out who is a… Read more »

I get the whole Harry Reed issue. He was great for 2nd amendment, but sucks at everything else. NRA is a 2nd amendment org, and the conservative membership often forgets the basics.

I tell you to renew, and vote in upcoming elections if you qualify for a packet. Get a new board by voting. Only 3.2% of elligible NRA members vote. Now where does the problem lie?


“Because the NRA is a GUN RIGHTS organization. It is not, nor it should be, an appendage of the Republican party or a conservative PAC. If they become so, they jeopardize their mission.”

Re-read paragraph 2 and then repost so as to make it clear you are actually aware of what is being discussed.


I quit the NRA a few years ago. They have done precious little for gun rights. In over a hundred years of existence they have not brought a case to the US Supreme Court, and when a winning case was finally brought by an individual, they not only didn’t support it, they tried to sink it.

They are worse than helpful, they exist almost solely to support Wayne and their staffers. They are so immersed in lobbying that they aren’t trying to support gun ownership rights. They consistently seek to increase their lobbying power, not gun owners’ rights.

They are still quite powerful, but they need massive reform or replacement.

For those who think that Sen. Reid was “great for 2nd amendment,” perhaps you should do your homework a little better. I guess if you think that making deals instead of upholding the Constitution is “great,” well then…. good luck to you. The facts are clear: The NRA has, time and again, compromised on the Second Amendment rather than truly protecting it. Senator Reid is just one example (albeit a very good one). DISCLOSE Act? Health Care Bill? Liberal/progressive Supreme Court nominations? All of these were supported by those the NRA funded, and would have (or will) — through various ways like increasing the size and scope of government as well as indirect regulations (and direct laws, in the case of the Supreme Court) — impeded on Second Amendment rights. Yet those in the NRA — and by proxy those who support it — turn a blind eye to creeping legislation and backdoor deals because it’s not *direct* gun control. The Second Amendment Foundation, Gun Owners of America, Rocky Mountain Gun Owners and the National Association for Gun Rights are doing far more to protect the true meaning of the Second Amendment now than the NRA is, and the sooner… Read more »
Moe Lane » #rsrh On Reid and NRA renewals.

[…] the NRA’s get-eaten-last strategy for the moment… I dunno, Glenn.  Based on the numbers: if we’re spotting an additional […]


Send your money to the Second Amendment Foundation. They are the leaders in fighting for our 2nd Amendment and self-defense rights. Plus, more of your money gets spent on “the cause” than with the NRA.

Have you ever seen the American Rifleman article with the NRA proclaiming that they’ve always supported gun control?

comment image

comment image

Here the source of those links:


You should have a life membership and CALL them and complain. Not only about the endorsements, but of trying to claim credit for the court victories of Alan Gura.

While you are at it, join the 2nd Amendment Foundation.

Dave Hardy

Suppose the NRA had demanded that the tea party endorse Reid, on the grounds that he did good things for shooting and was generally good on the Second Amendment, and if the tea party didn’t back him it would prove it was antigun?

I think we can agree that would be out of line. I see the converse situation — tea party demanding that NRA oppose Reid because they oppose him on their issues — as the same.

Different things were being risked. If Reid had been defeated, Chuck Schumer would be incoming majority leader. From a tea party standpoint, that’s no big change; I assume both are equally bad. From a gun rights standpoint, it’s a bloody disaster. Especially since doing something affirmative (the manufacturers’ liability protection act, the guns in parks act, etc.) had been shown to be possible.

Lina Inverse
The NRA’s opposition to Heller, was based on the concern that Sandra Day O’Connor might still be on the Supreme Court when the case hit it or that her replacement would also be anti-gun. That was a legitimate difference in opinion. The NRA is of course run for the benefit of its leaders but it’s mostly run for the benefit of its advertising company, Ackerman McQueen. The current leadership of the NRA cannot be kicked to the curb: the Cincinnati Revolt in 1977 that put the NRA back on the track of fighting gun control can no longer happen due to bylaws changes to prevent such a thing from ever happening again. And its Board is way too large to preform any sort of oversight, not that it matters with the leadership controlling the nominating process and taking advantage of their power over the membership publications. If you want to focus on the single issue of gun control, the GOA is not a good choice (look at what they score as “anti-gun” and decide for yourself). Unfortunately, while I think the Second Amendment Foundation is the current best organization to give money to due to the conference they run, the… Read more »
Clark E Myers
Some of your questions have long been answered. The Cincinnatti members revolt turned the NRA around and was eventually followed by the new insiders making another such member’s revolt at the annual meeting impossible – mostly finally accomplished at an annual meeting in Washington state 20 years later. Many have rightly pointed to flaws in the NRA – few have pointed to practical solutions. See e.g. the Knox family. Likely you are familiar with what Dr. Pournelle (Jerry) calls the iron law that some folks in a bureaucracy work for the goals and some for the structure and eventually the goals are sacrifced to the structure and so forgotten. It’s an iron law with no exceptions but with differing time lags before the goals go by the board. This time is coming for the NRA but not yet here. As noted the NRA does not have a roving commission to do good but rather to support 2nd Amendment rights. There is nobody today doing a better job at the national level – so yes rejoin and upgrade your membership if you support the cause – not the organization, the cause the goal. This assumes folks will first support a local… Read more »
Brett Bellmore

“But the NRA is far from perfect. If you do not like LaPierre and Co. and their policies you have one excellent remedy. The TEA Party solution. Vote them out. “

Um, no. We *had* that option at one time. It’s been essentially stripped away, in all but appearance, due to NRA recommended candidates being listed right next to the ballot, and independent board candidates being denied access to the mailing list. Among other ‘reforms’ designed to neuter membership control. The NRA, purposely, controls access to the membership, so that it’s virtually impossible to organize within the NRA against the ruling clique.

That said, I think they do more good than bad, and, indeed, their only rightful concern is the 2nd amendment, on which Reid is not too bad.

H. Myers

Let’s not forget the NRA’s sellout on the DISCLOSE Act. Thankfully that one did not pass. Granted the NRA is a single issue organization, but selling out the rest of the Bill of Rights is a craven act.

I agree that leadership is the problem. I would suggest a basic membership and no more. The NRA, for it’s faults, is still our number one defense against the Schumers and their ilk. But also consider CCRKBA and other organizations who understand that the Bill of Rights are linked and that separation is isolation, then defeat.


For many of us, being an NRA member is not an option. Many of the outdoor rifle ranges near me require a NRA membership to join the range, so I can give up rifles and go pistol only….or join the NRA.

Ranten N. Raven

Answer: No.

Fooling the members while supporting the gun-grabbers in back-room deals is nothing new. The NRA even supported the National Firearms Act of 1934. See

Yes, the shooting range stinks; it was clearly a sweetener. But it’s a bridge too far to assume it was a quid pro quo. If I wanted to make you think well of me, and I were a manipulative bastard, I might buy a gift for one of your friends. If I were an amoral politician, in a political culture where it was expected I’d buy the gift with Treasury money, I’d do it with Treasury money. And even though you didn’t ask for it, and you resolve to yourself not to be influenced, it might well improve your attitude to me through you seeing your friend enjoying the gift, and your friend telling you how happy he is with it. If you want to write off the NRA leadership because Washington works that way, you’re saying you don’t want anybody trying to lobby Congress at all. Because anybody who is effective in lobbying Congress will find favors being done for their friends and allies in an attempt at influence. The only way you can avoid anything that looks like corruption is to react by relentlessly assaulting anybody who does your friends/allies a favor—at which point you will render yourself… Read more »

Yes, renew. NRA is a Second Amendment organization.

The very definition of politics is building alliances to support your primary goal. While it’s easy to get disgusted by it let’s not forget that the only alternative to politics is war.

The gun control issue will never go away but I like the current trend and I say the NRA strategy is working.

I suggest that like many of us you address through different organizations all the other things that clearly disturb you as much as they disturb me. I can support the NRA and work to get rid of Harry Reid at the same time.


“Do I contradict myself? Very well, then I contradict myself , I am large, I contain multitudes.” Walt Whitman

David Starr

The NRA has been tremendously effective. It got Heller thru the Supreme Court. Members get a steady stream of powerful literature going into the election. The center spread of October Am. Riflemn. was a complete list of every one running for every office in New Hampshire, with their rating on second amendment. They endorsed Republican Charlie Bass for US Rep. That probably pushed Charlie over the top. Charlie is not everyone’s favorite Republican but he was light years ahead of the democratic candidate.
With a winning track record like that, I’m gonna keep sending in my dues, and maybe a little extra. Politics is the art of the possible.

Proud to never have been a member of the NRA. Instead my Second Amendment dollars go to Gun Owners of America and the Virginia Citizen’s Defense League. As best as I can tell Lapierre never should have run the NRA. It is not just that guys like Joaquin Jackson (Google that with NRA Board and you’ll see what I mean) are “better” than us, the real issue is that the bizarre election process to the NRA board perpetuates the cult of personality for Lapierre. I feel that every elected official needs to run scared in order to work hard for the voting constituency. NRA does not do that. Although I do not buy into everything Mr. Feldman wrote in Richochet: Confessions of a Gun Lobbiest, it was more than enough to sour me on the NRA. Don’t get me wrong, the Second Amendment is a big tent and there is room for “those crazy guys” from the NRA. They just don’t represent MY best interests and I do not like it when the general public thinks that we are ONLY the NRA. IMHO there are plenty of other organizations where dollar for dollar your Second Amendment money will do more… Read more »
Tweets that mention The Captain's Journal » Should I Renew My NRA Membership? --

[…] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Doug Goff, Pelosio. Pelosio said: The Captain's Journal » Should I Renew My NRA Membership? #SCOTUS […]

tom swift

Renew? Yes.

Like all other Civil Rights organizations, it is sometimes a force for good, and arguably sometimes a force for evil. But NRA is more often a force for good than evil. Hence, citizens concerned about gun rights should support it.

Other organizations should be supported too. GOA, GOAL, and JPFO are worthy groups. No need to be overly picky.


Life Member since the 80’s, so I can’t quit paying dues …. and they still do some (maybe even a lot of) good. Agree with everything they do, hmmm, not so much. Overall, though, I am happier being a member than not.
That said, I have been watching them slowly going down the tubes for years now; the Jerry Pournelle quote above is quite on point. Just think of “American Rifleman” from 20 years ago and compare it to last months copy. The volume of fundraising mail I get has at least doubled over the same time.
Furthermore and not on topic exactly, I could say the same thing about other national organizations I belong to. I vote in the directors elections and hope for the best.


I recently quit my membership when I heard the ad for lefty Ted Strickland bragging about his NRA endorsement. The nanny state these socialists politicians are pushing will be toxic for all our rights, including the right to bear arms. They will just take away the gun right last after they have gotten all the other ones.


Should you renew? That depends. Are you a defender of the Bill Of Rights and Second Amendment or just another Republican Party Girl?

Harry Reid voted against Clinton’s AWB in 1994. The phony, fraud “Compassionate Conservative” G.W. Bush supported it and spent 4 years trying to force its re-passage through the GOP Congress.

Then Congressman Ted Strickland bucked his party and President to vote against the AWB in ’94. The phony, fraud “conservative” John Kasich voted for the Clinton AWB in ’94 and voted against its repeal in ’96.

The NRA is single issue and non-partisan. It doesn’t grade candidates on school prayer or price supports for sugar beets.

If you want it to stay that way, please renew. If you want the NRA to subjugate itself to the GOP which endorses and funds gun ban candidates, please leave. We’ve got enough Republican sucking weak sisters as it is.


“Re-read paragraph 2 and then repost so as to make it clear you are actually aware of what is being discussed.”

I read it right the first time, ace, but just for you I gave it another read. Guess what? Neither time did it make a goddamn bit of difference to what I wrote. Maybe you could re-read my comment and then repost so as to make it clear you are actually aware of what I’m talking about.

Ranten N. Raven

Harry Reid voted against Clinton’s AWB in 1994.

Really? Via RedState there’s a link to vote number 294 on the 1994 H.R. 3355 bill, and the text of the bill is available there. The vote by Reid? “Yea.”

As for the Heller case, the NRA only got behind it after they failed to scuttle it.

(Thank God for the Internet!)

scott s.
As a competitor in conventional pistol (aka Bullseye) NRA membership is pretty much a given, though I guess you could compete in CMP EIC matches only, or go into international shooting, though the differences between international and bullseye are so great it’s hard to really compare. I think the split of NRA and USA Shooting has been unfortunate for the sport. It is possible to critique the NRA competitions division, though, I’m not sure they get as much support from the top level as they should. (As an aside, I didn’t like the decision to discontinue print distribution of “Shooting Sports” though I can see why they did it). I don’t like the NRA custom of having a huge number of directors, many seem to be there just for their celebrity status. If your only concern is RKBA and NRA-ILA then I guess you can argue forever and go with Knox if you prefer. Don’t forget besides RKBA we’re seeing more and more attacks on ranges and hunting. So you can own a firearm but you can’t actually shoot it. There’s also the problems that FFL holders have and many times the trade groups act in ways counter to small… Read more »
Seattle Con

” David Starr said:

The NRA has been tremendously effective. It got Heller thru the Supreme Court. ”

WTF are you talking about? They tried to scuttle Heller,


I did not know that the NRA tried to scuttle Heller. However, I can understand why they did. The NRA always needs the boogie man out there to generate contributions. If they were to win every court case and have universal acceptance of the 2nd amendment, they are out of a job.

The Olde Man

You folks realize that if the Supreme Court had just gone one vote the other way, we’d be so far up the creek we’d be invisible. And you wonder why the NRA was reluctant to gamble?


But then if you pure, like the GOA and others of that ilk, that thought would never occur. After all, you have the Constitution on your side and the Supreme Court would just naturally see it your way.


Herschel, the short answer to your question is “yes.” The short reason for that answer is that the NRA is the only pro-RKBA organization with an effective presence on Capitol Hill. Yes, SAF has done a great job lately with the litigation and other activities, but only the NRA has the muscle to make a difference in DC. And yes, we do make a difference there. Imagine what our federal firearms laws would look like if NRA-ILA hadn’t been defending us in DC for the last 35 years. I’m a life member, and I don’t agree with everything the leadership does, either. But you can’t allow your desire for ideological purity to get in the way of defending core principles in a realistic way. While I’m at it, some other points: (1) The supposed “gag order” on NRA board members is a ridiculous net-legend; (2) The DISCLOSE act amendment demanded by the NRA undermined liberal support for the act and probably doomed it entirely; (3) “Strong reaction from the NRA membership” prevented an endorsement of Harry Reid. I’m not sure if the leadership really intended to endorse Reid. However, if member pressure prevented such an endorsement, that makes a good… Read more »

Hey Ranten N. Raven;

My bad, you’re right. I see Reid voted against the AWB amendment to the ’94 Crime Bill but voted for the final bill when it came to the floor.

Point still stands. How many Republicans quit the Party in response to Bush endorsing the AWB and lobbying for a new one?



The “party girl” question was intended as rhetorical. My idea of some snarky fun after consuming three shots of bourbon on my day off. It wasn’t intended as a personal insult toward you and I apologize if it read that way.

I was thinking of the people who bash the NRA for supporting pro gun Dems over less pro or anti gun Repubs.

I would have liked to see the NRA endorse Angle over Reid but think I understand why they remained neutral. For four years Reid has been majority leader of the most left wing Senate in history. We’ve had the most left wing House for four years and the most left wing Pres. for two. And no fedgov anti gun legislation.

The NRA thinks Reid deserves some credit for that and would rather not see Chuckie Schumer as majority leader.

There’s plenty wrong with the NRA but it’s really the only game in town.

Tim K

The NRA is 100% pro-second amendment, and consider the alternative – Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, who doesn’t have one ounce of positive second amendment feelings within his entire body. The National Rifle Association is as strong as ever, and deserves our support.

A lot of Republican “conservative” heroes have been banging away on their keyboards slamming the NRA for its refusal to spend millions of members dollars opposing the “Disclosure Act”. Once the Disclosure Act was re-written to exclude the NRA from its provisions, it would have been irresponsible for the NRA to spend millions opposing a law which didn’t affect the NRA or its members. What was the Disclosure Act? A very watered down version of the McCain/Feingold “Campaign Finance Reform” Which SCOTUS found unconstitutional. The NRA vigorously opposed McCain/Feingold. How did we get the 1st Amendment eviscerating “Campaign Finance Reform” in the first place? I’m so glad you asked! It was co-sponsored by the “conservative” John McCain. Republicans were so upset by McCain for this they nominated him for Pres. in 2008! McCain/Feingold was passed by a Republican House, a Republican Senate and signed into law by G.W. Bush. Republicans were so “outraged” by Bush signing this unconstitutional law they re-nominated him for President and got him re-elected. After being screwed, blued and tattooed by phony. fraud, plastic banana “conservatives” like Bush, Rove, Cheney, Frist and Hastert, the NRA decided to sit out the fight over the “Disclosure Act” because… Read more »
Lina Inverse
Raoul: the special deal the NRA got for the DISCLOSE Act fits perfectly with Jerry Pournelle’s Iron Law of Bureaucracy, a version of which I’ll quote here: […] in any bureaucratic organization there will be two kinds of people: those who work to further the actual goals of the organization, and those who work for the organization itself. Examples in education would be teachers who work and sacrifice to teach children, vs. union representative who work to protect any teacher including the most incompetent. The Iron Law states that in all cases, the second type of person will always gain control of the organization, and will always write the rules under which the organization functions. A deal which protected only big organizations (also the AARP and the Humane Society (I think that’s the anti-hunting one), organizations with more than 500,000 members) would have cut off at the knees all the state RKBA organizations. As of late, with the RKBA having become a Third Rail in D.C., that’s where almost all the nation’s RKBA action is, witness the nationwide sweep of “shall issue” concealed carry laws (latest being Iowa starting January 1st and with the local election results we expect Wisconsin… Read more »
Lina Inverse
Bartholomew Roberts: The NRA was fantastically stupid in the way they went about endorsing him. In an election season where the RKBA basically wasn’t on the table (or, rather, in WV advertisements of Joe Manchin shooting a copy of the cap and trade bill helped save his campaign for Senator) and out of control spending and earmarks were among the most important issues, the NRA gave their membership the appearance that their endorsement could be bought with a 61 million dollar earmark. That was unbelievably tone deaf and did serious damage to the organization, as witnessed by this blog posting by Mr. Smith, my father’s decision to stop sending them any extra money (he has a few years to decide on membership), their having to withhold the endorsement at the last moment, and the incredibly defensive posture they had to take after that membership magazine article on the earmark came out. Due to his past gun grabbing—he only felt the heat and saw the light in 2006, which you can confirm that for yourself by looking at his individual votes as counted by the GOA (but do your own scoring, please!): select the votes tab on this page and near… Read more »
Bartholomew Roberts
Due to his past gun grabbing—he only felt the heat and saw the light in 2006, which you can confirm that for yourself by looking at his individual votes as counted by the GOA (but do your own scoring, please!) Actually, the three NO votes I highlighted above all happened in 2004. Reid started out bad on gun rights and has gradually improved over the years, though I suspect that is more due to the necessity of being reelected than any real belief on his part. However, let’s go with your characterization. We have Reid, in the last 4 years he has mostly pro-RKBA voting. He has a Democratic House and Senate – filibuster proof majority in the Senate even. Yet despite an excellent opportunity to pass more gun control, Reid not only does not shaft us, he continued to help gun bills get through the Senate. So is “endorsing” Reid clearly so stupid that it shouldn’t be a question at all or is there a point to having a friendly Senate Majority Leader given that the Senate is unlikely to change hands? your claim that they are “the boss” is completely at odds with the recent history of the… Read more »
Lina Inverse
Mr Smith: to flesh out a little more the thesis that the NRA is and has always been America’s most effective gun control organization at the Federal level, here’s a bit off the top of my head in support of the allegation that every Federal gun control law prior to the “assault weapons” (AW) ban was supported by the NRA (and I’d ask that anyone who disagrees to please provide counterexamples that I will then respond to): NFA of 1933: The “compromise” for it was to not include handguns. GCA of 1968: Start with mikeSilver’s comment above, also note that Charlton Heston was a major supporter of it (although not at the time a prominent NRA member; he played off his cowboy movie cred). There’s lots more but I’m not too familiar with it since I joined the fight after reading about the BATF’s abuses based on it (when sugar price supports destroyed the market for moonshine, they obviously had to do something with all their out of work agents; Waco was a long term result of that and all this has done terrible damage to the Republic). GOPA of 1986: included a questionable voice vote provision outlawing the sale… Read more »
Lina Inverse

Bartholomew Roberts: Let me reemphasize what I said:

effectively complete control over the nominating and election process”

De facto, not de jure control in the combination of both parts of the process though their control of the nominating committee and the membership magazines. If the petition only process has produced any board election winners as of late, please inform us; I would not know because:

I was a member for a long time (1975 or 6 to late ’90s) and voted; the final prod to not renew was after it became clear the Board election game was rigged, the Board has no effective control over the executives (see previous comment on corporate governance) and the passage of the by-law changes set this in concrete. In combination with the observation that they were America’s most effective gun control organization.

Bartholomew Roberts
NFA of 1933: The “compromise” for it was to not include handguns. As was already pointed out earlier, the NRA of 1934 bears about as much relation to the NRA of 2010 as the Democratic Party of 1934 does to the Democratic Party of 2010. It was a sport shooting organization, not a lobbying group. GCA of 1968 Although the NRA did not affirmatively support the Gun Control Act of 1968, … the American firearms industry supported it for economic reasons. …” Don Kates, November 1983 Michigan Law Review, “Handgun Prohibition and the Original Meaning of the Second Amendment,” Hmmm, good point about the firearms industry not always having interests in line with its consumers. It would be nice if there were a strong organization out there to bridge that gap and give the consumers a voice, eh? FOPA of 1986 You mean the bill that repealed larged chunks of the 1968 Gun Control Act? The bill was only the second bill to ever be passed into law through a discharge petition against the wishes of the House leadership? included a questionable voice vote provision outlawing the sale to civilians of machine guns made after it You mean the same… Read more »

You are currently reading "Should I Renew My NRA Membership?", entry #5795 on The Captain's Journal.

This article is filed under the category(s) Second Amendment and was published November 28th, 2010 by Herschel Smith.

If you're interested in what else the The Captain's Journal has to say, you might try thumbing through the archives and visiting the main index, or; perhaps you would like to learn more about TCJ.

26th MEU (10)
Abu Muqawama (12)
ACOG (2)
ACOGs (1)
Afghan National Army (36)
Afghan National Police (17)
Afghanistan (677)
Afghanistan SOFA (4)
Agriculture in COIN (3)
AGW (1)
Air Force (31)
Air Power (9)
al Qaeda (83)
Ali al-Sistani (1)
America (7)
Ammunition (26)
Animals in War (4)
Ansar al Sunna (15)
Anthropology (3)
Antonin Scalia (1)
AR-15s (86)
Arghandab River Valley (1)
Arlington Cemetery (2)
Army (49)
Assassinations (2)
Assault Weapon Ban (26)
Australian Army (5)
Azerbaijan (4)
Backpacking (2)
Badr Organization (8)
Baitullah Mehsud (21)
Basra (17)
BATFE (53)
Battle of Bari Alai (2)
Battle of Wanat (17)
Battle Space Weight (3)
Bin Laden (7)
Blogroll (2)
Blogs (7)
Body Armor (17)
Books (2)
Border War (7)
Brady Campaign (1)
Britain (27)
British Army (35)
Camping (4)
Canada (2)
Castle Doctrine (1)
Caucasus (6)
Center For a New American Security (8)
Charity (3)
China (10)
Christmas (8)
CIA (23)
Civilian National Security Force (3)
Col. Gian Gentile (9)
Combat Outposts (3)
Combat Video (2)
Concerned Citizens (6)
Constabulary Actions (3)
Coolness Factor (2)
COP Keating (4)
Corruption in COIN (4)
Council on Foreign Relations (1)
Counterinsurgency (215)
DADT (2)
David Rohde (1)
Defense Contractors (2)
Department of Defense (130)
Department of Homeland Security (16)
Disaster Preparedness (3)
Distributed Operations (5)
Dogs (6)
Donald Trump (1)
Drone Campaign (3)
EFV (3)
Egypt (12)
El Salvador (1)
Embassy Security (1)
Enemy Spotters (1)
Expeditionary Warfare (17)
F-22 (2)
F-35 (1)
Fallujah (17)
Far East (3)
Fathers and Sons (1)
Favorite (1)
Fazlullah (3)
FBI (7)
Featured (177)
Federal Firearms Laws (18)
Financing the Taliban (2)
Firearms (585)
Football (1)
Force Projection (35)
Force Protection (4)
Force Transformation (1)
Foreign Policy (27)
Fukushima Reactor Accident (6)
Ganjgal (1)
Garmsir (1)
general (14)
General Amos (1)
General James Mattis (1)
General McChrystal (41)
General McKiernan (6)
General Rodriguez (3)
General Suleimani (7)
Georgia (19)
Google (1)
Gulbuddin Hekmatyar (1)
Gun Control (471)
Guns (1,082)
Guns In National Parks (3)
Haditha Roundup (10)
Haiti (2)
Haqqani Network (9)
Hate Mail (7)
Hekmatyar (1)
Heroism (4)
Hezbollah (12)
High Capacity Magazines (11)
High Value Targets (9)
Homecoming (1)
Homeland Security (1)
Horses (1)
Humor (13)
ICOS (1)
IEDs (7)
Immigration (54)
India (10)
Infantry (3)
Information Warfare (2)
Infrastructure (2)
Intelligence (22)
Intelligence Bulletin (6)
Iran (169)
Iraq (378)
Iraq SOFA (23)
Islamic Facism (44)
Islamists (69)
Israel (18)
Jaish al Mahdi (21)
Jalalabad (1)
Japan (2)
Jihadists (80)
John Nagl (5)
Joint Intelligence Centers (1)
JRTN (1)
Kabul (1)
Kajaki Dam (1)
Kamdesh (9)
Kandahar (12)
Karachi (7)
Kashmir (2)
Khost Province (1)
Khyber (11)
Knife Blogging (2)
Korea (4)
Korengal Valley (3)
Kunar Province (20)
Kurdistan (3)
Language in COIN (5)
Language in Statecraft (1)
Language Interpreters (2)
Lashkar-e-Taiba (2)
Law Enforcement (3)
Lawfare (6)
Leadership (5)
Lebanon (6)
Leon Panetta (2)
Let Them Fight (2)
Libya (14)
Lines of Effort (3)
Littoral Combat (8)
Logistics (49)
Long Guns (1)
Lt. Col. Allen West (2)
Marine Corps (244)
Marines in Bakwa (1)
Marines in Helmand (67)
Marjah (4)
Media (31)
Memorial Day (2)
Mexican Cartels (24)
Mexico (30)
Michael Yon (5)
Micromanaging the Military (7)
Middle East (1)
Military Blogging (26)
Military Contractors (4)
Military Equipment (24)
Militia (4)
Mitt Romney (3)
Monetary Policy (1)
Moqtada al Sadr (2)
Mosul (4)
Mountains (15)
MRAPs (1)
Mullah Baradar (1)
Mullah Fazlullah (1)
Mullah Omar (3)
Musa Qala (4)
Music (16)
Muslim Brotherhood (6)
Nation Building (2)
National Internet IDs (1)
National Rifle Association (17)
NATO (15)
Navy (21)
Navy Corpsman (1)
NCOs (3)
News (1)
NGOs (2)
Nicholas Schmidle (2)
Now Zad (19)
NSA (2)
NSA James L. Jones (6)
Nuclear (53)
Nuristan (8)
Obama Administration (218)
Offshore Balancing (1)
Operation Alljah (7)
Operation Khanjar (14)
Ossetia (7)
Pakistan (165)
Paktya Province (1)
Palestine (5)
Patriotism (6)
Patrolling (1)
Pech River Valley (11)
Personal (33)
Petraeus (14)
Pictures (1)
Piracy (13)
Pistol (2)
Pizzagate (21)
Police (241)
Police in COIN (3)
Policy (15)
Politics (316)
Poppy (2)
PPEs (1)
Prisons in Counterinsurgency (12)
Project Gunrunner (20)
PRTs (1)
Qatar (1)
Quadrennial Defense Review (2)
Quds Force (13)
Quetta Shura (1)
RAND (3)
Recommended Reading (14)
Refueling Tanker (1)
Religion (114)
Religion and Insurgency (19)
Reuters (1)
Rick Perry (4)
Rifles (1)
Roads (4)
Rolling Stone (1)
Ron Paul (1)
ROTC (1)
Rules of Engagement (74)
Rumsfeld (1)
Russia (29)
Sabbatical (1)
Sangin (1)
Saqlawiyah (1)
Satellite Patrols (2)
Saudi Arabia (4)
Scenes from Iraq (1)
Second Amendment (173)
Second Amendment Quick Hits (2)
Secretary Gates (9)
Sharia Law (3)
Shura Ittehad-ul-Mujahiden (1)
SIIC (2)
Sirajuddin Haqqani (1)
Small Wars (72)
Snipers (9)
Sniveling Lackeys (2)
Soft Power (4)
Somalia (8)
Sons of Afghanistan (1)
Sons of Iraq (2)
Special Forces (24)
Squad Rushes (1)
State Department (18)
Statistics (1)
Sunni Insurgency (10)
Support to Infantry Ratio (1)
Supreme Court (2)
Survival (13)
SWAT Raids (53)
Syria (38)
Tactical Drills (1)
Tactical Gear (1)
Taliban (167)
Taliban Massing of Forces (4)
Tarmiyah (1)
TBI (1)
Technology (16)
Tehrik-i-Taliban (78)
Terrain in Combat (1)
Terrorism (92)
Thanksgiving (6)
The Anbar Narrative (23)
The Art of War (5)
The Fallen (1)
The Long War (20)
The Surge (3)
The Wounded (13)
Thomas Barnett (1)
Transnational Insurgencies (5)
Tribes (5)
TSA (14)
TSA Ineptitude (11)
TTPs (1)
U.S. Border Patrol (5)
U.S. Border Security (14)
U.S. Sovereignty (17)
UAVs (2)
UBL (4)
Ukraine (3)
Uncategorized (42)
Universal Background Check (3)
Unrestricted Warfare (4)
USS Iwo Jima (2)
USS San Antonio (1)
Uzbekistan (1)
V-22 Osprey (4)
Veterans (2)
Vietnam (1)
War & Warfare (212)
War & Warfare (40)
War Movies (3)
War Reporting (18)
Wardak Province (1)
Warriors (6)
Waziristan (1)
Weapons and Tactics (57)
West Point (1)
Winter Operations (1)
Women in Combat (18)
WTF? (1)
Yemen (1)

March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006

about · archives · contact · register

Copyright © 2006-2017 Captain's Journal. All rights reserved.