What is Headspace? (And Why It Matters)
Ian does a very good job of explaining head space and the potential risks of having it wrong.
Ian does a very good job of explaining head space and the potential risks of having it wrong.
TALLAHASSEE (FLV) – Gov. Ron DeSantis and Florida House Speaker Paul Renner said Florida will pass constitutional carry legislation.
DeSantis was asked at a press conference if his administration will be able to pass constitutional carry.
The governor responded and said “I’ll let Paul [Renner] answer that because I’m ready, so you guys gonna do it?”
“Yes,” Renner responded.
NEW: Florida House Speaker @Paul_Renner and Gov. Ron DeSantis say state will pass constitutional carry
Question: "Are you gonna be able to pass constitutional carry?"
DeSantis: "I'm ready, so are you guys gonna do it?"
Renner: "Yes." pic.twitter.com/KFAXDQw3Uj— Florida’s Voice (@FLVoiceNews) December 15, 2022
Let’s hope it happens this time, but another delay is highly possible given the weak state of legislative leadership in Florida.
I’m especially interested in seeing open carry legalized in Florida, as I know The Armed Fisherman is. If we can get open carry, it won’t be necessary any longer to do stuff like this.
It’s my understanding that constitutional carry includes open carry, but if they don’t formulate the law this way, that is, if they formulate a bill that only removes the permitting scheme, this fight will have to continue.
From U.S. v. Reyna, decided yesterday by Judge Robert Miller, Jr. (N.D. Ind.) (for a case reaching the opposite result, see this post):
[ … ]
Guns with obliterated serial numbers belong to “those weapons not typically possessed by law-abiding citizens for lawful purposes” so possession of such guns isn’t within the Second Amendment’s scope. Heller. Guns with obliterated serial numbers are useful for criminal activity because identifying who possessed a firearm is more difficult when the serial number is destroyed. By using a gun without a serial number, a criminal ensures he has a greater higher likelihood of evading justice.
Mr. Reyna might be right that a deserialized gun is just as useful for self-defense as a gun with its serial number intact, but that doesn’t suggest that deserialized guns are typically used by law-abiding citizens for lawful purposes.
Nice try. Now do Bruen.
Do like Judge Benitez ordered and go find me laws written at the time of the 2A requiring serialization of firearms. I dare you. Supply us with a complete catalog of said laws.
We all know how you want the 2A to read: “Given that intermediate scrutiny allows us to prioritize our view of public safety, the right of law enforcement to know at all times what you’re building in your basement shall not be infringed.”
But the 2A isn’t really about the rights of law enforcement is it, and Bruen did away with the idiotic notion of scrutiny, didn’t it?
There is a 150-grain hunting bullet that at 100 yards will penetrate at least 23 inches and expand as much or more than either with similar bullets. Not only that, but it will do so while producing just 13 foot-pounds of recoil energy when fired from a 7-pound rifle. That’s 6 and 11 foot-pounds less than the .308 and .30/06, respectively. So, what is miracle cartridge? It’s the .30/30 Winchester.
How could the ancient .30/30 possibly outperform two 30-caliber cartridges that are considered by many to be the best big-game cartridges of all time? The answer is simpler than you might think. With conventional bullets, the higher velocities of the .308 and .30/06 cause more bullet erosion, which reduces weight, and in turn, penetration.
You might argue that the higher impact velocities of the latter tend to create more tissue damage. That’s true, and if sufficient penetration is reached by all three of these, the ones fired from the .308 and .30/06 might in fact put an animal down faster. But not any deader, and none of that is quantifiable. What really counts is penetration …
In his 1970s book, The Hunting Rifle, Jack O’Connor talked about an old hand he’d encountered who’d hunted Wyoming, Montana, and the Yukon, and typically took 17 or 18 elk with a single box (20 rounds) of .30/30 ammo. He told O’Connor that a moose, lung shot with a .30/30, would run about 75 to 100 yards and die. Well before that, African professional hunter Wally Johnson took a .30/30 Winchester to Africa and used it to kill lions. The effectiveness of the .30/30 Winchester on big game should never be questioned; it has more than a century of proof sanctioning it.
Given the untold numbers of deer taken with Winchester Model 94s and Marlin 336s over the last century, it should come as a bit of a shock that some of today’s younger hunters will ask: Is the .30/30 good for deer hunting? Um, yes. For decades and decades, it was consider the deer cartridge.
Right on. Preach it!
The normally reliable Ron Spomer did a recent video favorably comparing the 300 Blackout to the 30-30. It’s so wrong in my opinion that I’m not even linking it.
The 300 BO has a 125 grain bullet travelling at 2215 FPS. The box of 30-30 I’m looking at now shows a 150 grain bullet travelling at 2390 FPS. 25 grains and 175 FPS is enough difference to make a difference. Remember, the energy computation squares the velocity.
A small Iowa town of 800 residents likely has no need for a police force armed with 90 machine guns to keep the peace.
That, at least, is the view of federal prosecutors, who on Wednesday announced the indictment of Adair Chief of Police Bradley Wendt on charges of making false statements to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives to obtain numerous machine guns over a four-year period on behalf of the Adair Police Department, which during Wendt’s tenure has never had more than three officers.
Instead, according to prosecutors, weapons were resold for profit through Wendt’s private gun store or another store owned by a friend who also is facing charges.
According to court filings and a press release from the U.S. Attorney’s Office, Wendt used his position as police chief to obtain 10 machine guns for the official use of the police department, but later resold at least six of those weapons for “significant profit.”
In addition, Wendt obtained 13 guns for his Dennison- and Anita-based gun store, BW Outfitters, under the pretense they were to be used as demonstration models for potential future purchases by the department. Another 10 weapons were obtained in the same manner for Williams Contracting, a business Williams owned that is federally licensed as a firearms dealer.
Prosecutors say Wendt sought to purchase or demonstrate approximately 90 machine guns between July 2018 and August 2022. Some of the weapons were used for public machine gun shoots, where Wendt and Williams charged customers money to be able to fire the weapons.
The indictment describes the firearms as fully automatic weapons not legally available to the public, including an M60 machine gun, a belt-fed weapon widely used by the U.S. military since the Vietnam war that was purportedly obtained for official use by the Adair Police Department.
Wendt also sought repeatedly to obtain for the department a rotary M134 minigun capable of firing 50 rounds per second, usually mounted on military helicopters. The ATF denied the requested transfer.
“The Adair Police Department does not own a helicopter,” the indictment notes.
Wendt is charged with 18 counts of making a false statement to the ATF and one for unlawfully possessing a machine gun. Williams is charged with three counts of false statements and with aiding and abetting. Prosecutors are also seeking forfeiture of at least 35 machine guns involved in the case.
“Brad Wendt is charged with exploiting his position as chief of police to unlawfully obtain and sell guns for his own personal profit,” Eugene Kowel, a senior FBI agent based in Omaha, said in a statement. “The FBI is committed to working with our law enforcement partners to investigate and hold accountable those who violate their oath of office to enrich themselves.”
Well, that last part is a pregnant bit of prose, yes?
So no doubt he wanted to enrich himself. He’s corrupt like so many other LEOs. But if the FBI is so committed to hold those accountable who violate their oath of office, how about those ATF agents who violate the 2A?
For whatever reason, Matthew 7:3-5 comes to mind.
There is a solution to all of this, of course. Undo the infringement of the NFA, GCA and Hughes Amendment. Then no one will be able to enrich themselves this way by selling machine guns.
I wonder if she knows how stupid she sounds? I also wonder if soy-boy to her left knows how idiotic he looks with that silly grin?
It should be noted once again that these jerks are in charge because people vote for them.
This is the primary reason hunters pull the cord on all-day sits. It’s tough to sit in a tree or ground blind all day, but it’s almost impossible to do so if you’re too cold, too warm or soaking wet. That’s why high-quality clothing is worth the price.
Hunters have learned that layering is the key to regulating temperature. The widely accepted three-layer system, which consists of a base layer, mid layer and outer layer, works well, but you must understand why this system works—and what may cause it to fail.
The base layer should be made of thin, wicking fabric. Cotton is out because it holds moisture, which robs the body of heat. The mid layer is an insulating layer that is designed to hold heat while still wicking away moisture. The outer layer is your protection against wind and rain, and it provides an additional insulating layer. Moisture is your enemy, so don’t pile on all your layers then hike a mile to your stand. Instead, shed your top layer and allow the perspiration to evaporate. Any exposed skin will lose heat, so a face mask, beanie and gloves that extend above the cuff of your jacket will help retain heat. Mittens are warmer than gloves, but in recent years I’ve come to prefer a hand-warmer muff with heat packs inside, and I always carry extra hand and foot warmers. In extreme cold, a sleeping bag or body suit will help keep you warm.
While I can’t say I live in the coldest of climates (certainly not compared to some of my readers), I can say that I have never gotten cold during a sit. Boredom is my biggest enemy.
I wear a short sleeve sports shirt, wicking and non-cotton, with a long sleeve Merino wool shirt over that, the next layer is fleece, and the final layer is a Simms GorTex Parka. It’s pricey, but fishing companies make the best rain gear.
I use Mechanix camo Impact gloves for mild days, and if it’s really cold I have Swany brand ski gloves. I might invest in another brand (Hestra Guide Gloves), but they’re very pricey.
One trick I’ve known all of my life is that you lose a lot of warm air up through your neck coming from your whole body. Using the hood of your parka prevents most of that. Also, if you’re prone to your face getting cold, wear a balaclava.
Finally, a really enjoyed wearing a neck gaiter for the first time last season. There is nothing like it.
Here are three good reviews of the new form, admittedly a bit wordy in places, but make sure not to miss the nuance. They all seem to add different things to the full analysis.
I guess the moral of the story is to be very careful in the future what you say, what you sign, and how your purchase your firearms. Not that you aren’t already so, but increased diligence is required in the future.
In particular, I don’t like the question asking where you are within the city limits where you reside. I also see this as fomenting the upcoming war between the DOJ/ATF and local, county and state law enforcement over the 2A, with the former pressing increased infringements, and the later exercising nullification. I’ve told you to watch out for this as the movement expands and increases over the country. And expand it will, you can be sure.
This comes via Ken’s site. It should be a daily stop for you.
Remarks: Listen carefully to what the CEO said when they brought the idea for the predecessor to the Model 70 to him. In my own experience, CEOs rarely if ever make good or right decisions for companies. It would nearly always be better to put major company decisions up to a vote of the employees, bit a second option would be to use a random number generator to make company decisions. It would usually be better than what corporate officers decide.
Just wow. If this is the level of reasoning present in the courtrooms of American, it’s no wonder we are in such trouble. The judges are just awful, especially Thacker (while Neimeyer and Richardson are only slightly better), and while Neimeyer and Richardson should probably be disallowed from doing anything more complicated than sweeping floors, I’m not certain that Thacker should even be allowed to answer phone calls.
I’m also not very impressed with the first attorney, but the second one (arguing for the state of Maryland for the AWB) was as dishonest as he was disrespectful of the judges. He had the gall to argue that the fact that so many people own AR-15s didn’t mean that it was in common use for self defense. He wanted the case to be remanded back to the district court to develop that argument (he doubts that it’s ever been used).
It’s astonishing that the judges didn’t hold him in contempt for making such a ridiculous argument. Even after Bruen, the state of Maryland still cannot abide the ownership of America’s Rifle, and also cannot seem to come up with good arguments against it. If the judges allow that bit of stupidity he expressed to hold the day, it’s a stupider court than I had even imagined.
And I’m very unimpressed with the 4th Circuit. For what it’s worth, the entire edifice of whether a weapon was once in military use is silly and was never a good foundation. All weapons were used in the military, pump action shotguns, semiautomatic shotguns, bolt action rifles, semiautomatic rifles, machine guns, cannon, knives, etc.
Listen to it all, or begin at 24 minutes if you want to hear someone actually argue that ownership of said weapon doesn’t count as common use if it hasn’t actually been used in a self defense scenario. He wants you to suffer a home invasion in order to kill his argument in court.
Gun controllers are such awful people.