How to Lose in Iraq: Inconsistent and Inequitable Policy
BY Herschel Smith
19 years, 2 months ago
In Al Qaeda, Indigenous Sunnis and the Insurgency in Iraq, we discussed the two-step process by which the United States Marines have prevailed in the Anbar province. First, they have substantially militarily defeated both the terrorists and the indigenous insurgency. Second, upon recognition of this and settling with the enemy, U.S. forces have actually made military use of the erstwhile insurgents for both intelligence and kinetic operations against the remaining terrorist and insurgent elements. It has been observed that “Americans learned a basic lesson of warfare here: that Iraqis, bludgeoned for 24 years by Saddam’s terror, are wary of rising against any force, however brutal, until it is in retreat. In Anbar, Sunni extremists were the dominant force, with near-total popular support or acquiescence, until the offensive broke their power.”
Having militarily lost, and seeking a place in the new government, the tide has turned against the terrorists, as we observed in The Counterinsurgency Campaign in Anbar Expands. ““This is much less about al-Qaeda overstepping than about them [Sunnis] realizing that they’ve lost,
Need to Know 8.16.2007 – Fighting the Lies of the Left, General Petraeus’s Report, The Surge, and a Calls for Help…
Need to Know is a short roundup of key stories that shouldn’t be missed on your cruise through the blogosphere. The number of links in the roundup may vary but if you find it here you can trust that it’s must-read material.
Blackfive
Notice…
[…] The Captain’s Journal had a good article on how to lose in Iraq last week, and California Conservative talked about a new Iraqi governing coalition that might have a smidgen of promise. […]