When you login first time using a Social Login button, we collect your account public profile information shared by Social Login provider, based on your privacy settings. We also get your email address to automatically create an account for you in our website. Once your account is created, you'll be logged-in to this account.
DisagreeAgree
I allow to create an account
When you login first time using a Social Login button, we collect your account public profile information shared by Social Login provider, based on your privacy settings. We also get your email address to automatically create an account for you in our website. Once your account is created, you'll be logged-in to this account.
DisagreeAgree
3 Comments
Oldest
NewestMost Voted
Georgiaboy61
5 years ago
Speaking as a former member of the retail FA & accessories business, chances are your local big-box sporting goods emporium will try to sell you more ‘glass’ than you need. If you live in the Eastern United States, chances are you don’t need a whole lot of magnification on that scoped deer rifle, maybe 4x to 6x at most…. if you need an optic at all. Long shots of greater than 100-150 yards being rare in many locations. And there are plenty of scope manufacturers able and willing to sell you a variable power 3-10×40 with a duplex reticle or the like. Anything more than that, and on max power, your field of view (FOV) will resemble looking through a soda straw, and you won’t be able to track that nice buck as he moves as well as you’d like. More magnification equals a smaller field of view, that’s the physics of the deal. However, the sales guy will try and sell you a fancy rig worth a grand or more, whether you need it or not. That Nightforce has been sitting there long-enough, and the G.M.wants it moved. Hey, if getting it makes you happy, go for it…. just be aware that it is way more than you actually need. Pareto’s Law applies and so does the law of diminishing returns. A generation ago, features now found on bargain-priced scopes were rare, and even high-end optics did not always perform up-to-snuff. It is no exaggeration to state that the typical budget-priced optic found in most sporting goods stores today is better than the Army and Marine Corps took into the field in Vietnam in the 1960s and 1970s. Today’s scope is better-water-proofed, resists fogging better, tracks truer, and has better-quality glass installed in it. And most are more-durable, too, than their forebearers (although Unertl scopes were built like tanks, which is one reason the ‘Corps used them for so long). You can get a lot of scope these days for $300-400, and even more for $400-700. Beyond that, the sky’s the limit. The best European optics cost more because their glass is the finest money can buy. U.S. Optics and Leupold – which are both U.S. companies – have glass which is equally-as-good in their best products. It is an open secret in the optics industry that a few high-end firms make glass under sub-contracting arrangements, for a large number of other firms. Schott Glass Works, Zeiss, I.R. Valdala, and Leica are examples. There are also select U.S. and Japanese firms manufacturing to their standard. First-focal plane (FFP) scopes are designed such that their reticles change in size in proportion to the magnification power chosen. Meaning that they are “true” and correct at all magnifications. If your reticle has wind, holdover or other features, this may be important to you. Many tactical scopes are FFP. Also, front-focal plane scopes generally cost more than second-focal plane (SFP) designs. If you need the reticle to be true and correct at multiple… Read more »
billrla
5 years ago
Georgiaboy61:
Thanks for your well informed insights. I’ve stayed in the $250-$750ish price range with four low power Leupold scopes on three different rifles for three different purposes, with some overlap, but, not much.
When it comes to scopes, I am self-taught, and I learned that it is most important to focus on my intended uses and ambitions for the distances and types of environments in which I am most likely to be using a particular rifle.
It’s important to be honest with oneself about one’s true needs and not to get romanced by slick advertising and misguided by fear of missing out on the latest and greatest new thing. Getting older also puts a damper on one’s tendency to overdo it.
Georgiaboy61
5 years ago
@ billrla
Re: “Getting older also puts a damper on one’s tendency to overdo it.”
There’s a few compensations to getting on in years, to take some of the sting out of the aches-and-pains of advancing years. And one of them is figuring out what works for you, as opposed to what other folks think ought to work for you. At least that’s my take on it.
This article is filed under the category(s) AR-15s and was published April 28th, 2021 by Herschel Smith.
If you're interested in what else the The Captain's Journal has to say, you might try thumbing through the archives and visiting the main index, or; perhaps you would like to learn more about TCJ.
Speaking as a former member of the retail FA & accessories business, chances are your local big-box sporting goods emporium will try to sell you more ‘glass’ than you need. If you live in the Eastern United States, chances are you don’t need a whole lot of magnification on that scoped deer rifle, maybe 4x to 6x at most…. if you need an optic at all. Long shots of greater than 100-150 yards being rare in many locations. And there are plenty of scope manufacturers able and willing to sell you a variable power 3-10×40 with a duplex reticle or the like. Anything more than that, and on max power, your field of view (FOV) will resemble looking through a soda straw, and you won’t be able to track that nice buck as he moves as well as you’d like. More magnification equals a smaller field of view, that’s the physics of the deal. However, the sales guy will try and sell you a fancy rig worth a grand or more, whether you need it or not. That Nightforce has been sitting there long-enough, and the G.M.wants it moved. Hey, if getting it makes you happy, go for it…. just be aware that it is way more than you actually need. Pareto’s Law applies and so does the law of diminishing returns. A generation ago, features now found on bargain-priced scopes were rare, and even high-end optics did not always perform up-to-snuff. It is no exaggeration to state that the typical budget-priced optic found in most sporting goods stores today is better than the Army and Marine Corps took into the field in Vietnam in the 1960s and 1970s. Today’s scope is better-water-proofed, resists fogging better, tracks truer, and has better-quality glass installed in it. And most are more-durable, too, than their forebearers (although Unertl scopes were built like tanks, which is one reason the ‘Corps used them for so long). You can get a lot of scope these days for $300-400, and even more for $400-700. Beyond that, the sky’s the limit. The best European optics cost more because their glass is the finest money can buy. U.S. Optics and Leupold – which are both U.S. companies – have glass which is equally-as-good in their best products. It is an open secret in the optics industry that a few high-end firms make glass under sub-contracting arrangements, for a large number of other firms. Schott Glass Works, Zeiss, I.R. Valdala, and Leica are examples. There are also select U.S. and Japanese firms manufacturing to their standard. First-focal plane (FFP) scopes are designed such that their reticles change in size in proportion to the magnification power chosen. Meaning that they are “true” and correct at all magnifications. If your reticle has wind, holdover or other features, this may be important to you. Many tactical scopes are FFP. Also, front-focal plane scopes generally cost more than second-focal plane (SFP) designs. If you need the reticle to be true and correct at multiple… Read more »
Georgiaboy61:
Thanks for your well informed insights. I’ve stayed in the $250-$750ish price range with four low power Leupold scopes on three different rifles for three different purposes, with some overlap, but, not much.
When it comes to scopes, I am self-taught, and I learned that it is most important to focus on my intended uses and ambitions for the distances and types of environments in which I am most likely to be using a particular rifle.
It’s important to be honest with oneself about one’s true needs and not to get romanced by slick advertising and misguided by fear of missing out on the latest and greatest new thing. Getting older also puts a damper on one’s tendency to overdo it.
@ billrla
Re: “Getting older also puts a damper on one’s tendency to overdo it.”
There’s a few compensations to getting on in years, to take some of the sting out of the aches-and-pains of advancing years. And one of them is figuring out what works for you, as opposed to what other folks think ought to work for you. At least that’s my take on it.