Losing The Electoral College: A Sure Path To Tyranny

BY Herschel Smith
4 years, 10 months ago

David Codrea:

If a “popular vote” replacement of the Electoral system is allowed to stand, you can kiss “legal” recognition of the right to keep and bear arms goodbye, as well as anything meaningful ever happening to stop the ongoing invasion of “pathway to citizenship”-bound foreign nationals into this country.

As I’ve said before, the GOP’ers want the Latinos because they want cheap labor.  The labor is cheap because they’ve set up a system of socialized medicine wherein the middle class has to provide medical care for themselves and everyone else, including immigrants.  So the cost of immigration is foist on the middle class, which they want to eviscerate.

Do you doubt any of this?

The Trump administration’s Department of Justice wants to eliminate all of Obamacare and drastically roll back access to healthcare. On Monday, the Trump DOJ announced that it will continue combating the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act, agreeing with a Texas federal judge’s ruling against sustaining the ACA on the basis of the GOP tax law changes in 2017. This decision to continue pushing for the repeal of the ACA is a clear signal that health care will be one of the top pressing issues in the upcoming 2020 election.

Beyond these efforts, however, there will be disastrous consequences if the law is eliminated. According to the Urban Institute’s 2019 analysis of the potential consequences of the full repeal of the ACA, an estimated 20 million people would immediately lose health care coverage, and health care spending would decrease in states where coverage rates had increased the most via the ACA.

Latinos in particular made the biggest gains in access to insurance under Obamacare over the last six years.

That’s one big reason they vote democratic by 75%-80%.  As for the issue of gun control, we’ve discussed that before at length, and the statistics match almost precisely with what the numbers of supplied.

Of course, while the GOP elitists want to line the pockets of their fellow members of the BoD of various corporations with cheap labor, the democrats want the voters.  That’s why nothing can stop this.  It is inevitable.  North Carolina was close in the last election, and Florida was a razor’s edge.

Texas will likely go blue this election or next, and Georgia is heading that way.  But lose Florida or Texas and it’s over for any resemblance of constitutional conservatism in America for this generation and the next.

I realize this may be a bit far afield from David’s main point (the electoral college), but not really so much.  The Latino population weighs big in states like New Mexico, Texas, Florida and California.  What’s going to happen if we lose the electoral college and the popular vote is all that matters?


Comments

  1. On May 24, 2019 at 6:20 am, ragman said:

    Since the Electoral College is part of the Constitution wouldn’t any change require a constitutional amendment? Gun registration and confiscation is coming, at least it’s going to be attempted. Gun grabbers could care less about our ability to protect ourselves and our families. They want to take away our ability to resist the tyranny that will certainly result if we become a true democracy. How we will react to this is the real question.

  2. On May 24, 2019 at 7:02 am, Heywood said:

    @ragman. The Constitution only dictates that the states send electors. It doesn’t specifically state how they are apportioned.

  3. On May 24, 2019 at 7:24 am, ragman said:

    Correct, but they must still send them and from what I understand the electors can vote for whoever they want. Please correct me if I’m wrong.

  4. On May 24, 2019 at 7:53 am, Heywood said:

    @ragman. Nope, you are correct. Remember in 2016 they were trying to get them to cast votes for someone other than Trump. However, you know damn well they aren’t going to send anyone who will rock the boat. We all know this wasn’t the intent of the Electoral College, but intent be damned according to libtards (see 2A for further proof). Constitutionally IMHO, we don’t have a leg to stand on. Nebraska and Maine already split their votes. I don’t know whether it has been challenged or not.

  5. On May 24, 2019 at 8:42 am, Bob said:

    Remember, Florida allowed felons to vote. That’s 1.5 million extra voters. How many will vote democrat? Trump only won Florida by 113,000 votes.

    If Florida is the only state that flips, he might be fine. How likely is that?

  6. On May 24, 2019 at 9:48 am, scott s. said:

    The USCONS gives state LEGISLATURES the power to “appoint” electors. Previous USSC decisions have stated the legislature’s power is “plenary”. The legislature sets the place where the electors shall give their votes.

    In my state, state law determines how electors are appointed. Electors are voted for by party. The law states how a party qualifies to have electors, also a provision for how non-parties can qualify electors for the ballot. The law provides that the name of the party’s nominee for president and vice president appear on the ballot, but that’s for convenience. Each party provides lists of electors and alternates to the Governor. When the election results are certified, the winning party’s electors are notified to convene in Honolulu for the vote. The law states they must vote for the nominee of their party (with the USCONS restriction on the state of residence of the Pres and Vice Pres). The votes for Pres and Vice Pres are compiled and delivered to the Governor who then transmits the documents to Washington. We haven’t had a so-called “faithless elector” issue so I don’t know what would happen if an elector did not follow the law.

    Note that there were complaints about popular voting irregularities in the 1840 presidential election and moreso in 1844 which resulted in Congress mandating that the canvass be held on the same day throughout the country beginning with the 1848 election. The timing of Tues in Nov was due to South Carolina until the civil war had its legislature directly elect the electors so the vote had to be timed for when its legislature was in session.

    Since the civil war popular election has been used for electors, except in 1876 the Republican congress made a deal with the Colorado territorial legislature that Colorado would be admitted as a state if the Colo legislature would elect the electors. Those 3 electors gave the edge to Hayes in an election with many other irregularities over how electors would be appointed (or more accurately, who would determine if the electors were valid).

    Also, it wasn’t until the election of 1872 that the US representatives were voted for on the same day (Senators of course were a matter for the legislature, not a popular vote until Amendment XVII).

  7. On May 24, 2019 at 9:49 am, Chris Mallory said:

    The Constitution gives state legislatures (SL) total and complete authority to determine how electors are selected. Article 2 Section 1 Clause 2. The SL can decide to allow state residents to vote. The SL can decide to nominate electors by vote of the SL. This was the option used by many of the states after the nation was founded. It wasn’t until the 1870’s that all states allowed state citizens to vote to determine electors. Theoretically, a SL could select electors by a chicken crapping on a grid.

    As for the electors voting for who ever they want, it depends on state law. 29 states have laws punishing “faithless electors” or requiring electors to vote as directed.

    So people try to use the Constitutional requirement that interstate compacts must be approved by Congress as a way to derail this. But in 1893 Virginia vs. Tennessee, the Supreme Court held that congressional approval was only required in cases where the state compact trespassed upon Federal authority. Since the Constitution gives state legislatures the authority to determine how to select electors no Federal authority is involved.

  8. On May 24, 2019 at 10:27 am, Fred said:

    Scott and Chris, although it is understood what you meant, the US Constitution ‘gives’ nothing to the states or to the people. The States specifically enumerated their reserving to themselves the manner in which electors are…blah blah blah.

    What a road we’ve traveled to get here. It’s disheartening.

  9. On May 24, 2019 at 11:23 am, TheAlaskan said:

    The partitioning of America begins…

  10. On May 24, 2019 at 12:30 pm, Georgiaboy61 said:

    The real issue at hand is the constant cheating of the Democrats/Left and their ceaseless attempted end-runs around our laws, customs and practices pertaining to the vote.

    Around 1960, when the U.S. was a much more traditional nation than it is now, the political left took stock of its status in American life and did not like what it saw – a country full of traditional Americans of European stock who tended to vote Republican and who even, in significant numbers, still attended church.

    Rather than reform their party and ideology to enhance their appeal to a greater number of voters, the Left instead decided to “fire” the electorate, and appoint a new one in its place.

    With the passage of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, the Left sensed that conditions were right for their gambit, and the result was the 1965 Immigration & Naturalization Act, also known as the Hart-Celler Act, after the last names of its two principle Congressional authors, both Democrats.

    Historically, the U.S. – being a nation of European origins – has always favored European immigrants as citizens-to-be, while allowing in others from various other nations and regions around the world. Hart-Celler turned that policy upside down, now granting immigration priority to non-Europeans ahead of would-be Americans from Europe.

    Today, fifty years since Hart-Celler, its effects are readily apparent, even to those who don’t follow politics, or know 1960s history.

    Rigging the game in their favor in the arena of legal immigration still wasn’t enough for the Left, who then ramped up their efforts to bring more illegal aliens – whom they call “undocumented immigrants” – into the country.

    Neither major political party did much to stop them, since each had its own reasons for wanting more illegals here. Public opinion – which has shown consistently for decades that ordinary Americans want this problem fixed – was ignored, or if comment was made by the political class, it was only around election time to get the proles to dig into their wallets one more time. After getting re-elected, that Congressman or Senator resumed his/her disdain for the issue, going back to ignoring it completely.

    There is a third leg to this triad of corruption: Registering people to vote illegally, or otherwise breaking election laws, i.e., multiple votes cast by the same person, individuals voting out of district, fraudulent voter registration (“dead men voting”), and similar scams designed to stuff ballot boxes in their favor.

    Again, the establishment GOP has done nothing but wring its hands. They have been worse-than-useless.

    Viewed in light of this history of lawlessness where the vote is concerned, we ought not to be too surprised at this latest ploy. The Left, like rust, never sleeps.

  11. On May 24, 2019 at 1:22 pm, Chris Mallory said:

    Ok, Fred, you don’t like the word “gives”.

    “Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector.”

    Do you like “reserves” better? How about “protects”? The quoted clause specifically singles out this authority as belonging to the state legislatures. You are straining at gnats while swallowing a camel.

  12. On May 24, 2019 at 2:55 pm, Fred said:

    Chris, please don’t take it personally. It matters because the People created the States and the General Government. When a young person hears or learns that the Constitution gives positive rights to the states or the people, it’s a short hop for them to communism. It is the people that own(ed) everything and grant to the States and to the General Government certain enumerated, delegated powers, over which the States and Feds are thereby given authority, and NO OTHERS. The use of the word ‘gives’ infers that all power rests with the government and we are its subjects.

    So, no, the Constitution, and therefore the government does not give, confer, grant, allow, or permit, or any type or types of thing or condition to the States or to the People. And obviously, the Constitution “protects” nothing, or we wouldn’t be in this mess. The Constitution is nothing but a legal framework, a covenant, by which we live, the General Government having broken the covenant by permission of the people and acquiescence of the states, we are now returning to God’s Natural Law, LORD help us all. There is a higher law. God save us.

    The chain of command as indicated in the Constitution:
    God at the head
    The people
    The States
    The General Government, with very limited authorities, in service to the above

    This has been flipped on it’s head by decades, yay, centuries of bad teaching and power mad sociopaths to the point where a sentence that includes ‘the Constitution gives the states…’ just rolls right off of the tongue.

    It is the people who ‘give’ and where they fail to ‘protect; their governments then run amok.

    See the King James Holy Bible, Magna Carta (not a big fan), Locke, Jefferson, etc.

  13. On May 24, 2019 at 3:56 pm, moe mensale said:

    “Remember, Florida allowed felons to vote. That’s 1.5 million extra voters. How many will vote democrat? Trump only won Florida by 113,000 votes.”

    @Bob,

    That’s quite an open ended statement. The felon vote was just passed in Nov 2018 and became effective in Jan 2019. 1.5 million felons haven’t cast any votes yet. And most of them probably will not avail themselves of that right. Why? Because they have to make financial restitution as well as pay any court ordered fees and fines. Also, murderers and sexual offenders are not eligible. Only 2,000+ felons signed up for their restored right in the first 3 months of 2019. Additionally, there’s a new bill awaiting Gov DeSantis’ signature that would further narrow which felons are eligible.

    https://www.cbsnews.com/news/florida-felons-won-back-right-to-vote-new-bill-might-limit-who-can-cast-ballot-2019-05-23/

  14. On May 24, 2019 at 6:41 pm, Georgiaboy61 said:

    Felons voting isn’t the only outrage the Democrats/Left are contemplating. More than one prominent Democrat has speculated publicly about lowering the voting age to sixteen. Why on earth would this be contemplated? Because the young are more-likely than the old to vote Democrat….

  15. On May 24, 2019 at 6:46 pm, Bob said:

    My comment is obviously about 2020. The clue is the word “will”.

    I’m glad it’s not as dire as it could be, but you’re making big assumptions. You’re assuming the 2k who registered is representative of election-season registration levels. You’re assuming the bill will be signed, though we’ll find that out soon.

    Do you know how many of the felons are murderers or sex offenders?

  16. On May 24, 2019 at 8:20 pm, Gryphon said:

    What makes Anyone Think that “Voting” can Change the ‘system’? Seriously? It has been a 1-Party (the Party of Money) for more than a Century now, when the Congress was Bought and the President Blackmailed into allowing a Private, (jew-owned) International Corporation to “Print Money” (not “Coin Money” as the Constitution Requires).

    The ORIGINAL “Constitution” was Dissolved by the Secession of a number of States, and the subsequent ‘constituion’ was a product of Corruption, and imposed upon the Seceded States by Military Occupation. what is called the “constitution” Today are the ‘articles of incorporation’ of a Private Corporation doing business as “THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA”.
    This Corporation went Bankrupt in 1933, and since then has been Operated by the (((Creditors))) for (((their))) private Benefit.

    Want to Know More? Look up what Congressman James Trafficant had to Say about the Subject, and for Reference look for the “Financial Emergency Act of 1933”, the Declaration of Bankruptcy by the ‘congress’ and the subsequent Turnover of ALL ASSETS OF THE NATION to the (((creditors))).

    (Clue) Why do you have to Pay Taxes on “Property”? YOU DON’T OWN IT, THE (((banks))) DO.

  17. On May 24, 2019 at 10:46 pm, Fred said:

    Now that’s a good explanation, thanks Gryphon.

  18. On May 25, 2019 at 12:07 pm, DAN III said:

    Gryphon @ 2020,

    Thanks for your informative comment. Very good.

  19. On May 25, 2019 at 1:10 pm, moe mensale said:

    @Bob,

    “My comment is obviously about 2020. The clue is the word “will”.”

    It’s not obvious. You excluded any dates. Most people have no idea when this ballot initiative was passed.

    “I’m glad it’s not as dire as it could be, but you’re making big assumptions. You’re assuming the 2k who registered is representative of election-season registration levels. You’re assuming the bill will be signed, though we’ll find that out soon.”

    I didn’t say the 2,000 was a run rate. Let’s be realistic. 1.5 million felons aren’t going to show up at the polls in 2020. Remember, the felon’s sentence must be fully completed in order for him to be legally eligible to vote. That means jail time, probation and any court ordered restitution. It could take years for all 1.5 million to become eligible. Then there’s the unknown factor of how many of them really care if they can or can’t vote. 10%? 50%? 100%? I don’t think anyone has a good handle on this.

    I’m not assuming DeSantis will sign it. The FL House and Senate are. DeSantis has stated publicly that he will. It’s on his desk. He has a week left to do so.

    “Do you know how many of the felons are murderers or sex offenders?”

    I have no idea.

  20. On May 25, 2019 at 11:15 pm, Jaque said:

    The people of the United States are only an election away from turning our Republic Marxist. All the fuzes have been placed and lit. They are burning now. And with the Marxist government comes the Marxist doctrine – and the end of civilian firearm possession. Ammunition and reloading materials will also be banned. Many other liberties will end. Taxation will be oppressive to the middle class and above. All the vectors are in alignment for the move to Marxism. The bums of the Marxist party are broadcasting their intent. A large amount of Americans have become soft, mushy, lazy, greedy, welfare sucking bums. The Marxists will enlist the rapidly expanding population of illegals for their votes. Dark days are ahead.

    I think its time that the patriots in American society need to be quietly preparing for a resistance movement. Very quietly as Red Flag laws will be used heavily. It wouldn’t surprise me if the Marxist Regime uses United Nations troops to enforce is gun controls should the peoples resistance become heavy. The Declaration of Independence lays the groundwork for a peoples resistance. It was effective once, and should be effective again. The six million dollar question is are there enough patriots able and willing to stand up for the Republic and oppose the Marxists. A significant number of Civilian, Law Enforcement, Military and the Republican Party will all need to resist.

  21. On May 26, 2019 at 2:18 am, Georgiaboy61 said:

    @Jaque

    The question is one of leaving alone or not leaving alone. Most trad-Americans want only to live out their lives in peace, left to own devices. Those who interfere can’t live with this, and so contrive to interfere and intervene in the lives of those who wish to be left alone. The circle of self-determination in which a traditional American lives grows smaller and smaller by the day…. will it grow so small that the American in question will finally rolled up his sleeves and get to taking care of business, well, your guess is as good as mine.

  22. On May 28, 2019 at 2:13 am, Dan said:

    The goal of the left is total and complete control over everyone and everything. This requires COMPLETE control of the Executive Branch…..
    FOREVER. And THAT is the reason for this attempt to eliminate the
    Electoral College restraint on what is called “The Tyranny Of The Majority”.
    The intention is to insure that the Commie Demonrat party NEVER LOSES AN ELECTION FOR THE PRESIDENCY EVER AGAIN.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment


You are currently reading "Losing The Electoral College: A Sure Path To Tyranny", entry #21305 on The Captain's Journal.

This article is filed under the category(s) Immigration and was published May 23rd, 2019 by Herschel Smith.

If you're interested in what else the The Captain's Journal has to say, you might try thumbing through the archives and visiting the main index, or; perhaps you would like to learn more about TCJ.

26th MEU (10)
Abu Muqawama (12)
ACOG (2)
ACOGs (1)
Afghan National Army (36)
Afghan National Police (17)
Afghanistan (704)
Afghanistan SOFA (4)
Agriculture in COIN (3)
AGW (1)
Air Force (40)
Air Power (10)
al Qaeda (83)
Ali al-Sistani (1)
America (22)
Ammunition (275)
Animals (280)
Ansar al Sunna (15)
Anthropology (3)
Antonin Scalia (1)
AR-15s (372)
Arghandab River Valley (1)
Arlington Cemetery (2)
Army (86)
Assassinations (2)
Assault Weapon Ban (28)
Australian Army (7)
Azerbaijan (4)
Backpacking (2)
Badr Organization (8)
Baitullah Mehsud (21)
Basra (17)
BATFE (217)
Battle of Bari Alai (2)
Battle of Wanat (18)
Battle Space Weight (3)
Bin Laden (7)
Blogroll (3)
Blogs (24)
Body Armor (23)
Books (3)
Border War (18)
Brady Campaign (1)
Britain (38)
British Army (35)
Camping (5)
Canada (17)
Castle Doctrine (1)
Caucasus (6)
CENTCOM (7)
Center For a New American Security (8)
Charity (3)
China (16)
Christmas (16)
CIA (30)
Civilian National Security Force (3)
Col. Gian Gentile (9)
Combat Outposts (3)
Combat Video (2)
Concerned Citizens (6)
Constabulary Actions (3)
Coolness Factor (3)
COP Keating (4)
Corruption in COIN (4)
Council on Foreign Relations (1)
Counterinsurgency (218)
DADT (2)
David Rohde (1)
Defense Contractors (2)
Department of Defense (210)
Department of Homeland Security (26)
Disaster Preparedness (5)
Distributed Operations (5)
Dogs (15)
Donald Trump (27)
Drone Campaign (4)
EFV (3)
Egypt (12)
El Salvador (1)
Embassy Security (1)
Enemy Spotters (1)
Expeditionary Warfare (17)
F-22 (2)
F-35 (1)
Fallujah (17)
Far East (3)
Fathers and Sons (2)
Favorite (1)
Fazlullah (3)
FBI (39)
Featured (189)
Federal Firearms Laws (18)
Financing the Taliban (2)
Firearms (1,758)
Football (1)
Force Projection (35)
Force Protection (4)
Force Transformation (1)
Foreign Policy (27)
Fukushima Reactor Accident (6)
Ganjgal (1)
Garmsir (1)
general (15)
General Amos (1)
General James Mattis (1)
General McChrystal (44)
General McKiernan (6)
General Rodriguez (3)
General Suleimani (9)
Georgia (19)
GITMO (2)
Google (1)
Gulbuddin Hekmatyar (1)
Gun Control (1,630)
Guns (2,298)
Guns In National Parks (3)
Haditha Roundup (10)
Haiti (2)
HAMAS (7)
Haqqani Network (9)
Hate Mail (8)
Hekmatyar (1)
Heroism (4)
Hezbollah (12)
High Capacity Magazines (16)
High Value Targets (9)
Homecoming (1)
Homeland Security (3)
Horses (2)
Humor (72)
Hunting (31)
ICOS (1)
IEDs (7)
Immigration (104)
India (10)
Infantry (4)
Information Warfare (4)
Infrastructure (4)
Intelligence (23)
Intelligence Bulletin (6)
Iran (171)
Iraq (379)
Iraq SOFA (23)
Islamic Facism (64)
Islamists (98)
Israel (19)
Jaish al Mahdi (21)
Jalalabad (1)
Japan (3)
Jihadists (81)
John Nagl (5)
Joint Intelligence Centers (1)
JRTN (1)
Kabul (1)
Kajaki Dam (1)
Kamdesh (9)
Kandahar (12)
Karachi (7)
Kashmir (2)
Khost Province (1)
Khyber (11)
Knife Blogging (7)
Korea (4)
Korengal Valley (3)
Kunar Province (20)
Kurdistan (3)
Language in COIN (5)
Language in Statecraft (1)
Language Interpreters (2)
Lashkar-e-Taiba (2)
Law Enforcement (6)
Lawfare (14)
Leadership (6)
Lebanon (6)
Leon Panetta (2)
Let Them Fight (2)
Libya (14)
Lines of Effort (3)
Littoral Combat (8)
Logistics (50)
Long Guns (1)
Lt. Col. Allen West (2)
Marine Corps (280)
Marines in Bakwa (1)
Marines in Helmand (67)
Marjah (4)
MEDEVAC (2)
Media (67)
Medical (146)
Memorial Day (6)
Mexican Cartels (41)
Mexico (61)
Michael Yon (6)
Micromanaging the Military (7)
Middle East (1)
Military Blogging (26)
Military Contractors (5)
Military Equipment (25)
Militia (9)
Mitt Romney (3)
Monetary Policy (1)
Moqtada al Sadr (2)
Mosul (4)
Mountains (25)
MRAPs (1)
Mullah Baradar (1)
Mullah Fazlullah (1)
Mullah Omar (3)
Musa Qala (4)
Music (25)
Muslim Brotherhood (6)
Nation Building (2)
National Internet IDs (1)
National Rifle Association (95)
NATO (15)
Navy (30)
Navy Corpsman (1)
NCOs (3)
News (1)
NGOs (3)
Nicholas Schmidle (2)
Now Zad (19)
NSA (3)
NSA James L. Jones (6)
Nuclear (62)
Nuristan (8)
Obama Administration (221)
Offshore Balancing (1)
Operation Alljah (7)
Operation Khanjar (14)
Ossetia (7)
Pakistan (165)
Paktya Province (1)
Palestine (5)
Patriotism (7)
Patrolling (1)
Pech River Valley (11)
Personal (72)
Petraeus (14)
Pictures (1)
Piracy (13)
Pistol (4)
Pizzagate (21)
Police (647)
Police in COIN (3)
Policy (15)
Politics (969)
Poppy (2)
PPEs (1)
Prisons in Counterinsurgency (12)
Project Gunrunner (20)
PRTs (1)
Qatar (1)
Quadrennial Defense Review (2)
Quds Force (13)
Quetta Shura (1)
RAND (3)
Recommended Reading (14)
Refueling Tanker (1)
Religion (491)
Religion and Insurgency (19)
Reuters (1)
Rick Perry (4)
Rifles (1)
Roads (4)
Rolling Stone (1)
Ron Paul (1)
ROTC (1)
Rules of Engagement (75)
Rumsfeld (1)
Russia (37)
Sabbatical (1)
Sangin (1)
Saqlawiyah (1)
Satellite Patrols (2)
Saudi Arabia (4)
Scenes from Iraq (1)
Second Amendment (667)
Second Amendment Quick Hits (2)
Secretary Gates (9)
Sharia Law (3)
Shura Ittehad-ul-Mujahiden (1)
SIIC (2)
Sirajuddin Haqqani (1)
Small Wars (72)
Snipers (9)
Sniveling Lackeys (2)
Soft Power (4)
Somalia (8)
Sons of Afghanistan (1)
Sons of Iraq (2)
Special Forces (28)
Squad Rushes (1)
State Department (23)
Statistics (1)
Sunni Insurgency (10)
Support to Infantry Ratio (1)
Supreme Court (52)
Survival (185)
SWAT Raids (57)
Syria (38)
Tactical Drills (38)
Tactical Gear (14)
Taliban (168)
Taliban Massing of Forces (4)
Tarmiyah (1)
TBI (1)
Technology (21)
Tehrik-i-Taliban (78)
Terrain in Combat (1)
Terrorism (96)
Thanksgiving (13)
The Anbar Narrative (23)
The Art of War (5)
The Fallen (1)
The Long War (20)
The Surge (3)
The Wounded (13)
Thomas Barnett (1)
Transnational Insurgencies (5)
Tribes (5)
TSA (24)
TSA Ineptitude (13)
TTPs (4)
U.S. Border Patrol (6)
U.S. Border Security (18)
U.S. Sovereignty (23)
UAVs (2)
UBL (4)
Ukraine (10)
Uncategorized (98)
Universal Background Check (3)
Unrestricted Warfare (4)
USS Iwo Jima (2)
USS San Antonio (1)
Uzbekistan (1)
V-22 Osprey (4)
Veterans (3)
Vietnam (1)
War & Warfare (412)
War & Warfare (41)
War Movies (4)
War Reporting (21)
Wardak Province (1)
Warriors (6)
Waziristan (1)
Weapons and Tactics (79)
West Point (1)
Winter Operations (1)
Women in Combat (21)
WTF? (1)
Yemen (1)

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006

about · archives · contact · register

Copyright © 2006-2024 Captain's Journal. All rights reserved.