Hillary Clinton, Pedophile And Child Kidnapping Ring, And Endorsement Of Trump

BY Herschel Smith
7 months, 3 weeks ago

Unfortunately this has been a long time coming and there is water over the dam.  I have a history on the issue of Ted Cruz, Donald Trump and this election that readers may remember, and why I have changed my position needs some explaining.  So let’s get right to it.

Six months ago I bid farewell to politics.  It had nothing whatsoever to do with Trump or his moral indiscretions.  It had everything to do with the eviction of Christian thought from the GOP.  The alt-right is welcome in the GOP, I am not.  The obscene pervert Milo is a friend of the current staple of politics on the right, mine has gone the way of the Dodo bird.  This election cycle has managed to do what the progressives couldn’t do in a hundred years, i.e., separate Christians from any party at all and relegate our views to the trash heap of history, at least, as far as the eye can see, notwithstanding a sovereign God who rules all things and can revive the country if He chooses to.  I would never vote for any other candidate of which I’m aware, but I couldn’t vote for Donald Trump.

Ted Cruz isn’t perfect, and I’ve cataloged some of my disagreements with him, including his idiotic opposition to sentencing reform for drug and non-violent offenders advocated by Mike Lee.  But I’ve also cataloged his leadership, described by Louie Gohmert, to kill the gang of eight bill.  You may have a lawless president, but you don’t have a gang of eight bill today because of Ted Cruz.  Furthermore, I know his world view because I share his Christian faith.  He isn’t perfect, and neither am I.  But he was my choice.

South Carolina broke my heart.  But she was only a harbinger for what was to come, and I knew it was over at that point.  I couldn’t bring myself to be involved in much of anything regarding politics.  But things have changed, and I now fully endorse Donald Trump for president.  The voter I heard from South Carolina after the primary made me think for a long while.  She said, “We ain’t electin’ no preacher, we are electin’ a president!”  We’ll call this woman “Ms. dumbass.”

Ms. Dumbass doesn’t understand, but it isn’t her fault, at least not completely.  I was never concerned about the character of Trump.  I was concerned about the lack of the world view associated with being a Christian.  I reject out of hand the obscene, stupid and insulting phrase “co-religionist.”  You don’t get to do a few things like a Muslim and declare yourself a Christian (John 3:8).  It involves a change of heart, and then quite out of your control and necessarily, a change of world and life view over time.

The typical Southern Baptist preacher today says a few nicey-nice things and then has a come to Jesus moment, and then the congregants put on their idiotic costumes and cheers for their favorite band of perverts and criminals giving each other concussions.  Contra this, Rousas J. Rushdoony has said that the place for both theology and philosophy is in the pulpit.  The notion that God is deaf, dumb and mute when it comes to criminal justice, monetary policy, state law, waging war, art, science and music is ridiculous.  Constructing a consistent, holistic world and life view takes a lifetime.  Ms. Dumbass had divorced her faith from her worldview because she hasn’t been taught.  Much of the blame for where we are today lies with ignorant preaching.

Donald Trump may not have a consistent world and life view, or one that comports with my own in every way.  But the expulsion of such a world view from the GOP isn’t his fault.  Nor is it the fault of the establishment.  The voters put us squarely where we are.  Donald Trump isn’t a solution to the problem since he didn’t cause it.  Ms. Dumbass cannot fix it because she is too stupid and ignorant.  Ignorant because she hasn’t been taught, stupid because she opens her mouth in her ignorance.

But what Mr. Trump can indeed do is serve as justice and retribution for the evil and savagery inside the cabal inhabited by the Clintons and their ilk.  I have studied over time the evil, wickedness and designs for destruction that controls their every thought and action.  Take for instance this reddit thread on one Podesta email exchange on “spirit cooking” (h/t to my second son Joseph).  No, he isn’t having dinner with someone.  Read the thread and watch the video on what spirit cooking is.  These guys are Satanists into the occult.  This is one of hundreds of such threads put together by the “autists” at reddit and 4chan.  When is the bomb going to drop?  Is has been for four or five months now.  The MSM won’t cover it.

And now let’s get to one of the worst issues we could imagine (I truly hate to send you to things like this – these people are sickening and disgusting).  Up until today when my oldest son Joshua sent me this thread, I had doubted the implications of the Clinton’s involvement in a kidnapping and pedophilia ring.  Not any more.  Read this discussion thread at reddit (again, I’m sorry to send you to gross things like this, but the autistics at reddit are doing everyone’s job for them).  No one else will cover this sort of thing because it’s too dark and wicked.

They have connected a convicted child abductor who was caught stealing children from Haiti to the Clintons.  There is way, way more than this.  For example, there is this.

Hi John,

The realtor found a handkerchief (I think it has a map that seems pizza-related. Is it yorus? They can send it if you want. I know you’re busy, so feel free not to respond if it’s not yours or you don’t want it.

Susaner

A pizza related map on a handkerchief.  Who writes emails like that?  So the redditors tear off into the word “pizza” and show fairly conclusively that it refers to pedophilia.  No wonder Haiti’s prime minister referred to sex trafficking in this video.

Folks, I have over 4 Gigabytes of emails in my inbox.  I don’t ever delete anything.  I’ve been exchanging email at work for 35 years.  I’ve never written anything like a “pizza related map on a handkerchief.”  Moreover, if I did, my manager would have me sent to for-cause drug testing to see if I was fit for duty.  Who writes things like this?  No one.  No one does, unless you’re trying to hide something.

The Clinton’s are at the epicenter of a Satanic cabal that sells influence for money, exchanges power for power, sells children, exploits the weakest among us, abuses people, sexually molests imprisoned children, engages in the occult, and wants a world without borders with no remaining vestiges of sovereignty or liberty.  God uses all sorts of things to judge the wicked, and Donald Trump may very well be that judgment upon His enemies, at least for the moment.  In the end they will suffer eternally.

This has been a long, hard road for me, and I don’t need any guff from readers about why it took me so long.  My world and life view constrains my conscience, and I am told to “take every thought captive” for Christ.  But in this case my conscience is clear.  Hillary Clinton cannot be president.  Or at least, I must do what I can to prevent that from happening, and prepare for the worst if it does.  To be sure, Hillary will be death to gun rights and other such liberties, but don’t see those liberties in a vacuum.  She will be death to them because of her consistent world view, one that destroys, hates and devours at the behest of the evil one.  Lucifer whispers in her ear.

Trackbacks & Pingbacks


Comments

  1. On November 4, 2016 at 6:36 am, Josh said:

  2. On November 4, 2016 at 8:30 am, Fred said:

    Linked on #Gab.ai

    @ProGunFred
    #2A

  3. On November 4, 2016 at 8:32 am, Frank_in_Spokane said:

    Herschel,
    Two Qs:
    1. Post- or A-?
    2. I wouldn’t be surprised that the Clintonistas are involved in sex trafficking, But Teh Donuld is but a few steps behind them:

  4. On November 4, 2016 at 9:23 am, Dale Day said:

    Desperation! Attack, deny, divert – the Leftist war cry

  5. On November 4, 2016 at 9:32 am, Frank_in_Spokane said:

    Uhh, yeah.

    I’m a Christian conservo-libertarian. I’m voting for the Constitution Party’s Darrell Castle. Read the preamble to their platform here: http://www.constitutionparty.com/preamble/

    “Leftist.” [eyeroll]

  6. On November 4, 2016 at 9:36 pm, joefour said:

    I’ve voted for the Constitution Party in the past … but they have NO chance to win or effect post-election politics or the direction of the country. Hold your nose, close your eyes….vote for Trump!

  7. On November 7, 2016 at 1:17 pm, Frank_in_Spokane said:

    I don’t vote based on who I think has a chance to win. I vote based on who I think best represents the biblical values I espouse.

    (Besides, I live in WA. The Trump campaign isn’t spending a dime here — they’ve conceded the state to Hillary.)

  8. On November 7, 2016 at 5:14 pm, joefour said:

    Godspeed, Frank …

  9. On November 5, 2016 at 8:32 am, Old Salt said:

    No, you are voting for Clinton.

  10. On November 5, 2016 at 8:45 am, Old Salt said:

    .. and what will your wonderful Christian conscience tell you to disapprove of after the courts are packed and the law of the land is utterly severed from any Christian, let alone traditional, moral principle. If you think the ever-shifting morality of the Clinton state will allow you to worship in peace in “Spokane” you are mistaken. You shall be made to deny your conscience. Enjoy your 5 seconds of moral superiority on Tuesday.

  11. On November 7, 2016 at 1:22 pm, Frank_in_Spokane said:

    As you wish, Salty …

  12. On November 5, 2016 at 9:32 pm, Gary Goodwin said:

    Why don’t you stay home and not vote…it’s the same!

  13. On November 7, 2016 at 1:23 pm, Frank_in_Spokane said:

    You vote your way, I’ll vote mine. Mmmkay?

  14. On November 4, 2016 at 10:06 am, Fred said:

    Castle is the best candidate. Period. I however, have a responsibility
    to attempt to stop the coming (un)civil war. I will do this while
    holding my nose and voting trump. In the end it will only forestall the
    war. We are 2 different peoples, us Americans. May God forgive me.

  15. On November 4, 2016 at 10:42 am, Frank_in_Spokane said:

    “The duty is ours; the results are Gods.” ~ Howard Phillips (quoting one of the Founders — I forget which one)

    That said, I don’t judge you in the least for voting for Trump. The ones that drive me nuts are the fellow conservative Christians who condemn those of us who WON’T vote for him.

  16. On November 4, 2016 at 11:38 am, Josh said:

    Enjoy flushing your vote down the toilet.

    Just remember when HRC gets elected: YOU asked for this.

  17. On November 4, 2016 at 11:48 am, Archer said:

    Oh, good Lord….

    I’ve said it before, it is perfectly possible to be critical of Trump without supporting Hillary. Heck, I’m critical of Trump, and yet I’m still voting for him.

    Am I then asking for Hillary to be elected? My ballot says otherwise, schmuck.

  18. On November 4, 2016 at 12:02 pm, Josh said:

    You’ve confused yourself. We’re discussing the difference between VOTING for third party candidate, and VOTING for Trump. No one is talking about criticism except you.

    Actually, I don’t think you’re confused. You just created a straw man to beat up. Carry on.

  19. On November 4, 2016 at 1:41 pm, Frank_in_Spokane said:

    “when HRC gets elected: YOU asked for this”

    Even if I lived in a pure purple state and mine was the deciding vote, I still wouldn’t vote for Trump. I consider the man biblically unqualified FOR ME TO CHOOSE HIM as a national leader. (That’s not to say that God couldn’t USE him to His perfect purposes. But then, the same holds true for Hillary.)

    However, I live in WA. Bluer than blue, thanks to the counties west of the Cascades.

    The Trump campaign isn’t spending a dime here. They’ve conceded.

    And my vote for Castle isn’t the cause.

    Peace …

  20. On November 6, 2016 at 6:35 pm, Phil Ossiferz Stone said:

    Well, at least you’re an *honest* Good German.

  21. On November 7, 2016 at 1:25 pm, Frank_in_Spokane said:

    What does that even mean?an *honest* Good German”?

    What does that even mean?

  22. On November 4, 2016 at 11:47 am, Archer said:

    Really? The ones that drive me nuts are the ones who condemn us FOR voting for him.

    Y’know, the ones “voting their conscience” — in the short-term, anyway — by pulling the lever for Johnson (who is no friend of religious liberty) or writing in Ted Cruz (which while noble, has zero chance of actually winning).

    I’ve said many times, I don’t like Trump. He is not a moral man, lacking the fundamental moral compass that comes with a Christian world-view. But Hillary is 1000x worse; Trump may lack a compass, but Hillary doesn’t, and hers points 180 degrees opposite Christ’s and America’s. At this point in the election, one of the two of them will be the next President. The one lacking the compass CANNOT be worse than the one whose compass is diametrically opposed to ours.

    Put another way, Trump is a broken clock. He’s right sometimes, but looking at him you KNOW he’s broken. Hillary is a working clock set 6 hours ahead (or behind). She is NEVER right, but you can’t tell that just by looking; she possesses every appearance of a properly working clock. Who would you trust with the low-information voters? The one that is clearly broken (therefore must be handled with skepticism), or the one that appears to be in working order but is permanently set wrong?

  23. On November 4, 2016 at 1:53 pm, Frank_in_Spokane said:

    “The ones that drive me nuts are the ones who condemn us FOR voting for him.”

    Yeah, they’re a close second in my book.

    I don’t think a Christian has any place condemning another Christian for how they vote, or even WHETHER they vote.

    Re. Trump v. Clinton: I suspect Papa’s sent us (the American church) to our room to await a spanking. He will use the implement of His choice, and there’s no way for me to ameliorate the consequences of said spanking.

    Not least of all, by swapping His plywood paddle with a balsa substitute.

  24. On November 4, 2016 at 1:10 pm, Col. Douglas Mortimer said:

    I arrived at much the same place Fred. It’s like the 5 stages of grief. I’m going to hold my nose and as well and do it. I’ll probably show up to the voting booth with a clothespin on my nose.

  25. On November 4, 2016 at 11:41 am, Josh said:

    This is such a dumb comment. Claiming Trump is “mere steps behind” pedophilia, sex-trafficking, and demon worship because Howard Stern called his daughter a “piece of ass” and Trump says “Yeah.”

    How ludicrous. You sound like a CTR shill.

  26. On November 4, 2016 at 1:45 pm, Frank_in_Spokane said:

    As you wish.

    You vote your conscience, I’ll vote mine.

    And God will use them both to accomplish His perfect will.

    Peace.

    (BTW: “CTR”?)

  27. On November 5, 2016 at 1:13 am, Josh said:

    I’m sorry, Frank, but this has got to be the biggest cop-out ever. Why don’t you just let a rapist rape your family? They’ll be carrying out His perfect will, right?

    This worldview is so confused and confusing.

    CTR. Correct the Record. You know, the online psyops campaign funded to the tune of tens of millions of dollars by Saudi money run by the Clinton mafia? Or were you unaware? Some of us have been fighting this battle for months or longer.

    MAGA

  28. On November 7, 2016 at 1:21 pm, Frank_in_Spokane said:

    So you’re actually equating voting for a presidential candidate with not defending your family from a violent attacker?

    Talk about confused.

    No, I don’t know anything about CTR. Or MAGA. (I’m not even asking, because I don’t care.) Go and fight your battles.

  29. On November 4, 2016 at 1:46 pm, Herschel Smith said:

    See response below to Frank.

  30. On November 4, 2016 at 1:48 pm, Frank_in_Spokane said:

    ???

    You mean, your response to “RANDY MCCOOL”?

    How does that apply to me?

  31. On November 4, 2016 at 1:53 pm, Herschel Smith said:

    No. My response to Frank below. I’ll copy and paste.

    “I understand your viewpoint. But remember my point. I didn’t say, nor do I believe, that Trump is a way out of this, or that voting generally is a way out of this. It isn’t. Recovery will take the form of preacher-scholars who teach philosophy from the pulpit again.

    But what I do believe is that Trump will give us more time before we enter a period of extended darkness. Have you [edit: “fully”] bequeathed your world and life view to your children and grandchildren yet, or do you want more time? Do you have all the guns and ammunition you want yet, or do you want more time? As Mike Vanderboegh used to say, “I’m trying to give us more time.””

  32. On November 4, 2016 at 1:55 pm, Frank_in_Spokane said:

    Ahh, zo. (Different “Frank.”)

  33. On November 4, 2016 at 1:57 pm, Frank_in_Spokane said:

    “more time”

    I understand your perspective.

    I simply see things differently. (See my response to Archer re. the impending butt-whuppin’.)

  34. On November 4, 2016 at 1:58 pm, Frank_in_Spokane said:

    BTW, HS: Post-?

  35. On November 4, 2016 at 2:02 pm, Herschel Smith said:

    Well, I’ve never forced myself to an absolute conclusion one way or the other. I’ve read Chilton’s stuff and it seems convincing, but the one thing I have trouble with is that I know if Peter is right (and he is), Christians will always experience some form of persecution. This isn’t consistent with Post-.

    As to Revelation, I am a preterist. See Kenneth Gentry.

  36. On November 4, 2016 at 3:58 pm, Fred said:

    Such as Rev 11 (likely speaks to the recent dark ages ) in my view. When the American empire falls the world will likely fall into some new form of darker time. I would prefer (read: duty bound to attempt to prevent) to keep this from happening to our children.

  37. On November 4, 2016 at 9:22 am, Dale Day said:

    I’ve
    been seeing all sorts of references to this on the net for several
    days. A lot of it has to do with some emails released by WikiLeaks.
    But this am was the first time I saw directions to far more detailed
    information and links. To make things even worse, this also includes
    claims that Podesta and the Clintons are somehow linked to Satanic
    activities.

    We will
    certainly see the attacks, denials, and diversions so take the time
    to check these out for yourselves and determine their veracity.

  38. On November 4, 2016 at 10:14 am, Fred said:

    I have been saying for months now that Clinton is demon possessed. This is based on her wildly laughing about killing Qaddafi. Killing a man, any man, even one that needs killing, is serious businessmen, it is a grave matter, it is not funny. And since I don’t worship at the alter of the modern day witch doctors of psychiatry I dismiss words like pathological. I pray the LORD to remove that demon from our presence.

  39. On November 4, 2016 at 11:28 am, Randy McCool said:

    IT’S NOT ABOUT YOU CAPTAIN

  40. On November 4, 2016 at 1:38 pm, Herschel Smith said:

    I’m going to post my response assuming you are a Trump supporter. I think that’s a fairly safe assumption.

    I handed you an early Christmas present, wrapped up in nice paper, bow on it, delivered to your door, free of charge, no shipping or handling, and you’re too damn stupid to understand it because you’re an emotional yeller and screamer and keyboard pounder ALL IN CAPS (good Lord man, turn the CAPS key off).

    You see, it really WAS all about me. I had a history with my readers of support for Cruz and opposition to Trump. It was thoughtful, well developed, and based on a thoroughgoing Christian world and life view.

    So in this post I explained in detail my journey, how I came to the decision I did. Make no mistake about it. There are millions of Christians out there, just … like … me. Christians who haven’t made up their minds, or those who cannot bring themselves to vote for Trump.

    If you had a lick of sense, you would be hawking this post everywhere you could, social media, blogs, web sites, email, and so on – assuming you’re a Trump supporter. “You see,” says you, “Other thoughtful Christians have made this decision. You can too.”
    But you don’t, and you won’t.

  41. On November 4, 2016 at 11:41 am, Billy Mullins said:

    It doesn’t matter how many crimes the Clintons may have committed. I expect Obama to spend a boatload of time signing presidential pardons including theirs. Even if he loathes and despises the two of them, he knows very well how to spell arkancide and it doesn’t matter that he will have a Secret Service protective detail. Anyone can be gotten to. ANYONE!

  42. On November 4, 2016 at 11:50 am, Archer said:

    Something that’s been nagging at me: Can Obama sign a pardon for the Clintons?

    I thought they had to be convicted first.

  43. On November 4, 2016 at 12:49 pm, Billy Mullins said:

    My understanding is “yes”. Think back to Willy Jeff was leaving office. He pardoned some guy who was living overseas (somewhere without an extradition treaty) to keep from being arrested. The guy’s wife made some huge donation to the Clinton Foundation and on Willy Jeff’s last day (or so) he signed a pardon for the guy so he could come home.

  44. On November 4, 2016 at 1:58 pm, Herschel Smith said:

    Billy I think Hillary could do a child sacrifice to Molech on national TV, and the progs would still want her. You’re right. And she’ll get a pardon if it’s possible.

  45. On November 4, 2016 at 2:02 pm, Frank_in_Spokane said:

    Hah. Remember this boast from Teh Donuld?

    “I could stand in the middle of 5th Avenue and shoot somebody and I wouldn’t lose voters.” Donald Trump (at a Sioux Center IA campaign rally)

    http://www.cnn.com/2016/01/23/politics/donald-trump-shoot-somebody-support/

  46. On November 6, 2016 at 5:00 pm, Darin Sunny McCullough said:

    How about this email to Clinton DIRECTLY from an advisor…sorry, I may mention crossing my fingers or a rabbit’s foot, but “sacrificing to Moloch”? Um, no. Just no.

    https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/14333#efmAtfAvo

  47. On November 4, 2016 at 12:39 pm, Sando182 said:

    It comes down to this, for me:
    “The thing is, I’m not voting for Donald Trump to be my pal. I’m voting for him not to be Hillary. I’m going to vote for the imperfect vessel instead of the overflowing chamber pot.” – Kurt Schlichter

  48. On November 4, 2016 at 12:47 pm, Frank Clarke said:

    Such pragmaticism is exactly what has put us where we are today. And the GOP solution: Let’s do it again, but this time BIGGER!

    Talk to me in four years, and we’ll see how it has worked out… again.

  49. On November 4, 2016 at 1:44 pm, Herschel Smith said:

    I understand your viewpoint. But remember my point. I didn’t say, nor do I believe, that Trump is a way out of this, or that voting generally is a way out of this. It isn’t. Recovery will take the form of preacher-scholars who teach philosophy from the pulpit again.

    But what I do believe is that Trump will give us more time before we enter a period of extended darkness. Have you bequeathed your world and life view to your children and grandchildren yet, or do you want more time? Do you have all the guns and ammunition you want yet, or do you want more time? As Mike Vanderboegh used to say, “I’m trying to give us more time.”

  50. On November 5, 2016 at 7:24 am, Frank Clarke said:

    Your opportunity to gain more time passed in 2012 and 2008 and 2004 and 2000 and …

    You turned them all down. And you’re going to do it again.

  51. On November 4, 2016 at 2:42 pm, Sando182 said:

    I’m not happy about voting for him – he wasn’t even in the Top 15 candidates I would have supported.
    I just cannot support that hideous, morally bankrupt, corrupted, compromised woman.
    Given that one of them will win, I have to go with him.

  52. On November 5, 2016 at 7:30 am, Frank Clarke said:

    You (and Herschel) seem to think there is some substantive difference between Clinton and Trump, that one is –by whatever measure– less bad than the other. THAT is the error you have repeatedly made in the past and which you seem determined to repeat this year.

    There is no qualitative difference between evils. By despairing that you must choose one evil or another you doom us all.

    If we are to be doomed, let it not be by the hand of good men.

  53. On November 5, 2016 at 10:41 am, Sando182 said:

    “You (and Herschel) seem to think there is some substantive difference between Clinton and Trump, that one is –by whatever measure– less bad than the other.”
    Yep. Trump is IMO substantially better then Clinton. I don’t agree that he is evil either. I wish he weren’t the nominee but I’m now confronted with a binary choice – him or her. I’m going with him.

    YOU seem to be ignoring this reality.

  54. On November 5, 2016 at 11:54 am, Josh said:

    Frank. Come on. Let’s be real. Let us not talk falsely now, as the thief says.

    Donald Trump is no “eviler” than you, as you admit in your opening sentence. Are we only to elect perfect men?

    There is a STAGGERING difference between electing a secularist who promises to safeguard your worldview’s place in your government – this is Trump, and casting any other vote or no-vote or third-party vote for Clinton, who’s husband claims she communes with spirits, has surrounded herself by a cabal of demon worshippers, and looks at the cusp of being at the epicenter of a massive exposé on treasonous, disgusting, dispicable, dark, truly evil practices by our world elite.

    Clinton and her ilk have been waging direct war on everything you hold dear for fifty years. Will you really not cast a vote against her? That seems vain, sir.

  55. On November 7, 2016 at 5:08 pm, Frank_in_Spokane said:

    “a secularist who promises to safeguard your worldview’s place in your government”

    Oh, he “promises,” does he? Ask the three Mrs. Trumps the street value of this man’s “promises.”

    He “promises.” And you believe him.

    How cute.

  56. On November 4, 2016 at 2:51 pm, Ned Weatherby said:

    I’m also voting for Trump. I have previously written scathing comments regarding Trump on this site.

    I won’t vote for the truly stupid Libertarian candidate, and I see a vote for Trump as an attempt to keep Hillary out. Besides, at this point, if she’s voted in, and is still being investigated, I believe that she is enough of a psychopath to nuke the whole world if she fears that she is going down. So no – I won’t vote for a third party.

  57. On November 4, 2016 at 3:04 pm, SSG Mac said:

    Sir,
    I traveled the same path, to the same conclusion long ago. Cruz was my man, I would never have advocated Trump; except as an alternative to HRC. No guff from me: it’s a bitter pill.

  58. On November 4, 2016 at 5:28 pm, joefour said:

    For more on the latest e-mails and the code words used to describe various sexual perversities see the following link (heads up — not for the faint of heart) …

    http://www.newnationalist.net/2016/11/04/latest-wikileaks-trove-is-rife-with-eyes-wide-shut-sexual-perversion-references/

  59. On November 4, 2016 at 5:56 pm, Herschel Smith said:

    Good grief.

  60. On November 4, 2016 at 6:37 pm, joefour said:

    “Good grief.”

    I know….the Clintons are nothing but a criminal enterprise that is surrounded and, to this point, still protected by… pure, unadulterated evil.

    I hope Trump gets elected and really does whatever it takes to “Drain the swamp!” … In that regard, rumour has it that Trey Gowdy is on the short list to be Trump’s Attorney General … if there is a better man out there to be Attorney General, I don’t know who that might be ….

  61. On November 4, 2016 at 8:14 pm, Herschel Smith said:

    Trey Gowdy as AG. Now wouldn’t that be a hoot and a half? Imagine the changes that would occur within the DOJ.

  62. On November 4, 2016 at 9:28 pm, joefour said:

    Yes! I think there would be a truly historic housecleaning within that corrupt agency!

  63. On November 4, 2016 at 10:22 pm, joefour said:

    For those not familiar with Trey Gowdy–he is a Congressman from South Carolina. There are numerous videos on YouTube featuring him questioning various Administration officials….take a look….highly recommended!

  64. On November 5, 2016 at 1:16 am, Josh said:

    Gowdy is my district rep. You’re welcome.

    He and Chaffetz will absolutely dismantle the cancerous rot if unleashed.

  65. On November 4, 2016 at 8:48 pm, TheAlaskan said:

    As a father of two small children, this is truly disturbing (looking at the links.) I think I’ll oil all my guns.

  66. On November 5, 2016 at 10:44 pm, StukaPilot said:

    Trump is no solution. He has, as Cruz pointed out, “(((NY))) values” (abortion, porn, drugs, faggotry, feminism). And is a friend of (((Jeffrey Eisner))), who “likes ’em young”. If elected, he will do nothing about the Clintons because “it would be too divisive”. We’re better off with Hiligula: she’ll burn this place down fast. “Gun rights”? No one can take our guns away from us unless we let them.

  67. On November 5, 2016 at 11:08 pm, GenEarly said:

    Trump/Pence 2016, and Trump may not run for a second term with such an able and Christian VP as Pence in 2020……but my dreams of the future are usually idealistic and the USSA looks at least 50% in favor of the demonic progreSSive. Let come what will, I’m ready as I’ll ever be.

  68. On November 6, 2016 at 12:00 am, Loneviking said:

    The best comment I’ve heard about the two candidates is “Trump makes me nervous. Hillary makes me want to take poison!”.

    Hillary, John and Tony Podesta, Huma and others in her inner circle are evil to the core of their black souls. I voted Trump and I hope he does clean out the putrid mess in Washington.

  69. On November 6, 2016 at 11:59 pm, Grandpa said:

    Israel wanted a king… they got Saul. America wants a president… fill in the blank. We have turned our back on God as a nation, and until “My people, who are called by My name… will turn from their sin, ask for forgiveness, and cry out to Me…” He will not heal our land. Period, full stop. – Grandpa

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment


You are currently reading "Hillary Clinton, Pedophile And Child Kidnapping Ring, And Endorsement Of Trump", entry #15841 on The Captain's Journal.

This article is filed under the category(s) Politics and was published November 3rd, 2016 by Herschel Smith.

If you're interested in what else the The Captain's Journal has to say, you might try thumbing through the archives and visiting the main index, or; perhaps you would like to learn more about TCJ.

26th MEU (10)
Abu Muqawama (12)
ACOG (2)
ACOGs (1)
Afghan National Army (36)
Afghan National Police (17)
Afghanistan (679)
Afghanistan SOFA (4)
Agriculture in COIN (3)
AGW (1)
Air Force (31)
Air Power (9)
al Qaeda (83)
Ali al-Sistani (1)
America (7)
Ammunition (27)
Animals in War (4)
Ansar al Sunna (15)
Anthropology (3)
Antonin Scalia (1)
AR-15s (96)
Arghandab River Valley (1)
Arlington Cemetery (2)
Army (52)
Assassinations (2)
Assault Weapon Ban (26)
Australian Army (5)
Azerbaijan (4)
Backpacking (2)
Badr Organization (8)
Baitullah Mehsud (21)
Basra (17)
BATFE (55)
Battle of Bari Alai (2)
Battle of Wanat (17)
Battle Space Weight (3)
Bin Laden (7)
Blogroll (2)
Blogs (7)
Body Armor (17)
Books (2)
Border War (7)
Brady Campaign (1)
Britain (27)
British Army (35)
Camping (4)
Canada (2)
Castle Doctrine (1)
Caucasus (6)
CENTCOM (7)
Center For a New American Security (8)
Charity (3)
China (10)
Christmas (8)
CIA (23)
Civilian National Security Force (3)
Col. Gian Gentile (9)
Combat Outposts (3)
Combat Video (2)
Concerned Citizens (6)
Constabulary Actions (3)
Coolness Factor (2)
COP Keating (4)
Corruption in COIN (4)
Council on Foreign Relations (1)
Counterinsurgency (215)
DADT (2)
David Rohde (1)
Defense Contractors (2)
Department of Defense (131)
Department of Homeland Security (16)
Disaster Preparedness (3)
Distributed Operations (5)
Dogs (6)
Donald Trump (1)
Drone Campaign (3)
EFV (3)
Egypt (12)
El Salvador (1)
Embassy Security (1)
Enemy Spotters (1)
Expeditionary Warfare (17)
F-22 (2)
F-35 (1)
Fallujah (17)
Far East (3)
Fathers and Sons (1)
Favorite (1)
Fazlullah (3)
FBI (8)
Featured (177)
Federal Firearms Laws (18)
Financing the Taliban (2)
Firearms (638)
Football (1)
Force Projection (35)
Force Protection (4)
Force Transformation (1)
Foreign Policy (27)
Fukushima Reactor Accident (6)
Ganjgal (1)
Garmsir (1)
general (14)
General Amos (1)
General James Mattis (1)
General McChrystal (41)
General McKiernan (6)
General Rodriguez (3)
General Suleimani (7)
Georgia (19)
GITMO (2)
Google (1)
Gulbuddin Hekmatyar (1)
Gun Control (506)
Guns (1,134)
Guns In National Parks (3)
Haditha Roundup (10)
Haiti (2)
HAMAS (7)
Haqqani Network (9)
Hate Mail (7)
Hekmatyar (1)
Heroism (4)
Hezbollah (12)
High Capacity Magazines (11)
High Value Targets (9)
Homecoming (1)
Homeland Security (1)
Horses (1)
Humor (13)
ICOS (1)
IEDs (7)
Immigration (57)
India (10)
Infantry (4)
Information Warfare (2)
Infrastructure (2)
Intelligence (22)
Intelligence Bulletin (6)
Iran (169)
Iraq (378)
Iraq SOFA (23)
Islamic Facism (45)
Islamists (71)
Israel (18)
Jaish al Mahdi (21)
Jalalabad (1)
Japan (2)
Jihadists (80)
John Nagl (5)
Joint Intelligence Centers (1)
JRTN (1)
Kabul (1)
Kajaki Dam (1)
Kamdesh (9)
Kandahar (12)
Karachi (7)
Kashmir (2)
Khost Province (1)
Khyber (11)
Knife Blogging (2)
Korea (4)
Korengal Valley (3)
Kunar Province (20)
Kurdistan (3)
Language in COIN (5)
Language in Statecraft (1)
Language Interpreters (2)
Lashkar-e-Taiba (2)
Law Enforcement (3)
Lawfare (6)
Leadership (5)
Lebanon (6)
Leon Panetta (2)
Let Them Fight (2)
Libya (14)
Lines of Effort (3)
Littoral Combat (8)
Logistics (49)
Long Guns (1)
Lt. Col. Allen West (2)
Marine Corps (245)
Marines in Bakwa (1)
Marines in Helmand (67)
Marjah (4)
MEDEVAC (2)
Media (36)
Memorial Day (3)
Mexican Cartels (24)
Mexico (30)
Michael Yon (5)
Micromanaging the Military (7)
Middle East (1)
Military Blogging (26)
Military Contractors (4)
Military Equipment (24)
Militia (4)
Mitt Romney (3)
Monetary Policy (1)
Moqtada al Sadr (2)
Mosul (4)
Mountains (17)
MRAPs (1)
Mullah Baradar (1)
Mullah Fazlullah (1)
Mullah Omar (3)
Musa Qala (4)
Music (16)
Muslim Brotherhood (6)
Nation Building (2)
National Internet IDs (1)
National Rifle Association (17)
NATO (15)
Navy (21)
Navy Corpsman (1)
NCOs (3)
News (1)
NGOs (2)
Nicholas Schmidle (2)
Now Zad (19)
NSA (3)
NSA James L. Jones (6)
Nuclear (53)
Nuristan (8)
Obama Administration (218)
Offshore Balancing (1)
Operation Alljah (7)
Operation Khanjar (14)
Ossetia (7)
Pakistan (165)
Paktya Province (1)
Palestine (5)
Patriotism (6)
Patrolling (1)
Pech River Valley (11)
Personal (34)
Petraeus (14)
Pictures (1)
Piracy (13)
Pistol (2)
Pizzagate (21)
Police (256)
Police in COIN (3)
Policy (15)
Politics (319)
Poppy (2)
PPEs (1)
Prisons in Counterinsurgency (12)
Project Gunrunner (20)
PRTs (1)
Qatar (1)
Quadrennial Defense Review (2)
Quds Force (13)
Quetta Shura (1)
RAND (3)
Recommended Reading (14)
Refueling Tanker (1)
Religion (120)
Religion and Insurgency (19)
Reuters (1)
Rick Perry (4)
Rifles (1)
Roads (4)
Rolling Stone (1)
Ron Paul (1)
ROTC (1)
Rules of Engagement (75)
Rumsfeld (1)
Russia (29)
Sabbatical (1)
Sangin (1)
Saqlawiyah (1)
Satellite Patrols (2)
Saudi Arabia (4)
Scenes from Iraq (1)
Second Amendment (193)
Second Amendment Quick Hits (2)
Secretary Gates (9)
Sharia Law (3)
Shura Ittehad-ul-Mujahiden (1)
SIIC (2)
Sirajuddin Haqqani (1)
Small Wars (72)
Snipers (9)
Sniveling Lackeys (2)
Soft Power (4)
Somalia (8)
Sons of Afghanistan (1)
Sons of Iraq (2)
Special Forces (25)
Squad Rushes (1)
State Department (18)
Statistics (1)
Sunni Insurgency (10)
Support to Infantry Ratio (1)
Supreme Court (3)
Survival (14)
SWAT Raids (53)
Syria (38)
Tactical Drills (1)
Tactical Gear (1)
Taliban (167)
Taliban Massing of Forces (4)
Tarmiyah (1)
TBI (1)
Technology (16)
Tehrik-i-Taliban (78)
Terrain in Combat (1)
Terrorism (92)
Thanksgiving (6)
The Anbar Narrative (23)
The Art of War (5)
The Fallen (1)
The Long War (20)
The Surge (3)
The Wounded (13)
Thomas Barnett (1)
Transnational Insurgencies (5)
Tribes (5)
TSA (14)
TSA Ineptitude (11)
TTPs (1)
U.S. Border Patrol (5)
U.S. Border Security (14)
U.S. Sovereignty (17)
UAVs (2)
UBL (4)
Ukraine (3)
Uncategorized (42)
Universal Background Check (3)
Unrestricted Warfare (4)
USS Iwo Jima (2)
USS San Antonio (1)
Uzbekistan (1)
V-22 Osprey (4)
Veterans (2)
Vietnam (1)
War & Warfare (212)
War & Warfare (40)
War Movies (3)
War Reporting (18)
Wardak Province (1)
Warriors (6)
Waziristan (1)
Weapons and Tactics (57)
West Point (1)
Winter Operations (1)
Women in Combat (19)
WTF? (1)
Yemen (1)

June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006

about · archives · contact · register

Copyright © 2006-2017 Captain's Journal. All rights reserved.