<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rapidly Collapsing U.S. Foreign Policy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.captainsjournal.com/2009/02/22/rapidly-collapsing-us-foreign-policy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.captainsjournal.com/2009/02/22/rapidly-collapsing-us-foreign-policy/</link>
	<description>News &#38; Commentary on Warfare, Policy and Counterterrorism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 13:52:14 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: fumento</title>
		<link>http://www.captainsjournal.com/2009/02/22/rapidly-collapsing-us-foreign-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-27208</link>
		<dc:creator>fumento</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 20:18:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.captainsjournal.com/?p=2205#comment-27208</guid>
		<description>I have a piece out in Defense News (http://www.fumento.com/military/raptor2009.html) that discusses the capabilities of the S-300 system within the context of the need to continue building more of the F-22 Raptor. I write:

Russian surface-to-air missiles (SAMs) have improved dramatically in recent years. The country’s S-300 system is “one of the most lethal, if not the most lethal, all-altitude area defense,” noted the International Strategy and Assessment Service, &quot;a Virginia-based think tank focused on U.S. and Allied security issues.&quot; three years ago. China also has the S-300 and the Russians announced in December they’ll soon sell units to Iran.

The sale not only would threaten stand-off warning and control systems like AWACS but also tremendously boost defense of Iran’s Bushehr nuclear reactor and Natanz uranium-enrichment site.

The newer S-400 system, already deployed, is far better able to detect low-signature targets and aircraft generally, as far away as 250 miles away, according to the FAS. That’s twice that of the S-300. When mated with the Triumf SA-20/21 missile, which Russia claims it tested in December, it can even knock down ballistic missiles.

“Only the F-22 can survive in airspace defended by increasingly capable surface-to-air missiles,” declared Air Force Association President Mike Dunn in December.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a piece out in Defense News (<a href="http://www.fumento.com/military/raptor2009.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.fumento.com/military/raptor2009.html</a>) that discusses the capabilities of the S-300 system within the context of the need to continue building more of the F-22 Raptor. I write:</p>
<p>Russian surface-to-air missiles (SAMs) have improved dramatically in recent years. The country’s S-300 system is “one of the most lethal, if not the most lethal, all-altitude area defense,” noted the International Strategy and Assessment Service, &#8220;a Virginia-based think tank focused on U.S. and Allied security issues.&#8221; three years ago. China also has the S-300 and the Russians announced in December they’ll soon sell units to Iran.</p>
<p>The sale not only would threaten stand-off warning and control systems like AWACS but also tremendously boost defense of Iran’s Bushehr nuclear reactor and Natanz uranium-enrichment site.</p>
<p>The newer S-400 system, already deployed, is far better able to detect low-signature targets and aircraft generally, as far away as 250 miles away, according to the FAS. That’s twice that of the S-300. When mated with the Triumf SA-20/21 missile, which Russia claims it tested in December, it can even knock down ballistic missiles.</p>
<p>“Only the F-22 can survive in airspace defended by increasingly capable surface-to-air missiles,” declared Air Force Association President Mike Dunn in December.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Instapundit &#187; Blog Archive &#187; UH OH: Rapidly Collapsing U.S. Foreign Policy. Let&#8217;s hope it&#8217;s not as bad as it looks. &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.captainsjournal.com/2009/02/22/rapidly-collapsing-us-foreign-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-27188</link>
		<dc:creator>Instapundit &#187; Blog Archive &#187; UH OH: Rapidly Collapsing U.S. Foreign Policy. Let&#8217;s hope it&#8217;s not as bad as it looks. &#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 03:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.captainsjournal.com/?p=2205#comment-27188</guid>
		<description>[...] OH: Rapidly Collapsing U.S. Foreign Policy. Let&#8217;s hope it&#8217;s not as bad as it [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] OH: Rapidly Collapsing U.S. Foreign Policy. Let&#8217;s hope it&#8217;s not as bad as it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
