Marines Take, Army Holds?

BY Herschel Smith
1 year, 1 month ago

From the North County Times:

CAMP PENDLETON —- As Pentagon planners wrestle with a proposal that the Marine Corps take the lead in Afghanistan and leave Iraq largely in the hands of the Army, troops at Camp Pendleton say the idea makes sense.

Several officers and enlisted men spoke to the North County Times last week about the proposal on the condition their names not be used, saying they didn’t want to run afoul of their commanders.

“People are talking it about it all the time,” a lieutenant colonel said of the idea that the Marines be shifted to a new mission. “We go in, we kick ass and we turn it over to the Army. We’re not supposed to be a long-term occupying force.”

A base master sergeant said the idea recently floated by Marine Corps Commandant James Conway is a “hot topic” in staff sessions.

“People are saying it makes sense,” the sergeant said. “We’re not supposed to be in Iraq as a security force. We’re an expeditionary fighting force that trains for combat, not civil affairs.”

Conway has said that he made the proposal because security is improving in Iraq. He said his troops should be serving in a quick-reaction combat role, rather than as an occupying force bogged down by civil affairs work.

Army leaders have declined to comment on Conway’s suggestion, which will ultimately be decided by the White House and by Defense Secretary Robert Gates.

On Thursday, Gates threw cold water on the idea.

“I would say if that if it happens, it’ll be long after I’m secretary of defense,” he told reporters during a news conference in Washington.

There is the crux of the issue, isn’t it?  The Marines are an expeditionary force, fighters with an ethos of battle.  Gates may indeed push back against the idea.  However, is his statement more an observation of the inertia in a large bureaucracy with respect to planning and change?  Is he saying that he doubts that the Marines can make the plans and obtain agreement from the other branches of the Armed Forces in the time remaining on his watch?  If so, it would seem that he has set the gauntlet in place, and it is time for the Corps to respond.

Prior:

The Future of the Marines

Marines or State Department: Who Does Afghanistan?

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.


You are currently reading "Marines Take, Army Holds?", entry #661 on The Captain's Journal.

This article is filed under the category(s) Department of Defense, Marine Corps and was published October 21st, 2007 by Herschel Smith.

If you're interested in what else the The Captain's Journal has to say, you might try thumbing through the archives and visiting the main index, or; perhaps you would like to learn more about TCJ.

26th MEU (5)
Afghanistan (195)
Air Force (21)
Air Power (5)
al Qaeda (61)
America (1)
Ansar al Sunna (15)
Anthropology (3)
Arlington Cemetery (1)
Army (12)
Australian Army (2)
Badr Organization (8)
Baitullah Mehsud (12)
Basra (14)
Battle of Wanat (2)
Body Armor (8)
Books (1)
Britain (15)
British Army (21)
CENTCOM (4)
Charity (3)
CIA (2)
Civilian National Security Force (2)
Combat Video (1)
Concerned Citizens (5)
Constabulary Actions (3)
Counterinsurgency (93)
Department of Defense (65)
Distributed Operations (2)
Dogs (1)
Fallujah (13)
Far East (3)
Favorite (1)
Featured (61)
Force Projection (20)
general (13)
General McKiernan (1)
General Suleimani (2)
Georgia (5)
Google (1)
Haditha Roundup (10)
HAMAS (1)
Hate Mail (7)
Heroism (1)
Hezbollah (5)
Humor (6)
Immigration (15)
Infrastructure (2)
Intelligence (10)
Intelligence Bulletin (6)
Iran (111)
Iraq (314)
Iraq SOFA (6)
Islamic Facism (24)
Islamists (11)
Israel (2)
Jaish al Mahdi (21)
Jihadists (53)
Kajaki Dam (1)
Kandahar (1)
Karachi (3)
Kashmir (1)
Khyber (8)
Korea (1)
Language Interpreters (1)
Lawfare (3)
Leadership (2)
Lebanon (4)
Logistics (5)
Marine Corps (82)
Marines in Helmand (17)
Media (2)
Memorial Day (1)
Military Blogging (13)
Military Equipment (15)
Mosul (4)
Mountains (2)
Mullah Fazlullah (1)
Musa Qala (1)
Music (12)
NATO (13)
Navy (5)
Nuclear (19)
Operation Alljah (7)
Ossetia (5)
Pakistan (90)
Palestine (1)
Personal (4)
Petraeus (5)
Piracy (2)
Police in COIN (1)
Policy (5)
Politics (59)
Poppy (1)
Qatar (1)
Quds Force (9)
RAND (1)
Recommended Reading (1)
Religion (30)
Religion and Insurgency (12)
Roads (1)
Rules of Engagement (24)
Russia (7)
Sabbatical (1)
Saqlawiyah (1)
Saudi Arabia (1)
Scenes from Iraq (1)
SIIC (2)
Small Wars (72)
Snipers (8)
Soft Power (1)
Somalia (2)
Special Forces (2)
State Department (4)
Sunni Insurgency (10)
Syria (21)
Taliban (90)
Tarmiyah (1)
TBI (1)
Technology (15)
Tehrik-i-Taliban (35)
Terrorism (75)
The Anbar Narrative (16)
The Art of War (5)
The Fallen (1)
The Long War (11)
The Surge (1)
The Wounded (8)
Thomas Barnett (1)
Transnational Insurgencies (2)
Tribes (2)
TSA Ineptitude (1)
U.S. Sovereignty (3)
UAVs (1)
Ukraine (1)
Uncategorized (14)
USS Iwo Jima (2)
V-22 Osprey (4)
Veterans (1)
War & Warfare (198)
War & Warfare (36)
War Movies (1)
War Reporting (13)
Warriors (3)
Weapons and Tactics (34)
Winter Operations (1)
Women in Combat (4)


Prev | List | Random | Next · Join Powered by RingSurf!

Featured in Alltop

about · archives · contact · register

Copyright © 2006-2008 Captain's Journal. All rights reserved.